LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, rostedt@goodmis.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:core/locking] lockdep/timers: Explain in detail the locking problems del_timer_sync() may cause
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:51:04 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-48228f7b470a74b6469a250d2977a13128d8fe96@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297186794.23343.19.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Commit-ID: 48228f7b470a74b6469a250d2977a13128d8fe96
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/48228f7b470a74b6469a250d2977a13128d8fe96
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:39:54 -0500
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:35:08 +0100
lockdep/timers: Explain in detail the locking problems del_timer_sync() may cause
Twice I had to explain the output about why lockdep gives an error with
locks in IRQ context and with del_timer_sync(). Might as well write it
up and place it in the comments above the code in del_timer_sync().
Perhaps the next time this lockdep dump triggers people will understand
the issues.
It is a ticky issue and very subtle, explaining it in detail in the code
may help others understand the issue when they stumble upon the bug
again.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1297186794.23343.19.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/timer.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
index d645992..5f40c2e 100644
--- a/kernel/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/timer.c
@@ -964,6 +964,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_to_del_timer_sync);
* add_timer_on(). Upon exit the timer is not queued and the handler is
* not running on any CPU.
*
+ * Note: You must not hold locks that are held in interrupt context
+ * while calling this function. Even if the lock has nothing to do
+ * with the timer in question. Here's why:
+ *
+ * CPU0 CPU1
+ * ---- ----
+ * <SOFTIRQ>
+ * call_timer_fn();
+ * base->running_timer = mytimer;
+ * spin_lock_irq(somelock);
+ * <IRQ>
+ * spin_lock(somelock);
+ * del_timer_sync(mytimer);
+ * while (base->running_timer == mytimer);
+ *
+ * Now del_timer_sync() will never return and never release somelock.
+ * The interrupt on the other CPU is waiting to grab somelock but
+ * it has interrupted the softirq that CPU0 is waiting to finish.
+ *
* The function returns whether it has deactivated a pending timer or not.
*/
int del_timer_sync(struct timer_list *timer)
@@ -971,6 +990,10 @@ int del_timer_sync(struct timer_list *timer)
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
unsigned long flags;
+ /*
+ * If lockdep gives a backtrace here, please reference
+ * the synchronization rules above.
+ */
local_irq_save(flags);
lock_map_acquire(&timer->lockdep_map);
lock_map_release(&timer->lockdep_map);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-03 3:19 Regression: WARNINGS and lockdep spews in 2.6.38-rc3+ (bisected) Nick Bowler
2011-02-03 9:12 ` Yong Zhang
2011-02-03 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-03 10:17 ` Yong Zhang
2011-02-03 10:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-03 11:42 ` Yong Zhang
2011-02-08 16:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-08 17:39 ` [PATCH] lockdep/timers: Explain in detail the locking problems del_timer_sync() may cause Steven Rostedt
2011-02-16 13:51 ` tip-bot for Steven Rostedt [this message]
2011-02-03 11:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] softirq: introduce loacal_bh_enable_force_wake() Yong Zhang
2011-02-03 11:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] timer: use local_bh_enable_force_wake() in del_timer_sync() Yong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-48228f7b470a74b6469a250d2977a13128d8fe96@git.kernel.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--subject='Re: [tip:core/locking] lockdep/timers: Explain in detail the locking problems del_timer_sync() may cause' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).