* [RFC 1/4] netlink: consistently use NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN()
2020-08-05 14:03 [RFC 0/4] netlink: binary attribute range validation Johannes Berg
@ 2020-08-05 14:03 ` Johannes Berg
2020-08-05 14:03 ` [RFC 2/4] netlink: consistently use NLA_POLICY_MIN_LEN() Johannes Berg
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2020-08-05 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless, netdev; +Cc: Johannes Berg
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Change places that open-code NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN() to
use the macro instead, giving us flexibility in how we
handle the details of the macro.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/wireguard/netlink.c | 10 +++++-----
net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 4 ++--
net/bridge/br_vlan.c | 4 ++--
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 4 ++--
net/sched/act_ct.c | 8 +++-----
net/sched/act_ctinfo.c | 5 ++---
net/sched/act_gate.c | 4 ++--
net/wireless/nl80211.c | 6 ++----
8 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireguard/netlink.c b/drivers/net/wireguard/netlink.c
index 20a4f3c0a0a1..0e6c6eb9384e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireguard/netlink.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/netlink.c
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ static struct genl_family genl_family;
static const struct nla_policy device_policy[WGDEVICE_A_MAX + 1] = {
[WGDEVICE_A_IFINDEX] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
[WGDEVICE_A_IFNAME] = { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING, .len = IFNAMSIZ - 1 },
- [WGDEVICE_A_PRIVATE_KEY] = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN, .len = NOISE_PUBLIC_KEY_LEN },
- [WGDEVICE_A_PUBLIC_KEY] = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN, .len = NOISE_PUBLIC_KEY_LEN },
+ [WGDEVICE_A_PRIVATE_KEY] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(NOISE_PUBLIC_KEY_LEN),
+ [WGDEVICE_A_PUBLIC_KEY] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(NOISE_PUBLIC_KEY_LEN),
[WGDEVICE_A_FLAGS] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
[WGDEVICE_A_LISTEN_PORT] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
[WGDEVICE_A_FWMARK] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
@@ -31,12 +31,12 @@ static const struct nla_policy device_policy[WGDEVICE_A_MAX + 1] = {
};
static const struct nla_policy peer_policy[WGPEER_A_MAX + 1] = {
- [WGPEER_A_PUBLIC_KEY] = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN, .len = NOISE_PUBLIC_KEY_LEN },
- [WGPEER_A_PRESHARED_KEY] = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN, .len = NOISE_SYMMETRIC_KEY_LEN },
+ [WGPEER_A_PUBLIC_KEY] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(NOISE_PUBLIC_KEY_LEN),
+ [WGPEER_A_PRESHARED_KEY] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(NOISE_SYMMETRIC_KEY_LEN),
[WGPEER_A_FLAGS] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
[WGPEER_A_ENDPOINT] = { .type = NLA_MIN_LEN, .len = sizeof(struct sockaddr) },
[WGPEER_A_PERSISTENT_KEEPALIVE_INTERVAL] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
- [WGPEER_A_LAST_HANDSHAKE_TIME] = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN, .len = sizeof(struct __kernel_timespec) },
+ [WGPEER_A_LAST_HANDSHAKE_TIME] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct __kernel_timespec)),
[WGPEER_A_RX_BYTES] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
[WGPEER_A_TX_BYTES] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
[WGPEER_A_ALLOWEDIPS] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
index 240e260e3461..fd850ae78e15 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
@@ -1069,8 +1069,8 @@ static const struct nla_policy br_policy[IFLA_BR_MAX + 1] = {
[IFLA_BR_MCAST_IGMP_VERSION] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
[IFLA_BR_MCAST_MLD_VERSION] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
[IFLA_BR_VLAN_STATS_PER_PORT] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
- [IFLA_BR_MULTI_BOOLOPT] = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
- .len = sizeof(struct br_boolopt_multi) },
+ [IFLA_BR_MULTI_BOOLOPT] =
+ NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct br_boolopt_multi)),
};
static int br_changelink(struct net_device *brdev, struct nlattr *tb[],
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
index f9092c71225f..d2b8737f9fc0 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
@@ -1884,8 +1884,8 @@ static int br_vlan_rtm_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
