LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com> To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sched: don't disable bh when accessing action idr Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 13:12:49 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <vbflgcgnece.fsf@reg-r-vrt-018-180.mtr.labs.mlnx> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAM_iQpUKjFPKAONSW42_6Mdp-VTTvaOx-GPDH2bJqW7LW1QYBw@mail.gmail.com> On Sat 19 May 2018 at 02:59, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com> wrote: >> Underlying implementation of action map has changed and doesn't require >> disabling bh anymore. Replace all action idr spinlock usage with regular >> calls that do not disable bh. > > Please explain explicitly why it is not required, don't let people > dig, this would save everyone's time. Underlying implementation of actions lookup has changed from hashtable to idr. Every current action implementation just calls act_api lookup function instead of implementing its own lookup. I asked author of idr change if there is a reason to continue to use _bh versions and he replied that he just left them as-is. > > Also, this should be targeted for net-next, right? Right. > > Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-19 10:13 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-05-18 15:45 [PATCH] net: sched: don't disable bh when accessing action idr Vlad Buslov 2018-05-19 2:59 ` Cong Wang 2018-05-19 10:12 ` Vlad Buslov [this message] 2018-05-20 3:02 ` David Miller 2018-05-21 20:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2] " Vlad Buslov 2018-05-22 12:50 ` Jamal Hadi Salim 2018-05-23 1:10 ` Cong Wang 2018-05-23 6:57 ` Vlad Buslov 2018-05-23 7:32 ` Jiri Pirko 2018-05-23 8:52 ` [PATCH net-next v3] " Vlad Buslov 2018-05-23 23:14 ` Cong Wang 2018-05-24 16:54 ` Vlad Buslov
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=vbflgcgnece.fsf@reg-r-vrt-018-180.mtr.labs.mlnx \ --to=vladbu@mellanox.com \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \ --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).