Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: <helgaas@kernel.org>, <hch@infradead.org>, <kw@linux.com>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <rajur@chelsio.com>,
	<hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>, <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 7/8] PCI: Add "pci=disable_10bit_tag=" parameter for peer-to-peer support
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 22:00:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12c7f276-6869-a432-a138-4fce88da87e3@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bc9b7b00-40eb-7d4e-f3b3-1d4174f10be5@deltatee.com>



On 2021/7/26 23:48, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-07-25 12:39 a.m., Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 10:20:50AM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2021-07-23 5:32 a.m., Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 07:06:41PM +0800, Dongdong Liu wrote:
>>>>> PCIe spec 5.0 r1.0 section 2.2.6.2 says that if an Endpoint supports
>>>>> sending Requests to other Endpoints (as opposed to host memory), the
>>>>> Endpoint must not send 10-Bit Tag Requests to another given Endpoint
>>>>> unless an implementation-specific mechanism determines that the Endpoint
>>>>> supports 10-Bit Tag Completer capability. Add "pci=disable_10bit_tag="
>>>>> parameter to disable 10-Bit Tag Requester if the peer device does not
>>>>> support the 10-Bit Tag Completer. This will make P2P traffic safe.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt |  7 ++++
>>>>>  drivers/pci/pci.c                               | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  drivers/pci/pci.h                               |  1 +
>>>>>  drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c                  | 13 +++---
>>>>>  drivers/pci/probe.c                             |  9 ++--
>>>>>  5 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>>>> index bdb2200..c2c4585 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>>>> @@ -4019,6 +4019,13 @@
>>>>>  				bridges without forcing it upstream. Note:
>>>>>  				this removes isolation between devices and
>>>>>  				may put more devices in an IOMMU group.
>>>>> +		disable_10bit_tag=<pci_dev>[; ...]
>>>>> +				  Specify one or more PCI devices (in the format
>>>>> +				  specified above) separated by semicolons.
>>>>> +				  Disable 10-Bit Tag Requester if the peer
>>>>> +				  device does not support the 10-Bit Tag
>>>>> +				  Completer.This will make P2P traffic safe.
>>>>
>>>> I can't imagine more awkward user experience than such kernel parameter.
>>>>
>>>> As a user, I will need to boot the system, hope for the best that system
>>>> works, write down all PCI device numbers, guess which one doesn't work
>>>> properly, update grub with new command line argument and reboot the
>>>> system. Any HW change and this dance should be repeated.
>>>
>>> There are already two such PCI parameters with this pattern and they are
>>> not that awkward. pci_dev may be specified with either vendor/device IDS
>>> or with a path of BDFs (which protects against renumbering).
>>
>> Unfortunately, in the real world, BDF is not so stable. It changes with
>> addition of new hardware, BIOS upgrades and even broken servers.
>
> That's why it supports using a *path* of BDFs which tends not to catch
> the wrong device if the topology changes.
>
>> Vendor/device IDs doesn't work if you have multiple devices of same
>> vendor in the system.
>
> Yes, but it's fine for some use cases. That's why there's a range of
> options.
>
>>>
>>> This flag is only useful in P2PDMA traffic, and if the user attempts
>>> such a transfer, it prints a warning (see the next patch) with the exact
>>> parameter that needs to be added to the command line.
>>
>> Dongdong citied PCI spec and it was very clear - don't enable this
>> feature unless you clearly know that it is safe to enable. This is
>> completely opposite to the proposal here - always enable and disable
>> if something is printed to the dmesg.
>
> Quoting from patch 4:
>
> "For platforms where the RC supports 10-Bit Tag Completer capability,
> it is highly recommended for platform firmware or operating software
> that configures PCIe hierarchies to Set the 10-Bit Tag Requester Enable
> bit automatically in Endpoints with 10-Bit Tag Requester capability.
> This enables the important class of 10-Bit Tag capable adapters that
> send Memory Read Requests only to host memory."
>
> Notice the last sentence. It's saying that devices who only talk to host
> memory should have 10-bit tags enabled. In the kernel we call devices
> that talk to things besides host memory "P2PDMA". So the spec is saying
> not to enable 10bit tags for devices participating in P2PDMA. The kernel
> needs a way to allow users to do that. The kernel parameter only stops
> the feature from being enabled for a specific device, and the only
> use-case is P2PDMA which is not that common and requires the user to be
> aware of their topology. So I really don't think this is that big a problem.
>
>>>
>>> This has worked well for disable_acs_redir and was used for
>>> resource_alignment before that for quite some time. So save a better
>>> suggestion I think this is more than acceptable.
>>
>> I don't know about other parameters and their history, but we are not in
>> 90s anymore and addition of modules parameters (for the PCI it is kernel
>> cmdline arguments) are better to be changed to some configuration tool/sysfs.
>
> The problem was that the ACS bits had to be set before the kernel
> enumerated the devices. The IOMMU code simply was not able to support
> dynamic adjustments to its groups. I assume changing 10bit tags
> dynamically is similarly tricky -- but if it's not then, yes a sysfs
> interface in addition to the kernel parameter would be a good idea.
PCIe spec 5.0 section 7.5.3.16 Device Control 2 Register
10-Bit Tag Requester Enable says that
If software changes the value of this bit while the Function
has outstanding Non-Posted Requests, the result is undefined.

So 10-Bit Tag Requester Enable should be set before probe the device 
driver.

Thanks,
Dongdong
>
> Logan
> .
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-27 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-23 11:06 [PATCH V6 0/8] PCI: Enable 10-Bit tag support for PCIe devices Dongdong Liu
2021-07-23 11:06 ` [PATCH V6 1/8] PCI: Use cached Device Capabilities Register Dongdong Liu
2021-07-23 11:06 ` [PATCH V6 2/8] PCI: Use cached Device Capabilities 2 Register Dongdong Liu
2021-07-23 11:06 ` [PATCH V6 3/8] PCI: Add 10-Bit Tag register definitions Dongdong Liu
2021-07-23 11:06 ` [PATCH V6 4/8] PCI: Enable 10-Bit tag support for PCIe Endpoint devices Dongdong Liu
2021-07-23 11:06 ` [PATCH V6 5/8] PCI/IOV: Enable 10-Bit tag support for PCIe VF devices Dongdong Liu
2021-07-23 11:06 ` [PATCH V6 6/8] PCI: Enable 10-Bit tag support for PCIe RP devices Dongdong Liu
2021-07-23 11:06 ` [PATCH V6 7/8] PCI: Add "pci=disable_10bit_tag=" parameter for peer-to-peer support Dongdong Liu
2021-07-23 11:32   ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-07-23 16:20     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2021-07-25  6:39       ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-07-26 15:48         ` Logan Gunthorpe
2021-07-27 11:05           ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-07-27 14:30             ` Dongdong Liu
2021-07-27 15:41               ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-07-27 14:00           ` Dongdong Liu [this message]
2021-07-23 16:58   ` kernel test robot
2021-07-24 10:35     ` Dongdong Liu
2021-07-23 11:06 ` [PATCH V6 8/8] PCI/P2PDMA: Add a 10-bit tag check in P2PDMA Dongdong Liu
2021-07-23 16:25   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2021-07-24 10:36     ` Dongdong Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12c7f276-6869-a432-a138-4fce88da87e3@huawei.com \
    --to=liudongdong3@huawei.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rajur@chelsio.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH V6 7/8] PCI: Add "pci=disable_10bit_tag=" parameter for peer-to-peer support' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).