}
static const struct nla_policy br_vlan_db_policy[BRIDGE_VLANDB_ENTRY_MAX + 1] = {
- [BRIDGE_VLANDB_ENTRY_INFO] = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
- .len = sizeof(struct bridge_vlan_info) },
+ [BRIDGE_VLANDB_ENTRY_INFO] =
+ NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct bridge_vlan_info)),
[BRIDGE_VLANDB_ENTRY_RANGE] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
[BRIDGE_VLANDB_ENTRY_STATE] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
[BRIDGE_VLANDB_ENTRY_TUNNEL_INFO] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index b78edf237ba0..86291c5aaae5 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -384,8 +384,8 @@ mptcp_pm_addr_policy[MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_MAX + 1] = {
[MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_FAMILY] = { .type = NLA_U16, },
[MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_ID] = { .type = NLA_U8, },
[MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_ADDR4] = { .type = NLA_U32, },
- [MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_ADDR6] = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
- .len = sizeof(struct in6_addr), },
+ [MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_ADDR6] =
+ NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct in6_addr)),
[MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_PORT] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
[MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_FLAGS] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
[MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_IF_IDX] = { .type = NLA_S32 },
diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
index 6ed1652d1e26..a62a86cc06f6 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
@@ -1035,7 +1035,7 @@ static int tcf_ct_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
static const struct nla_policy ct_policy[TCA_CT_MAX + 1] = {
[TCA_CT_ACTION] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
- [TCA_CT_PARMS] = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN, .len = sizeof(struct tc_ct) },
+ [TCA_CT_PARMS] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct tc_ct)),
[TCA_CT_ZONE] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
[TCA_CT_MARK] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
[TCA_CT_MARK_MASK] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
@@ -1045,10 +1045,8 @@ static const struct nla_policy ct_policy[TCA_CT_MAX + 1] = {
.len = 128 / BITS_PER_BYTE },
[TCA_CT_NAT_IPV4_MIN] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
[TCA_CT_NAT_IPV4_MAX] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
- [TCA_CT_NAT_IPV6_MIN] = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
- .len = sizeof(struct in6_addr) },
- [TCA_CT_NAT_IPV6_MAX] = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
- .len = sizeof(struct in6_addr) },
+ [TCA_CT_NAT_IPV6_MIN] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct in6_addr)),
+ [TCA_CT_NAT_IPV6_MAX] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct in6_addr)),
[TCA_CT_NAT_PORT_MIN] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
[TCA_CT_NAT_PORT_MAX] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
};
diff --git a/net/sched/act_ctinfo.c b/net/sched/act_ctinfo.c
index b5042f3ea079..e88fa19ea8a9 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_ctinfo.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_ctinfo.c
@@ -144,9 +144,8 @@ static int tcf_ctinfo_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
}
static const struct nla_policy ctinfo_policy[TCA_CTINFO_MAX + 1] = {
- [TCA_CTINFO_ACT] = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
- .len = sizeof(struct
- tc_ctinfo) },
+ [TCA_CTINFO_ACT] =
+ NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct tc_ctinfo)),
[TCA_CTINFO_ZONE] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
[TCA_CTINFO_PARMS_DSCP_MASK] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
[TCA_CTINFO_PARMS_DSCP_STATEMASK] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
diff --git a/net/sched/act_gate.c b/net/sched/act_gate.c
index 323ae7f6315d..c93f22e8f02b 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_gate.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_gate.c
@@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ static const struct nla_policy entry_policy[TCA_GATE_ENTRY_MAX + 1] = {
};
static const struct nla_policy gate_policy[TCA_GATE_MAX + 1] = {
- [TCA_GATE_PARMS] = { .len = sizeof(struct tc_gate),
