Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: subashab@codeaurora.org
To: Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@aleksander.es>
Cc: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>, "Daniele Palmas" <dnlplm@gmail.com>,
"Network Development" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Sean Tranchetti" <stranche@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: RMNET QMAP data aggregation with size greater than 16384
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 12:42:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13972ac97ffe7a10fd85fe03dc84dc02@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAP7ucJRbg58Yqcx-qFFUuu=_=3Ss1HE1ZW4XGrm0KsSXnwdmA@mail.gmail.com>
> I tried with a SIMCOM 7600E, with data aggregation enabled with QMAPv1:
>
> $ sudo qmicli -d /dev/cdc-wdm0 -p --wda-get-data-format
> [/dev/cdc-wdm0] Successfully got data format
> QoS flow header: no
> Link layer protocol: 'raw-ip'
> Uplink data aggregation protocol: 'qmap'
> Downlink data aggregation protocol: 'qmap'
> NDP signature: '0'
> Downlink data aggregation max datagrams: '10'
> Downlink data aggregation max size: '4096'
>
> As you suggested, the MTU of the new muxed interface is set to 1500
> and the MTU of the master interface to only 4 more bytes (1504):
>
> # ip link
> 8: wwp0s20f0u8u4i5: <POINTOPOINT,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1504 qdisc fq_codel
> state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
> link/none
> 9: qmapmux0.0@wwp0s20f0u8u4i5: <UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel
> state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
> link/[519]
>
> Under this scenario, the downlink is completely broken (speedtest
> 0.39Mbps), while the uplink seems to work (speedtest 13Mbps).
>
> If I use the logic I had before, associating the downlink data
> aggregation max size reported by the module to the MTU of the master
> interface, same as I had to do when using qmi_wwan add_mux/del_mux,
> then it works properly:
>
> # ip link
> 14: wwp0s20f0u8u4i5: <POINTOPOINT,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 4096 qdisc fq_codel
> state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
> link/none
> 15: qmapmux0.0@wwp0s20f0u8u4i5: <UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel
> state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
> link/[519]
>
> Downlink is now 26Mbps and uplink still 13Mbps.
>
> Is there something I'm doing wrong? Or do we really need to do the
> same thing as in qmi_wwan add_mux/del_mux; i.e. configuring the master
> interface MTU to be the same as the downlink max aggregation data size
> so that we change the rx_urb_size?
Unfortunately, this seems to be a limitation of qmi_wwan (usbnet)
where its tying the RX to the TX size through usbnet_change_mtu.
Ideally, we should break this dependency and have a sysfs or some other
configuration scheme to set the rx_urb_size.
Looks like this discussion has happened a while back and the option to
use
a configurable scheme for rx_urb_size was rejected by Bjorn and Greg KH.
The summary of the thread was to set a large rx_urb_size during probe
itself for qmi_wwan.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-usb/patch/20200803065105.8997-1-yzc666@netease.com/
We could try setting a large value as suggested there and it should
hopefully
solve the issue you are seeing.
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-06 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-31 22:45 RMNET QMAP data aggregation with size greater than 16384 Aleksander Morgado
2021-08-05 19:10 ` subashab
2021-08-05 20:32 ` Aleksander Morgado
[not found] ` <CAGRyCJHYkH4_FvTzk7BFwjMN=iOTN_Y2=4ueY=s3rJMQO9j7uw@mail.gmail.com>
2021-08-05 21:01 ` Aleksander Morgado
2021-08-05 21:12 ` Daniele Palmas
2021-08-05 22:57 ` subashab
2021-08-06 14:08 ` Aleksander Morgado
2021-08-06 18:42 ` subashab [this message]
2021-08-06 19:58 ` Bjørn Mork
2021-08-06 20:22 ` Aleksander Morgado
2021-08-06 22:30 ` subashab
2021-08-07 10:55 ` Bjørn Mork
2021-08-09 21:40 ` subashab
2021-08-12 12:02 ` Daniele Palmas
2021-08-13 6:21 ` subashab
2021-08-13 6:25 ` Bjørn Mork
2021-09-03 13:55 ` Daniele Palmas
2021-09-08 6:21 ` subashab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13972ac97ffe7a10fd85fe03dc84dc02@codeaurora.org \
--to=subashab@codeaurora.org \
--cc=aleksander@aleksander.es \
--cc=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=dnlplm@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stranche@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).