From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F5EC433E1 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 17:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906EE206D7 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 17:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727882AbgGYRll (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jul 2020 13:41:41 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:55374 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726904AbgGYRll (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jul 2020 13:41:41 -0400 Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1jzOAs-006pfz-Kt; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 19:41:30 +0200 Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 19:41:30 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Helmut Grohne Cc: Woojung Huh , Microchip Linux Driver Support , Vivien Didelot , Florian Fainelli , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net: dsa: microchip: delete dead code Message-ID: <20200725174130.GL1472201@lunn.ch> References: <20200721083300.GA12970@laureti-dev> <20200722143953.GA1339445@lunn.ch> <20200723042431.GA14746@laureti-dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200723042431.GA14746@laureti-dev> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 06:24:31AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 04:39:53PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > This patch probably is correct. But it is not obviously correct, > > because there are so many changes at once. Please could you break it > > up. > > >From my pov, it is less a question of whether it is correct, but whether > it goes into the desired direction. There are a few comments in the > driver that point to pending work. It might as well be that I'm removing > the infrastructure that other patches are meant to build upon. Hi Helmut There was a small burst of patches from Microchip in this month. But apart from that, you need to go a long way back. I say clean it up now. The code is in the git history, so it is easy to get back if needed. Andrew