LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com> To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: sched: don't disable bh when accessing action idr Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 19:54:26 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <vbfsh6hhu4d.fsf@reg-r-vrt-018-180.mtr.labs.mlnx> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAM_iQpWNRRND4+uav4Sqwe1ctsb_J61eueShaSkRmYeW1=KMJw@mail.gmail.com> On Wed 23 May 2018 at 23:14, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 1:52 AM, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com> wrote: >> Initial net_device implementation used ingress_lock spinlock to synchronize >> ingress path of device. This lock was used in both process and bh context. >> In some code paths action map lock was obtained while holding ingress_lock. >> Commit e1e992e52faa ("[NET_SCHED] protect action config/dump from irqs") >> modified actions to always disable bh, while using action map lock, in >> order to prevent deadlock on ingress_lock in softirq. This lock was removed >> in commit 555353cfa1ae ("netdev: The ingress_lock member is no longer >> needed."). >> >> Another reason to disable bh was filters delete code, that released actions >> in rcu callback. This code was changed to release actions from workqueue >> context in patch set "net_sched: close the race between call_rcu() and >> cleanup_net()". >> >> With these changes it is no longer necessary to continue disable bh while >> accessing action map. >> >> Replace all action idr spinlock usage with regular calls that do not >> disable bh. > > Looks much better now! > > I _guess_ we perhaps can even get rid of this spinlock since most of > the callers hold RTNL lock, not sure about the dump() path where > RTNL might be removed recently. Actually, this change is a result of discussion in code review of my patch set that removes RTNL dependency from TC rules update path. > > Anyway, > > Acked-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Thank you for reviewing my code!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-24 16:54 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-05-18 15:45 [PATCH] net: sched: don't disable bh when accessing action idr Vlad Buslov 2018-05-19 2:59 ` Cong Wang 2018-05-19 10:12 ` Vlad Buslov 2018-05-20 3:02 ` David Miller 2018-05-21 20:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2] " Vlad Buslov 2018-05-22 12:50 ` Jamal Hadi Salim 2018-05-23 1:10 ` Cong Wang 2018-05-23 6:57 ` Vlad Buslov 2018-05-23 7:32 ` Jiri Pirko 2018-05-23 8:52 ` [PATCH net-next v3] " Vlad Buslov 2018-05-23 23:14 ` Cong Wang 2018-05-24 16:54 ` Vlad Buslov [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=vbfsh6hhu4d.fsf@reg-r-vrt-018-180.mtr.labs.mlnx \ --to=vladbu@mellanox.com \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \ --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).