From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751132AbXBZAPM (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Feb 2007 19:15:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751148AbXBZAPM (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Feb 2007 19:15:12 -0500 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:37552 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751132AbXBZAPL (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Feb 2007 19:15:11 -0500 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: David Miller Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: MSI entry unlinked before arch_teardown_msi_irq(). References: <20070224.235020.92583817.davem@davemloft.net> <20070225.154637.70478886.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 17:14:43 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20070225.154637.70478886.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:46:37 -0800 (PST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Miller writes: > From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) > Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 02:08:07 -0700 > >> If that isn't the issue holler and I will look into it a little more. > > Talking in code is always more effective :-) > > This patch fixes the OOPS I was talking about: Ok. That is clearly reasonable. Why do you need to traverse the list here? I just want to understand the requirements. Eric