LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Pekka Paalanen <pq@iki.fi>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbeulich@novell.com
Subject: Re: Replacement for page fault notifiers?
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:47:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <p73zlveo6az.fsf@bingen.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080109164241.7daa5770@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (Arjan van de Ven's message of "Wed\, 9 Jan 2008 16\:42\:41 -0800")

Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> writes:
>
> I'm btw all in favor of making mmio tracing full fledged kernel infrastructure.
> This doesn't mean "notifier" imo; this means a real flag in the struct page,
> and then the page fault code can do
>
> if (page->flags & FLAG_MMIO_TRACED)
> 	mmio_trace(page, regs, whatever..);
>
> (probably surrounded by a CONFIG_ ifdef)
> THis is a TON lighter than a notifier chain, and actually what you want,
> you don't really want a notifier, you want a call back when a special kind of
> page is touched.

That would assume that your mmio area has a struct page. In most PCs 
the ones in the PCI hole don't

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-10  0:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-08 19:06 Pekka Paalanen
2008-01-08 20:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-08 22:13   ` Dave Airlie
2008-01-09  0:26     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-01-09 18:18       ` Pavel Roskin
2008-01-09 18:21         ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-09 19:58           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-01-09 20:22             ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-10  0:42               ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-10  0:47                 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-01-10  0:55                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-10  0:58                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-01-10  1:01                     ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-10  0:56                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-01-10  2:03                 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-10  2:21                   ` Pavel Roskin
2008-01-10  2:30                     ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-10 18:44               ` Pekka Paalanen
2008-01-09 20:24             ` Pavel Roskin
2008-01-09 20:26               ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-09 20:41                 ` Pavel Roskin
2008-01-09 20:44                 ` Valdis.Kletnieks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=p73zlveo6az.fsf@bingen.suse.de \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pq@iki.fi \
    --cc=proski@gnu.org \
    --subject='Re: Replacement for page fault notifiers?' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).