Re: [PATCH 4/4] Revert "mm/page_alloc: make should_fail_alloc_page() static"

[John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>]

On 7/13/21 8:21 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> From: Matteo Croce <mcroce@microsoft.com>
> 
> This reverts commit f7173090033c70886d925995e9dfdfb76dbb2441.
> 
> Fix an unresolved symbol error when CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y:
> 
>    LD      vmlinux
>    BTFIDS  vmlinux
> FAILED unresolved symbol should_fail_alloc_page
> make: *** [Makefile:1199: vmlinux] Error 255
> make: *** Deleting file 'vmlinux'

Yes! I ran into this yesterday. Your patch fixes this build failure
for me, so feel free to add:

Tested-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>


However, I should add that I'm still seeing another build failure, after
fixing the above:

LD      vmlinux
BTFIDS  vmlinux
FAILED elf_update(WRITE): no error
make: *** [Makefile:1176: vmlinux] Error 255
make: *** Deleting file 'vmlinux'


...and un-setting CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF makes that disappear. Maybe someone
who is understands the BTFIDS build step can shed some light on that; I'm
not there yet. :)


thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA

> 
> Fixes: f7173090033c ("mm/page_alloc: make should_fail_alloc_page() static")
> Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@microsoft.com>
> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210708191128.153796-1-mcroce@linux.microsoft.com
> ---
>   mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index c66f1e6204c2..3e97e68aef7a 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -3820,7 +3820,7 @@ static inline bool __should_fail_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
>   
>   #endif /* CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC */
>   
> -static noinline bool should_fail_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> +noinline bool should_fail_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
>   {
>   	return __should_fail_alloc_page(gfp_mask, order);
>   }
>