Netdev Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <>
To: M Chetan Kumar <>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
	Linux Netdev List <>,
Subject: wwan/iosm vs. xmm7360
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 22:39:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)

Hi Chetan,

at the risk of having missed this being answered already:

How close is the older xmm7360 to the now supported xmm7560 in mainline?

There is that reverse engineered PCI driver [1] with non-standard
userland interface, and it would obviously be great to benefit from
common infrastructure and specifically the modem-manager compatible
interface. Is this realistic to achieve for the 7360, or is that
hardware or its firmware too different?



Siemens AG, T RDA IOT
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

             reply	other threads:[~2021-08-05 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-05 20:39 Jan Kiszka [this message]
2021-08-06  9:29 ` Kumar, M Chetan
2021-08-06  9:41   ` Jan Kiszka
2021-09-07 18:01     ` Florian Klink

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: wwan/iosm vs. xmm7360' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).