- .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN },
+ [TCA_GATE_PARMS] =
+ NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct tc_gate)),
[TCA_GATE_PRIORITY] = { .type = NLA_S32 },
[TCA_GATE_ENTRY_LIST] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
[TCA_GATE_BASE_TIME] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
diff --git a/net/wireless/nl80211.c b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
index 57b989d53064..248e845ebd5b 100644
--- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c
+++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
@@ -659,10 +659,8 @@ static const struct nla_policy nl80211_policy[NUM_NL80211_ATTR] = {
[NL80211_ATTR_RECEIVE_MULTICAST] = { .type = NLA_FLAG },
[NL80211_ATTR_WIPHY_FREQ_OFFSET] = NLA_POLICY_RANGE(NLA_U32, 0, 999),
[NL80211_ATTR_SCAN_FREQ_KHZ] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
- [NL80211_ATTR_HE_6GHZ_CAPABILITY] = {
- .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
- .len = sizeof(struct ieee80211_he_6ghz_capa),
- },
+ [NL80211_ATTR_HE_6GHZ_CAPABILITY] =
+ NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct ieee80211_he_6ghz_capa)),
};
/* policy for the key attributes */
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [RFC 2/4] netlink: consistently use NLA_POLICY_MIN_LEN()
2020-08-05 14:03 [RFC 0/4] netlink: binary attribute range validation Johannes Berg
2020-08-05 14:03 ` [RFC 1/4] netlink: consistently use NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN() Johannes Berg
@ 2020-08-05 14:03 ` Johannes Berg
2020-08-05 14:03 ` [RFC 3/4] netlink: make NLA_BINARY validation more flexible Johannes Berg
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2020-08-05 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless, netdev; +Cc: Johannes Berg
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Change places that open-code NLA_POLICY_MIN_LEN() to
use the macro instead, giving us flexibility in how we
handle the details of the macro.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/macsec.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/wireguard/netlink.c | 4 ++--
net/wireless/nl80211.c | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/macsec.c b/drivers/net/macsec.c
index 9159846b8b93..124045cbcda3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/macsec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/macsec.c
@@ -1611,7 +1611,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy macsec_genl_rxsc_policy[NUM_MACSEC_RXSC_ATTR] = {
static const struct nla_policy macsec_genl_sa_policy[NUM_MACSEC_SA_ATTR] = {
[MACSEC_SA_ATTR_AN] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
[MACSEC_SA_ATTR_ACTIVE] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
- [MACSEC_SA_ATTR_PN] = { .type = NLA_MIN_LEN, .len = 4 },
+ [MACSEC_SA_ATTR_PN] = NLA_POLICY_MIN_LEN(4),
[MACSEC_SA_ATTR_KEYID] = { .type = NLA_BINARY,
.len = MACSEC_KEYID_LEN, },
[MACSEC_SA_ATTR_KEY] = { .type = NLA_BINARY,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireguard/netlink.c b/drivers/net/wireguard/netlink.c
index 0e6c6eb9384e..d0f3b6d7f408 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireguard/netlink.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/netlink.c
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy peer_policy[WGPEER_A_MAX + 1] = {
[WGPEER_A_PUBLIC_KEY] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(NOISE_PUBLIC_KEY_LEN),
[WGPEER_A_PRESHARED_KEY] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(NOISE_SYMMETRIC_KEY_LEN),
[WGPEER_A_FLAGS] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
- [WGPEER_A_ENDPOINT] = { .type = NLA_MIN_LEN, .len = sizeof(struct sockaddr) },
+ [WGPEER_A_ENDPOINT] = NLA_POLICY_MIN_LEN(sizeof(struct sockaddr)),
[WGPEER_A_PERSISTENT_KEEPALIVE_INTERVAL] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
[WGPEER_A_LAST_HANDSHAKE_TIME] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct __kernel_timespec)),
[WGPEER_A_RX_BYTES] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy peer_policy[WGPEER_A_MAX + 1] = {
static const struct nla_policy allowedip_policy[WGALLOWEDIP_A_MAX + 1] = {
[WGALLOWEDIP_A_FAMILY] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
- [WGALLOWEDIP_A_IPADDR] = { .type = NLA_MIN_LEN, .len = sizeof(struct in_addr) },
+ [WGALLOWEDIP_A_IPADDR] = NLA_POLICY_MIN_LEN(sizeof(struct in_addr)),
[WGALLOWEDIP_A_CIDR_MASK] = { .type = NLA_U8 }
};
diff --git a/net/wireless/nl80211.c b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
index 248e845ebd5b..076e3e96c809 100644
--- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c
+++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ nl80211_wowlan_tcp_policy[NUM_NL80211_WOWLAN_TCP] = {
[NL80211_WOWLAN_TCP_DST_MAC] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN_WARN(ETH_ALEN),
[NL80211_WOWLAN_TCP_SRC_PORT] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
[NL80211_WOWLAN_TCP_DST_PORT] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
- [NL80211_WOWLAN_TCP_DATA_PAYLOAD] = { .type = NLA_MIN_LEN, .len = 1 },
+ [NL80211_WOWLAN_TCP_DATA_PAYLOAD] = NLA_POLICY_MIN_LEN(1),
[NL80211_WOWLAN_TCP_DATA_PAYLOAD_SEQ] = {
.len = sizeof(struct nl80211_wowlan_tcp_data_seq)
},
@@ -714,8 +714,8 @@ nl80211_wowlan_tcp_policy[NUM_NL80211_WOWLAN_TCP] = {
.len = sizeof(struct nl80211_wowlan_tcp_data_token)
},
[NL80211_WOWLAN_TCP_DATA_INTERVAL] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
- [NL80211_WOWLAN_TCP_WAKE_PAYLOAD] = { .type = NLA_MIN_LEN, .len = 1 },
- [NL80211_WOWLAN_TCP_WAKE_MASK] = { .type = NLA_MIN_LEN, .len = 1 },
+ [NL80211_WOWLAN_TCP_WAKE_PAYLOAD] = NLA_POLICY_MIN_LEN(1),
+ [NL80211_WOWLAN_TCP_WAKE_MASK] = NLA_POLICY_MIN_LEN(1),
};
#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [RFC 3/4] netlink: make NLA_BINARY validation more flexible
2020-08-05 14:03 [RFC 0/4] netlink: binary attribute range validation Johannes Berg
2020-08-05 14:03 ` [RFC 1/4] netlink: consistently use NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN() Johannes Berg
2020-08-05 14:03 ` [RFC 2/4] netlink: consistently use NLA_POLICY_MIN_LEN() Johannes Berg
@ 2020-08-05 14:03 ` Johannes Berg
2020-08-05 14:03 ` [RFC 4/4] nl80211: use NLA_POLICY_RANGE(NLA_BINARY, ...) for a few attributes Johannes Berg
2020-08-08 21:07 ` [RFC 0/4] netlink: binary attribute range validation David Miller
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2020-08-05 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless, netdev; +Cc: Johannes Berg
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Add range validation for NLA_BINARY, allowing validation of any
combination of combination minimum or maximum lengths, using the
existing NLA_POLICY_RANGE()/NLA_POLICY_FULL_RANGE() macros, just
like for integers where the value is checked.
Also make NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(), NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN_WARN()
and NLA_POLICY_MIN_LEN() special cases of this, removing the old
types NLA_EXACT_LEN and NLA_MIN_LEN.
This allows us to save some code where both minimum and maximum
lengths are requires, currently the policy only allows maximum
(NLA_BINARY), minimum (NLA_MIN_LEN) or exact (NLA_EXACT_LEN), so
a range of lengths cannot be accepted and must be checked by the
code that consumes the attributes later.
Also, this allows advertising the correct ranges in the policy
export to userspace. Here, NLA_MIN_LEN and NLA_EXACT_LEN already
were special cases of NLA_BINARY with min and min/max length
respectively.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
---
include/net/netlink.h | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
lib/nlattr.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
net/netlink/policy.c | 32 ++++++++++++++----------
3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/netlink.h b/include/net/netlink.h
index c0411f14fb53..fdd317f8fde4 100644
--- a/include/net/netlink.h
+++ b/include/net/netlink.h
@@ -181,8 +181,6 @@ enum {
NLA_S64,
NLA_BITFIELD32,
NLA_REJECT,
- NLA_EXACT_LEN,
- NLA_MIN_LEN,
__NLA_TYPE_MAX,
};
@@ -199,11 +197,11 @@ struct netlink_range_validation_signed {
enum nla_policy_validation {
NLA_VALIDATE_NONE,
NLA_VALIDATE_RANGE,
+ NLA_VALIDATE_RANGE_WARN_TOO_LONG,
NLA_VALIDATE_MIN,
NLA_VALIDATE_MAX,
NLA_VALIDATE_RANGE_PTR,
NLA_VALIDATE_FUNCTION,
- NLA_VALIDATE_WARN_TOO_LONG,
};
/**
@@ -222,7 +220,7 @@ enum nla_policy_validation {
* NLA_NUL_STRING Maximum length of string (excluding NUL)
* NLA_FLAG Unused
* NLA_BINARY Maximum length of attribute payload
- * NLA_MIN_LEN Minimum length of attribute payload
+ * (but see also below with the validation type)
* NLA_NESTED,
* NLA_NESTED_ARRAY Length verification is done by checking len of
* nested header (or empty); len field is used if
@@ -237,11 +235,6 @@ enum nla_policy_validation {
* just like "All other"
* NLA_BITFIELD32 Unused
* NLA_REJECT Unused
- * NLA_EXACT_LEN Attribute should have exactly this length, otherwise
- * it is rejected or warned about, the latter happening
- * if and only if the `validation_type' is set to
- * NLA_VALIDATE_WARN_TOO_LONG.
