From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755130Ab1ATIHQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jan 2011 03:07:16 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:60389 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754162Ab1ATIHP (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jan 2011 03:07:15 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: WANG Cong Subject: Re: Checkpatch problem with Kconfig help symbol ? Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1295440968.2276.46.camel@dell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 60.247.97.98 User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:42:48 +0200, Tapio Vihuri wrote: > Hi > > Is this false positive ? > > WARNING: please write a paragraph that describes the config symbol fully > #60: FILE: drivers/input/misc/Kconfig:159: + help > > > Interesting enough, also: > > ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --file drivers/input/misc/Kconfig WARNING: > please write a paragraph that describes the config symbol fully #430: > FILE: input/misc/Kconfig:430: > + help > > > But this is different line. > Seems yes, the Kconfig part of your patch looks fine.