LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Valentin Schneider <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Don't increase sd->balance_interval on newidle balance
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 17:13:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-3f130a37c442d5c4d66531b240ebe9abfef426b5@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1537974727-30788-2-git-send-email-valentin.schneider@arm.com>

Commit-ID:  3f130a37c442d5c4d66531b240ebe9abfef426b5
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/3f130a37c442d5c4d66531b240ebe9abfef426b5
Author:     Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:12:07 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Sun, 4 Nov 2018 00:59:23 +0100

sched/fair: Don't increase sd->balance_interval on newidle balance

When load_balance() fails to move some load because of task affinity,
we end up increasing sd->balance_interval to delay the next periodic
balance in the hopes that next time we look, that annoying pinned
task(s) will be gone.

However, idle_balance() pays no attention to sd->balance_interval, yet
it will still lead to an increase in balance_interval in case of
pinned tasks.

If we're going through several newidle balances (e.g. we have a
periodic task), this can lead to a huge increase of the
balance_interval in a very small amount of time.

To prevent that, don't increase the balance interval when going
through a newidle balance.

This is a similar approach to what is done in commit 58b26c4c0257
("sched: Increment cache_nice_tries only on periodic lb"), where we
disregard newidle balance and rely on periodic balance for more stable
results.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537974727-30788-2-git-send-email-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 4e298931a715..a17ca4254427 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -8876,13 +8876,22 @@ out_all_pinned:
 	sd->nr_balance_failed = 0;
 
 out_one_pinned:
+	ld_moved = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * idle_balance() disregards balance intervals, so we could repeatedly
+	 * reach this code, which would lead to balance_interval skyrocketting
+	 * in a short amount of time. Skip the balance_interval increase logic
+	 * to avoid that.
+	 */
+	if (env.idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE)
+		goto out;
+
 	/* tune up the balancing interval */
 	if ((env.flags & LBF_ALL_PINNED &&
 	     sd->balance_interval < MAX_PINNED_INTERVAL) ||
 	    sd->balance_interval < sd->max_interval)
 		sd->balance_interval *= 2;
-
-	ld_moved = 0;
 out:
 	return ld_moved;
 }

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-04  0:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-26 15:12 [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/fair: Cleanup load_balance() condition Valentin Schneider
2018-09-26 15:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/fair: Don't increase sd->balance_interval on newidle balance Valentin Schneider
2018-11-04  0:13   ` tip-bot for Valentin Schneider [this message]
2018-10-30 10:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/fair: Cleanup load_balance() condition Valentin Schneider
2018-10-30 12:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-04  0:13 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Clean up " tip-bot for Valentin Schneider

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-3f130a37c442d5c4d66531b240ebe9abfef426b5@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --subject='Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Don'\''t increase sd->balance_interval on newidle balance' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).