- * NLA_MIN_LEN Minimum length of attribute payload
* All other Minimum length of attribute payload
*
* Meaning of validation union:
@@ -296,6 +289,11 @@ enum nla_policy_validation {
* pointer to a struct netlink_range_validation_signed
* that indicates the min/max values.
* Use NLA_POLICY_FULL_RANGE_SIGNED().
+ *
+ * NLA_BINARY If the validation type is like the ones for integers
+ * above, then the min/max length (not value like for
+ * integers) of the attribute is enforced.
+ *
* All other Unused - but note that it's a union
*
* Meaning of `validate' field, use via NLA_POLICY_VALIDATE_FN:
@@ -309,7 +307,7 @@ enum nla_policy_validation {
* static const struct nla_policy my_policy[ATTR_MAX+1] = {
* [ATTR_FOO] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
* [ATTR_BAR] = { .type = NLA_STRING, .len = BARSIZ },
- * [ATTR_BAZ] = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN, .len = sizeof(struct mystruct) },
+ * [ATTR_BAZ] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct mystruct)),
* [ATTR_GOO] = NLA_POLICY_BITFIELD32(myvalidflags),
* };
*/
@@ -335,9 +333,10 @@ struct nla_policy {
* nesting validation starts here.
*
* Additionally, it means that NLA_UNSPEC is actually NLA_REJECT
- * for any types >= this, so need to use NLA_MIN_LEN to get the
- * previous pure { .len = xyz } behaviour. The advantage of this
- * is that types not specified in the policy will be rejected.
+ * for any types >= this, so need to use NLA_POLICY_MIN_LEN() to
+ * get the previous pure { .len = xyz } behaviour. The advantage
+ * of this is that types not specified in the policy will be
+ * rejected.
*
* For completely new families it should be set to 1 so that the
* validation is enforced for all attributes. For existing ones
@@ -349,12 +348,6 @@ struct nla_policy {
};
};
-#define NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(_len) { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN, .len = _len }
-#define NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN_WARN(_len) \
- { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN, .len = _len, \
- .validation_type = NLA_VALIDATE_WARN_TOO_LONG, }
-#define NLA_POLICY_MIN_LEN(_len) { .type = NLA_MIN_LEN, .len = _len }
-
#define NLA_POLICY_ETH_ADDR NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(ETH_ALEN)
#define NLA_POLICY_ETH_ADDR_COMPAT NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN_WARN(ETH_ALEN)
@@ -370,19 +363,21 @@ struct nla_policy {
{ .type = NLA_BITFIELD32, .bitfield32_valid = valid }
#define __NLA_ENSURE(condition) BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(!(condition))
-#define NLA_ENSURE_UINT_TYPE(tp) \
+#define NLA_ENSURE_UINT_OR_BINARY_TYPE(tp) \
(__NLA_ENSURE(tp == NLA_U8 || tp == NLA_U16 || \
tp == NLA_U32 || tp == NLA_U64 || \
- tp == NLA_MSECS) + tp)
+ tp == NLA_MSECS || \
+ tp == NLA_BINARY) + tp)
#define NLA_ENSURE_SINT_TYPE(tp) \
(__NLA_ENSURE(tp == NLA_S8 || tp == NLA_S16 || \
tp == NLA_S32 || tp == NLA_S64) + tp)
-#define NLA_ENSURE_INT_TYPE(tp) \
+#define NLA_ENSURE_INT_OR_BINARY_TYPE(tp) \
(__NLA_ENSURE(tp == NLA_S8 || tp == NLA_U8 || \
tp == NLA_S16 || tp == NLA_U16 || \
tp == NLA_S32 || tp == NLA_U32 || \
tp == NLA_S64 || tp == NLA_U64 || \
- tp == NLA_MSECS) + tp)
+ tp == NLA_MSECS || \
+ tp == NLA_BINARY) + tp)
#define NLA_ENSURE_NO_VALIDATION_PTR(tp) \
(__NLA_ENSURE(tp != NLA_BITFIELD32 && \
tp != NLA_REJECT && \
@@ -390,14 +385,14 @@ struct nla_policy {
tp != NLA_NESTED_ARRAY) + tp)
#define NLA_POLICY_RANGE(tp, _min, _max) { \
- .type = NLA_ENSURE_INT_TYPE(tp), \
+ .type = NLA_ENSURE_INT_OR_BINARY_TYPE(tp), \
.validation_type = NLA_VALIDATE_RANGE, \
.min = _min, \
