Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
To: <helgaas@kernel.org>, <hch@infradead.org>, <kw@linux.com>,
<logang@deltatee.com>, <leon@kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <rajur@chelsio.com>,
<hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
Cc: <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH V7 6/9] PCI: Enable 10-Bit Tag support for PCIe RP devices
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 21:47:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1628084828-119542-7-git-send-email-liudongdong3@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1628084828-119542-1-git-send-email-liudongdong3@huawei.com>
PCIe spec 5.0r1.0 section 2.2.6.2 implementation note, In configurations
where a Requester with 10-Bit Tag Requester capability needs to target
multiple Completers, one needs to ensure that the Requester sends 10-Bit
Tag Requests only to Completers that have 10-Bit Tag Completer capability.
So we enable 10-Bit Tag Requester for root port only when the devices
under the root port support 10-Bit Tag Completer.
Signed-off-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
---
drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
index c7ff1ee..2382cd2 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
@@ -90,6 +90,72 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops pcie_portdrv_pm_ops = {
#define PCIE_PORTDRV_PM_OPS NULL
#endif /* !PM */
+static int pci_10bit_tag_comp_support(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
+{
+ bool *support = (bool *)data;
+
+ if (!pci_is_pcie(dev)) {
+ *support = false;
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * PCIe spec 5.0r1.0 section 2.2.6.2 implementation note.
+ * For configurations where a Requester with 10-Bit Tag Requester
+ * capability targets Completers where some do and some do not have
+ * 10-Bit Tag Completer capability, how the Requester determines which
+ * NPRs include 10-Bit Tags is outside the scope of this specification.
+ * So we do not consider hotplug scenario.
+ */
+ if (dev->is_hotplug_bridge) {
+ *support = false;
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ if (!(dev->pcie_devcap2 & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_10BIT_TAG_COMP)) {
+ *support = false;
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void pci_configure_rp_10bit_tag(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+ bool support = true;
+
+ if (dev->subordinate == NULL)
+ return;
+
+ /* If no devices under the root port, no need to enable 10-Bit Tag. */
+ if (list_empty(&dev->subordinate->devices))
+ return;
+
+ pci_10bit_tag_comp_support(dev, &support);
+ if (!support)
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * PCIe spec 5.0r1.0 section 2.2.6.2 implementation note.
+ * In configurations where a Requester with 10-Bit Tag Requester
+ * capability needs to target multiple Completers, one needs to ensure
+ * that the Requester sends 10-Bit Tag Requests only to Completers
+ * that have 10-Bit Tag Completer capability. So we enable 10-Bit Tag
+ * Requester for root port only when the devices under the root port
+ * support 10-Bit Tag Completer.
+ */
+ pci_walk_bus(dev->subordinate, pci_10bit_tag_comp_support, &support);
+ if (!support)
+ return;
+
+ if (!(dev->pcie_devcap2 & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_10BIT_TAG_REQ))
+ return;
+
+ pci_dbg(dev, "enabling 10-Bit Tag Requester\n");
+ pcie_capability_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,
+ PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_10BIT_TAG_REQ_EN);
+}
+
/*
* pcie_portdrv_probe - Probe PCI-Express port devices
* @dev: PCI-Express port device being probed
@@ -111,6 +177,9 @@ static int pcie_portdrv_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
(type != PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC)))
return -ENODEV;
+ if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
+ pci_configure_rp_10bit_tag(dev);
+
if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC)
pcie_link_rcec(dev);
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-04 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-04 13:46 [PATCH V7 0/9] PCI: Enable 10-Bit tag support for PCIe devices Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 1/9] PCI: Use cached Device Capabilities Register Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 2/9] PCI: Use cached Device Capabilities 2 Register Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 3/9] PCI: Add 10-Bit Tag register definitions Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 4/9] PCI: Enable 10-Bit Tag support for PCIe Endpoint devices Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 23:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-05 7:47 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-05 19:54 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-07 6:19 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 5/9] PCI/IOV: Enable 10-Bit tag support for PCIe VF devices Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 23:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-05 8:03 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-06 22:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-07 7:46 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` Dongdong Liu [this message]
2021-08-04 23:38 ` [PATCH V7 6/9] PCI: Enable 10-Bit Tag support for PCIe RP devices Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-05 8:25 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-09 17:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-10 11:59 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 7/9] PCI/sysfs: Add a 10-Bit Tag sysfs file Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 15:51 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2021-08-05 13:14 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-05 13:53 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-08-05 15:36 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2021-08-04 23:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-05 8:37 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-05 15:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-07 7:01 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-09 17:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-10 12:16 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 23:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-05 8:38 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 8/9] PCI/IOV: Add 10-Bit Tag sysfs files for VF devices Dongdong Liu
2021-08-05 0:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-05 8:47 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-05 9:39 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 9/9] PCI/P2PDMA: Add a 10-Bit Tag check in P2PDMA Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 15:56 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2021-08-05 8:49 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-05 18:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-07 7:11 ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-09 17:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-10 12:31 ` Dongdong Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1628084828-119542-7-git-send-email-liudongdong3@huawei.com \
--to=liudongdong3@huawei.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rajur@chelsio.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH V7 6/9] PCI: Enable 10-Bit Tag support for PCIe RP devices' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).