Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: <hch@infradead.org>, <kw@linux.com>, <logang@deltatee.com>,
<leon@kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
<rajur@chelsio.com>, <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
<linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 8/9] PCI/IOV: Add 10-Bit Tag sysfs files for VF devices
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 16:47:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <035fbe52-379e-ba6f-52d1-400d2197860e@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210805000525.GA1693795@bjorn-Precision-5520>
On 2021/8/5 8:05, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 09:47:07PM +0800, Dongdong Liu wrote:
>> PCIe spec 5.0 r1.0 section 2.2.6.2 says that if an Endpoint supports
>> sending Requests to other Endpoints (as opposed to host memory), the
>> Endpoint must not send 10-Bit Tag Requests to another given Endpoint
>> unless an implementation-specific mechanism determines that the
>> Endpoint supports 10-Bit Tag Completer capability.
>> Add sriov_vf_10bit_tag file to query the status of VF 10-Bit Tag
>> Requester Enable. Add sriov_vf_10bit_tag_ctl file to disable the VF
>> 10-Bit Tag Requester. The typical use case is for p2pdma when the peer
>> device does not support 10-BIT Tag Completer.
>
> Fix the usual spec quoting issue. Or maybe this is not actually
> quoted but is missing blank lines between paragraphs.
Will fix.
>
> s/10-BIT/10-Bit/
Will fix.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci | 20 +++++++++++++
>> drivers/pci/iov.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci
>> index 0e0c97d..8fdbfae 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci
>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci
>> @@ -421,3 +421,23 @@ Description:
>> to disable 10-Bit Tag Requester when the driver does not bind
>> the deivce. The typical use case is for p2pdma when the peer
>> device does not support 10-BIT Tag Completer.
>> +
>> +What: /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../sriov_vf_10bit_tag
>> +Date: August 2021
>> +Contact: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
>> +Description:
>> + This file is associated with a SR-IOV physical function (PF).
>> + It is visible when the device has VF 10-Bit Tag Requester
>> + Supported. It contains the status of VF 10-Bit Tag Requester
>> + Enable. The file is only readable.
>
> s/only readable/read-only/
Will fix.
>
>> +What: /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../sriov_vf_10bit_tag_ctl
>
> Why does this file have "_ctl" on the end when the one in patch 7/9
> does not?
>
>> +Date: August 2021
>> +Contact: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
>> +Description:
>> + This file is associated with a SR-IOV virtual function (VF).
>> + It is visible when the device has VF 10-Bit Tag Requester
>> + Supported. It only allows to write 0 to disable VF 10-Bit
>> + Tag Requester. The file is only writeable when the vf driver
>> + does not bind to a dirver. The typical use case is for p2pdma
>> + when the peer device does not support 10-BIT Tag Completer.
>
> s/vf/VF/
> s/dirver/driver/
> s/10-BIT/10-Bit/
Will fix.
>
> "when the vr driver does not bind to a driver"? Not quite right.
> Must be a "device" in there somewhere.
Will fix.
>
> So IIUC this file is associated with a VF, but the bit it writes is
> actually in the *PF*? So writing 0 to any VF's file disables 10-bit
> tags for *all* VFs? That's worth mentioning here.
Yes, will do.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/iov.c b/drivers/pci/iov.c
>> index 0d0bed1..04c1298 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/iov.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/iov.c
>> @@ -220,10 +220,38 @@ static ssize_t sriov_vf_msix_count_store(struct device *dev,
>> static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(sriov_vf_msix_count);
>> #endif
>>
>> +static ssize_t sriov_vf_10bit_tag_ctl_store(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_dev *vf_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = pci_physfn(vf_dev);
>> + struct pci_sriov *iov;
>> + bool enable;
>> +
>> + if (kstrtobool(buf, &enable) < 0)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (enable != false)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> Is this "if (enable)" again?
Will fix.
>
>> + if (vf_dev->driver)
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> +
>> + iov = pdev->sriov;
>> + iov->ctrl &= ~PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VF_10BIT_TAG_REQ_EN;
>> + pci_write_config_word(pdev, iov->pos + PCI_SRIOV_CTRL, iov->ctrl);
>> + pci_info(pdev, "disabled SRIOV 10-Bit Tag Requester\n");
>
> s/SRIOV/SR-IOV/ to match spec and other usages.