.max = _max \
}
#define NLA_POLICY_FULL_RANGE(tp, _range) { \
- .type = NLA_ENSURE_UINT_TYPE(tp), \
+ .type = NLA_ENSURE_UINT_OR_BINARY_TYPE(tp), \
.validation_type = NLA_VALIDATE_RANGE_PTR, \
.range = _range, \
}
@@ -409,13 +404,13 @@ struct nla_policy {
}
#define NLA_POLICY_MIN(tp, _min) { \
- .type = NLA_ENSURE_INT_TYPE(tp), \
+ .type = NLA_ENSURE_INT_OR_BINARY_TYPE(tp), \
.validation_type = NLA_VALIDATE_MIN, \
.min = _min, \
}
#define NLA_POLICY_MAX(tp, _max) { \
- .type = NLA_ENSURE_INT_TYPE(tp), \
+ .type = NLA_ENSURE_INT_OR_BINARY_TYPE(tp), \
.validation_type = NLA_VALIDATE_MAX, \
.max = _max, \
}
@@ -427,6 +422,15 @@ struct nla_policy {
.len = __VA_ARGS__ + 0, \
}
+#define NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(_len) NLA_POLICY_RANGE(NLA_BINARY, _len, _len)
+#define NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN_WARN(_len) { \
+ .type = NLA_BINARY, \
+ .validation_type = NLA_VALIDATE_RANGE_WARN_TOO_LONG, \
+ .min = _len, \
+ .max = _len \
+}
+#define NLA_POLICY_MIN_LEN(_len) NLA_POLICY_MIN(NLA_BINARY, _len)
+
/**
* struct nl_info - netlink source information
* @nlh: Netlink message header of original request
diff --git a/lib/nlattr.c b/lib/nlattr.c
index bc5b5cf608c4..07d48234d7c7 100644
--- a/lib/nlattr.c
+++ b/lib/nlattr.c
@@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ void nla_get_range_unsigned(const struct nla_policy *pt,
range->max = U8_MAX;
break;
case NLA_U16:
+ case NLA_BINARY:
range->max = U16_MAX;
break;
case NLA_U32:
@@ -140,6 +141,7 @@ void nla_get_range_unsigned(const struct nla_policy *pt,
switch (pt->validation_type) {
case NLA_VALIDATE_RANGE:
+ case NLA_VALIDATE_RANGE_WARN_TOO_LONG:
range->min = pt->min;
range->max = pt->max;
break;
@@ -157,9 +159,10 @@ void nla_get_range_unsigned(const struct nla_policy *pt,
}
}
-static int nla_validate_int_range_unsigned(const struct nla_policy *pt,
- const struct nlattr *nla,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+static int nla_validate_range_unsigned(const struct nla_policy *pt,
+ const struct nlattr *nla,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
+ unsigned int validate)
{
struct netlink_range_validation range;
u64 value;
@@ -178,15 +181,36 @@ static int nla_validate_int_range_unsigned(const struct nla_policy *pt,
case NLA_MSECS:
value = nla_get_u64(nla);
break;
+ case NLA_BINARY:
+ value = nla_len(nla);
+ break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
nla_get_range_unsigned(pt, &range);
+ if (pt->validation_type == NLA_VALIDATE_RANGE_WARN_TOO_LONG &&
+ pt->type == NLA_BINARY && value > range.max) {
+ pr_warn_ratelimited("netlink: '%s': attribute type %d has an invalid length.\n",
+ current->comm, pt->type);
+ if (validate & NL_VALIDATE_STRICT_ATTRS) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, nla,
+ "invalid attribute length");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
+
if (value < range.min || value > range.max) {
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, nla,
- "integer out of range");
+ bool binary = pt->type == NLA_BINARY;
+
+ if (binary)
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, nla,
+ "binary attribute size out of range");
+ else
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, nla,
+ "integer out of range");
+
return -ERANGE;
}
@@ -274,7 +298,8 @@ static int nla_validate_int_range_signed(const struct nla_policy *pt,
static int nla_validate_int_range(const struct nla_policy *pt,
const struct nlattr *nla,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
+ unsigned int validate)
{
switch (pt->type) {
case NLA_U8:
@@ -282,7 +307,8 @@ static int nla_validate_int_range(const struct nla_policy *pt,
