LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc5-mm2 - compile error on x86-64
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:10:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m14po3jozn.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070329152317.56df80d0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:23:17 -0700")
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
>
> config PROC_SYSCTL
> bool "Sysctl support (/proc/sys)" if EMBEDDED
> depends on PROC_FS
> select SYSCTL
> default y
>
> CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL depends on CONFIG_PROC_FS
> CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL selects CONFIG_SYSCTL
>
> So I don't see anything preventing CONFIG_SYSCTL=y, CONFIG_PROC_FS=y,
> CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL=n. I assume we can make this combination compile, link
> and run easily enough. I dunno if it makes any actual sense though?
>
>
> I'd have thought that PROC_SYSCTL should just depend on SYSCTL. But
> SYSCTL's Kconfig setup is weird.
Yes. My memory is now coming back. I did a few weird things in there
when I was making the binary interface optional, and it looks like
I never updated the #ifdef in fs/proc/root.c The primary intent
was to allow the proc support without the binary interface but I
guess the other configuration makes some sense as well in an embedded
scenario when you are trying to be as efficient as possible. As I
recall the binary interface is less resource intensive then the /proc
interface.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-30 5:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-27 5:16 2.6.21-rc5-mm2 Andrew Morton
2007-03-27 10:04 ` 2.6.21-rc5-mm2 William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-28 17:02 ` 2.6.21-rc5-mm2 Andreas Mohr
2007-03-28 17:33 ` 2.6.21-rc5-mm2 Andreas Mohr
2007-03-28 17:45 ` 2.6.21-rc5-mm2 Andreas Mohr
2007-03-28 18:04 ` tty OOPS (Re: 2.6.21-rc5-mm2) Andreas Mohr
2007-03-28 18:38 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-03-28 18:56 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-03-28 20:07 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-29 12:48 ` Maneesh Soni
2007-03-28 20:15 ` [FIXED] " Andreas Mohr
2007-03-28 21:08 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-03-28 21:27 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-03-28 17:42 ` 2.6.21-rc5-mm2 Christian
2007-03-28 17:55 ` 2.6.21-rc5-mm2 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-03-28 18:36 ` 2.6.21-rc5-mm2 Badari Pulavarty
2007-03-28 20:20 ` 2.6.21-rc5-mm2 OOPS and spinlock lockup Zan Lynx
2007-03-28 20:50 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-29 17:53 ` 2.6.21-rc5-mm2 Badari Pulavarty
2007-03-29 17:23 ` 2.6.21-rc5-mm2 Andrew Morton
2007-03-29 18:20 ` 2.6.21-rc5-mm2 - compile error on x86-64 Helge Hafting
2007-03-29 21:28 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-29 22:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-29 22:23 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-30 5:10 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2007-03-29 22:24 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-03-31 6:27 ` Helge Hafting
2007-03-31 6:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-31 6:50 ` Helge Hafting
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m14po3jozn.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=helgehaf@aitel.hist.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--subject='Re: 2.6.21-rc5-mm2 - compile error on x86-64' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).