From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264889AbUEQE0r (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2004 00:26:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264888AbUEQE0r (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2004 00:26:47 -0400 Received: from [202.141.25.89] ([202.141.25.89]:65504 "EHLO cello.cs.iitm.ernet.in") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264889AbUEQE0q (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2004 00:26:46 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: swsusp also stores system clock From: Rajsekar Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 09:54:51 +0530 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I started liking swsusp so much that I dont shutdown my system anymore, I just suspend. Is this wrong? But I noticed that the clock also gets saved and when I resume my system, the clock is annoyingly wrong. I suppose that this is done on purpose for some reasons by the developers. Currently, I use hwclock to set my system clock on resume. Is there a better way or a patch ? -- M Rajsekar IIT Madras