Will fix.
Thanks,
Dongdong
>
>> +
>> + return count;
>> +}
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(sriov_vf_10bit_tag_ctl);
>> +
>> static struct attribute *sriov_vf_dev_attrs[] = {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>> &dev_attr_sriov_vf_msix_count.attr,
>> #endif
>> + &dev_attr_sriov_vf_10bit_tag_ctl.attr,
>> NULL,
>> };
>>
>> @@ -236,6 +264,11 @@ static umode_t sriov_vf_attrs_are_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
>> if (!pdev->is_virtfn)
>> return 0;
>>
>> + pdev = pci_physfn(pdev);
>> + if ((a == &dev_attr_sriov_vf_10bit_tag_ctl.attr) &&
>> + !(pdev->sriov->cap & PCI_SRIOV_CAP_VF_10BIT_TAG_REQ))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> return a->mode;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -487,12 +520,23 @@ static ssize_t sriov_drivers_autoprobe_store(struct device *dev,
>> return count;
>> }
>>
>> +static ssize_t sriov_vf_10bit_tag_show(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>> +
>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n",
>> + !!(pdev->sriov->ctrl & PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VF_10BIT_TAG_REQ_EN));
>> +}
>> +
>> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(sriov_totalvfs);
>> static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(sriov_numvfs);
>> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(sriov_offset);
>> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(sriov_stride);
>> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(sriov_vf_device);
>> static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(sriov_drivers_autoprobe);
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(sriov_vf_10bit_tag);
>>
>> static struct attribute *sriov_pf_dev_attrs[] = {
>> &dev_attr_sriov_totalvfs.attr,
>> @@ -501,6 +545,7 @@ static struct attribute *sriov_pf_dev_attrs[] = {
>> &dev_attr_sriov_stride.attr,
>> &dev_attr_sriov_vf_device.attr,
>> &dev_attr_sriov_drivers_autoprobe.attr,
>> + &dev_attr_sriov_vf_10bit_tag.attr,
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>> &dev_attr_sriov_vf_total_msix.attr,
>> #endif
>> @@ -511,10 +556,15 @@ static umode_t sriov_pf_attrs_are_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
>> struct attribute *a, int n)
>> {
>> struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>>
>> if (!dev_is_pf(dev))
>> return 0;
>>
>> + if ((a == &dev_attr_sriov_vf_10bit_tag.attr) &&
>> + !(pdev->sriov->cap & PCI_SRIOV_CAP_VF_10BIT_TAG_REQ))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> return a->mode;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-05 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-04 13:46 [PATCH V7 0/9] PCI: Enable 10-Bit tag support for PCIe devices Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 1/9] PCI: Use cached Device Capabilities Register Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 2/9] PCI: Use cached Device Capabilities 2 Register Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 3/9] PCI: Add 10-Bit Tag register definitions Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 4/9] PCI: Enable 10-Bit Tag support for PCIe Endpoint devices Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 23:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-05 7:47 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-05 19:54 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-07 6:19 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 5/9] PCI/IOV: Enable 10-Bit tag support for PCIe VF devices Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 23:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-05 8:03 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-06 22:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-07 7:46 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 6/9] PCI: Enable 10-Bit Tag support for PCIe RP devices Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 23:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-05 8:25 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-09 17:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-10 11:59 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 7/9] PCI/sysfs: Add a 10-Bit Tag sysfs file Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 15:51 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2021-08-05 13:14 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-05 13:53 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-08-05 15:36 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2021-08-04 23:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-05 8:37 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-05 15:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-07 7:01 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-09 17:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-10 12:16 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 23:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-05 8:38 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 8/9] PCI/IOV: Add 10-Bit Tag sysfs files for VF devices Dongdong Liu
2021-08-05 0:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-05 8:47 ` Dongdong Liu [this message]
2021-08-05 9:39 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 9/9] PCI/P2PDMA: Add a 10-Bit Tag check in P2PDMA Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 15:56 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2021-08-05 8:49 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-05 18:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-07 7:11 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-09 17:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-10 12:31 ` Dongdong Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=035fbe52-379e-ba6f-52d1-400d2197860e@huawei.com \
--to=liudongdong3@huawei.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rajur@chelsio.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH V7 8/9] PCI/IOV: Add 10-Bit Tag sysfs files for VF devices' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).