LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] block, bfq: do not idle if only one cgroup is activated
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 19:19:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7900f33-5f27-a6e3-ee3d-f68ad9d8a6d3@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F1ADC992-11AE-4511-9033-D233CBCA6F26@linaro.org>
On 2021/09/07 17:10, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
>
>> Il giorno 2 set 2021, alle ore 15:31, yukuai (C) <yukuai3@huawei.com> ha scritto:
>>
>> On 2021/08/27 1:00, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>> Why do you make these extensive changes, while you can leave all the
>>> function unchanged and just modify the above condition to something
>>> like
>>> || bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs > 1
>>> || (bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs && bfqd->num_queues_with_pending_reqs_in_root)
>>
>> Hi, Paolo
>>
>> I was thinking that if CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED is enabled, there is no
>> need to caculate smallest_weight, varied_queue_weights, and
>> multiple_classes_busy:
>>
>> If we count root group into num_groups_with_pending_reqs
>> - If num_groups_with_pending_reqs <= 1, idle is not needed
>
> Unfortunately, if active queues have different weights or belong to
> different classes, then idling is needed to preserve per-queue
> bandwidths.
>
> Thanks,
> Paolo
Hi, Paolo
It's right, if num_groups_with_pending_reqs == 1, multiple_classes_busy
should be checked, while smallest_weight and varied_queue_weights can
be skipped.
Thanks
Kuai
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-07 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-06 2:08 [PATCH v2 0/4] optimize the bfq queue idle judgment Yu Kuai
2021-08-06 2:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] block, bfq: add support to track if root_group have any pending requests Yu Kuai
2021-08-26 17:00 ` Paolo Valente
2021-09-02 13:23 ` yukuai (C)
2021-08-06 2:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] block, bfq: do not idle if only one cgroup is activated Yu Kuai
2021-08-26 17:00 ` Paolo Valente
2021-09-02 13:31 ` yukuai (C)
2021-09-07 9:10 ` Paolo Valente
2021-09-07 11:19 ` yukuai (C) [this message]
2021-08-06 2:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] block, bfq: add support to record request size information Yu Kuai
2021-08-26 17:00 ` Paolo Valente
2021-08-06 2:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] block, bfq: consider request size in bfq_asymmetric_scenario() Yu Kuai
2021-08-26 17:00 ` Paolo Valente
2021-09-07 11:29 ` yukuai (C)
2021-09-15 7:36 ` Paolo Valente
2021-09-15 7:47 ` yukuai (C)
2021-08-14 2:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] optimize the bfq queue idle judgment yukuai (C)
2021-08-24 14:09 ` yukuai (C)
2021-08-26 16:59 ` Paolo Valente
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7900f33-5f27-a6e3-ee3d-f68ad9d8a6d3@huawei.com \
--to=yukuai3@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] block, bfq: do not idle if only one cgroup is activated' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).