From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A415EC4320E for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 05:26:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E6E60F45 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 05:26:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232099AbhH3F1K (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 01:27:10 -0400 Received: from mx13.kaspersky-labs.com ([91.103.66.164]:20409 "EHLO mx13.kaspersky-labs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229936AbhH3F1J (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 01:27:09 -0400 Received: from relay13.kaspersky-labs.com (unknown [127.0.0.10]) by relay13.kaspersky-labs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D1D520CAF; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:26:13 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kaspersky.com; s=mail202102; t=1630301174; bh=G/A08wErR8GWnTnK1CdgiTF5nygATzwelmcu0b9y9ro=; h=Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=4AVjG71Lb7lM2JlsSOE98NhJsd2f6r2OEpN3SxSc+Q5yNTiXqcDUfFcevbXbuHB4r 3moNwB4A3FJuQz1Bm32+9TkOFE9lUZwH4/ElRRNxp6A5N+MGWzFXVEbRKdrhqLp2JL 9yzLN0G93YADJ9Wbi2sZLJmSCVVEL2Aob+7x8PXWG0tkrgfBKN3nuhQQso4GbchXOV Sy6fmc6dCOLIkka0snugW2XtEpkVKMRlqcR+Kc47YaYy8N1M3owJJdoV/CcuOa0PE4 NsDTPsmJfOgQ8dF/exfeJigCrm91nQpj3FjPZDojEkdzPiMnr+WYtideZJftA0R/54 yoOkv+B2wu/fQ== Received: from mail-hq2.kaspersky.com (unknown [91.103.66.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail-hq2.kaspersky.com", Issuer "Kaspersky MailRelays CA G3" (verified OK)) by mailhub13.kaspersky-labs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 046075214EE; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:26:13 +0300 (MSK) Received: from [10.16.171.77] (10.64.64.121) by hqmailmbx3.avp.ru (10.64.67.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:26:12 +0300 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/6] virtio/vsock: introduce MSG_EOR flag for SEQPACKET From: Arseny Krasnov To: Stefano Garzarella CC: Stefan Hajnoczi , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Norbert Slusarek , Andra Paraschiv , Colin Ian King , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stsp2@yandex.ru" , "oxffffaa@gmail.com" References: <20210816085036.4173627-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com> <3f3fc268-10fc-1917-32c2-dc0e7737dc48@kaspersky.com> <20210824100523.yn5hgiycz2ysdnvm@steredhat> <20210824103137.v3fny2yc5ww46p33@steredhat> <0c0a7b61-524e-ab44-7d7e-b35bd094c7ca@kaspersky.com> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:26:12 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0c0a7b61-524e-ab44-7d7e-b35bd094c7ca@kaspersky.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.64.64.121] X-ClientProxiedBy: hqmailmbx3.avp.ru (10.64.67.243) To hqmailmbx3.avp.ru (10.64.67.243) X-KSE-ServerInfo: hqmailmbx3.avp.ru, 9 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KSE-AntiSpam-Version: 5.9.20, Database issued on: 08/30/2021 05:09:14 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Status: KAS_STATUS_NOT_DETECTED X-KSE-AntiSpam-Method: none X-KSE-AntiSpam-Rate: 0 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Lua profiles 165837 [Aug 30 2021] X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Version: 5.9.20.0 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Envelope from: arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: LuaCore: 457 457 f9912fc467375383fbac52a53ade5bbe1c769e2a X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: {Tracking_from_domain_doesnt_match_to} X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: kaspersky.com:7.1.1;d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e.com:7.1.1;127.0.0.199:7.1.2 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Rate: 0 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Status: not_detected X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Method: none X-KSE-Antiphishing-Info: Clean X-KSE-Antiphishing-ScanningType: Deterministic X-KSE-Antiphishing-Method: None X-KSE-Antiphishing-Bases: 08/30/2021 05:12:00 X-KSE-AttachmentFiltering-Interceptor-Info: no applicable attachment filtering rules found X-KSE-Antivirus-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KSE-Antivirus-Info: Clean, bases: 30.08.2021 3:54:00 X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: InTheLimit X-KSE-AttachmentFiltering-Interceptor-Info: no applicable attachment filtering rules found X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: InTheLimit X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 52 X-KLMS-Message-Action: clean X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not scanned, disabled by settings X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: not scanned X-KLMS-AntiPhishing: Clean, bases: 2021/08/30 03:39:00 X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security for Linux Mail Server, version 8.0.3.30, bases: 2021/08/30 03:40:00 #17126216 X-KLMS-AntiVirus-Status: Clean, skipped Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 24.08.2021 14:35, Arseny Krasnov wrote: > On 24.08.2021 13:31, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> Caution: This is an external email. Be cautious while opening links or attachments. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 01:18:06PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote: >>> On 24.08.2021 13:05, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >>>> Caution: This is an external email. Be cautious while opening links or attachments. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Arseny, >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 09:41:16PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote: >>>>> Hello, please ping :) >>>>> >>>> Sorry, I was off last week. >>>> I left some minor comments in the patches. >>>> >>>> Let's wait a bit for other comments before next version, also on the >>>> spec, then I think you can send the next version without RFC tag. >>>> The target should be the net-next tree, since this is a new feature. >>> Hello, >>> >>> E.g. next version will be [net-next] instead of [RFC] for both >>> kernel and spec patches? >> Nope, net-next tag is useful only for kernel patches (net tree - >> Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst). > Ack Hello, as there are no new comments on this week, i can send new patchsets for both kernel and spec today. Kernel patches will be with 'net-next' tag instead of RFC, spec patches will be without RFC tag. Thank You >> Thanks, >> Stefano >> >>