Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com>
Cc: ihuguet@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	ecree.xilinx@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	dinang@xilinx.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next] sfc: The size of the RX recycle ring should be more flexible
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2022 05:10:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <164377861092.30544.4725309458508653960.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220131111054.cp4f6foyinaarwbn@gmail.com>

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:10:54 +0000 you wrote:
> Ideally the size would depend on the link speed, but the recycle
> ring is created when the interface is brought up before the driver
> knows the link speed. So size it for the maximum speed of a given NIC.
> PowerPC is only supported on SFN7xxx and SFN8xxx NICs.
> 
> With this patch on a 40G NIC the number of calls to alloc_pages and
> friends went down from about 18% to under 2%.
> On a 10G NIC the number of calls to alloc_pages and friends went down
> from about 15% to 0 (perf did not capture any calls during the 60
> second test).
> On a 100G NIC the number of calls to alloc_pages and friends went down
> from about 23% to 4%.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [V2,net-next] sfc: The size of the RX recycle ring should be more flexible
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/000fe940e51f

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      reply	other threads:[~2022-02-02  5:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-18 15:14 Bad performance in RX with sfc 40G Íñigo Huguet
2021-11-18 17:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-12-02 14:26   ` Íñigo Huguet
2021-11-20  8:31 ` Martin Habets
2021-12-09 12:06   ` Íñigo Huguet
2021-12-23 13:18     ` Íñigo Huguet
2022-01-02  9:22       ` Martin Habets
2022-01-10  8:58         ` [PATCH net-next] sfc: The size of the RX recycle ring should be more flexible Martin Habets
2022-01-10  9:31           ` Íñigo Huguet
2022-01-12  9:05             ` Martin Habets
2022-01-31 11:08             ` Martin Habets
2022-01-10 17:22           ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-01-12  9:08             ` Martin Habets
2022-01-31 11:10           ` [PATCH V2 " Martin Habets
2022-02-02  5:10             ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=164377861092.30544.4725309458508653960.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dinang@xilinx.com \
    --cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
    --cc=habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com \
    --cc=ihuguet@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH V2 net-next] sfc: The size of the RX recycle ring should be more flexible' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).