case NLA_U32:
case NLA_U64:
case NLA_MSECS:
- return nla_validate_int_range_unsigned(pt, nla, extack);
+ case NLA_BINARY:
+ return nla_validate_range_unsigned(pt, nla, extack, validate);
case NLA_S8:
case NLA_S16:
case NLA_S32:
@@ -313,10 +339,7 @@ static int validate_nla(const struct nlattr *nla, int maxtype,
BUG_ON(pt->type > NLA_TYPE_MAX);
- if ((nla_attr_len[pt->type] && attrlen != nla_attr_len[pt->type]) ||
- (pt->type == NLA_EXACT_LEN &&
- pt->validation_type == NLA_VALIDATE_WARN_TOO_LONG &&
- attrlen != pt->len)) {
+ if (nla_attr_len[pt->type] && attrlen != nla_attr_len[pt->type]) {
pr_warn_ratelimited("netlink: '%s': attribute type %d has an invalid length.\n",
current->comm, type);
if (validate & NL_VALIDATE_STRICT_ATTRS) {
@@ -449,19 +472,10 @@ static int validate_nla(const struct nlattr *nla, int maxtype,
"Unsupported attribute");
return -EINVAL;
}
- /* fall through */
- case NLA_MIN_LEN:
if (attrlen < pt->len)
goto out_err;
break;
- case NLA_EXACT_LEN:
- if (pt->validation_type != NLA_VALIDATE_WARN_TOO_LONG) {
- if (attrlen != pt->len)
- goto out_err;
- break;
- }
- /* fall through */
default:
if (pt->len)
minlen = pt->len;
@@ -479,9 +493,10 @@ static int validate_nla(const struct nlattr *nla, int maxtype,
break;
case NLA_VALIDATE_RANGE_PTR:
case NLA_VALIDATE_RANGE:
+ case NLA_VALIDATE_RANGE_WARN_TOO_LONG:
case NLA_VALIDATE_MIN:
case NLA_VALIDATE_MAX:
- err = nla_validate_int_range(pt, nla, extack);
+ err = nla_validate_int_range(pt, nla, extack, validate);
if (err)
return err;
break;
diff --git a/net/netlink/policy.c b/net/netlink/policy.c
index f6491853c797..46c11c9c212a 100644
--- a/net/netlink/policy.c
+++ b/net/netlink/policy.c
@@ -251,12 +251,6 @@ int netlink_policy_dump_write(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned long _state)
pt->bitfield32_valid))
goto nla_put_failure;
break;
- case NLA_EXACT_LEN:
- type = NL_ATTR_TYPE_BINARY;
- if (nla_put_u32(skb, NL_POLICY_TYPE_ATTR_MIN_LENGTH, pt->len) ||
- nla_put_u32(skb, NL_POLICY_TYPE_ATTR_MAX_LENGTH, pt->len))
- goto nla_put_failure;
- break;
case NLA_STRING:
case NLA_NUL_STRING:
case NLA_BINARY:
@@ -266,14 +260,26 @@ int netlink_policy_dump_write(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned long _state)
type = NL_ATTR_TYPE_NUL_STRING;
else
type = NL_ATTR_TYPE_BINARY;
- if (pt->len && nla_put_u32(skb, NL_POLICY_TYPE_ATTR_MAX_LENGTH,
- pt->len))
- goto nla_put_failure;
- break;
- case NLA_MIN_LEN:
- type = NL_ATTR_TYPE_BINARY;
- if (nla_put_u32(skb, NL_POLICY_TYPE_ATTR_MIN_LENGTH, pt->len))
+
+ if (pt->validation_type != NLA_VALIDATE_NONE) {
+ struct netlink_range_validation range;
+
+ nla_get_range_unsigned(pt, &range);
+
+ if (range.min &&
+ nla_put_u32(skb, NL_POLICY_TYPE_ATTR_MIN_LENGTH,
+ range.min))
+ goto nla_put_failure;
+
+ if (range.max < U16_MAX &&
+ nla_put_u32(skb, NL_POLICY_TYPE_ATTR_MAX_LENGTH,
+ range.max))
+ goto nla_put_failure;
+ } else if (pt->len &&
+ nla_put_u32(skb, NL_POLICY_TYPE_ATTR_MAX_LENGTH,
+ pt->len)) {
goto nla_put_failure;
+ }
break;
case NLA_FLAG:
type = NL_ATTR_TYPE_FLAG;
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [RFC 4/4] nl80211: use NLA_POLICY_RANGE(NLA_BINARY, ...) for a few attributes
2020-08-05 14:03 [RFC 0/4] netlink: binary attribute range validation Johannes Berg
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-08-05 14:03 ` [RFC 3/4] netlink: make NLA_BINARY validation more flexible Johannes Berg
@ 2020-08-05 14:03 ` Johannes Berg
2020-08-08 21:07 ` [RFC 0/4] netlink: binary attribute range validation David Miller
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2020-08-05 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless, netdev; +Cc: Johannes Berg
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We have a few attributes with minimum and maximum lengths that are
not the same, use the new feature of being able to specify both in
the policy to validate them, removing code and allowing this to be
advertised to userspace in the policy export.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
---
net/wireless/nl80211.c | 36 ++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/wireless/nl80211.c b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
index 076e3e96c809..e91d5bcb0f8b 100644
--- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c
+++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
@@ -574,14 +574,20 @@ static const struct nla_policy nl80211_policy[NUM_NL80211_ATTR] = {
[NL80211_ATTR_CSA_C_OFF_BEACON] = { .type = NLA_BINARY },
[NL80211_ATTR_CSA_C_OFF_PRESP] = { .type = NLA_BINARY },
[NL80211_ATTR_STA_SUPPORTED_CHANNELS] = NLA_POLICY_MIN_LEN(2),
- [NL80211_ATTR_STA_SUPPORTED_OPER_CLASSES] = { .type = NLA_BINARY },
+ /*
+ * The value of the Length field of the Supported Operating
+ * Classes element is between 2 and 253.
+ */
+ [NL80211_ATTR_STA_SUPPORTED_OPER_CLASSES] =
+ NLA_POLICY_RANGE(NLA_BINARY, 2, 253),
[NL80211_ATTR_HANDLE_DFS] = { .type = NLA_FLAG },
[NL80211_ATTR_OPMODE_NOTIF] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
[NL80211_ATTR_VENDOR_ID] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
[NL80211_ATTR_VENDOR_SUBCMD] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
[NL80211_ATTR_VENDOR_DATA] = { .type = NLA_BINARY },
- [NL80211_ATTR_QOS_MAP] = { .type = NLA_BINARY,
- .len = IEEE80211_QOS_MAP_LEN_MAX },
+ [NL80211_ATTR_QOS_MAP] = NLA_POLICY_RANGE(NLA_BINARY,
+ IEEE80211_QOS_MAP_LEN_MIN,
+ IEEE80211_QOS_MAP_LEN_MAX),
[NL80211_ATTR_MAC_HINT] = NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN_WARN(ETH_ALEN),
[NL80211_ATTR_WIPHY_FREQ_HINT] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
[NL80211_ATTR_TDLS_PEER_CAPABILITY] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
@@ -636,9 +642,10 @@ static const struct nla_policy nl80211_policy[NUM_NL80211_ATTR] = {
[NL80211_ATTR_TXQ_LIMIT] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
[NL80211_ATTR_TXQ_MEMORY_LIMIT] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
[NL80211_ATTR_TXQ_QUANTUM] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
- [NL80211_ATTR_HE_CAPABILITY] = { .type = NLA_BINARY,
- .len = NL80211_HE_MAX_CAPABILITY_LEN },
-
+ [NL80211_ATTR_HE_CAPABILITY] =
+ NLA_POLICY_RANGE(NLA_BINARY,
+ NL80211_HE_MIN_CAPABILITY_LEN,
+ NL80211_HE_MAX_CAPABILITY_LEN),
[NL80211_ATTR_FTM_RESPONDER] =
NLA_POLICY_NESTED(nl80211_ftm_responder_policy),
[NL80211_ATTR_TIMEOUT] = NLA_POLICY_MIN(NLA_U32, 1),
@@ -5851,13 +5858,6 @@ static int nl80211_parse_sta_channel_info(struct genl_info *info,
nla_data(info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_STA_SUPPORTED_OPER_CLASSES]);
params->supported_oper_classes_len =
nla_len(info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_STA_SUPPORTED_OPER_CLASSES]);
- /*
- * The value of the Length field of the Supported Operating
- * Classes element is between 2 and 253.
- */
- if (params->supported_oper_classes_len < 2 ||
- params->supported_oper_classes_len > 253)
- return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
@@ -5880,9 +5880,6 @@ static int nl80211_set_station_tdls(struct genl_info *info,
nla_data(info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_HE_CAPABILITY]);
params->he_capa_len =
nla_len(info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_HE_CAPABILITY]);
-
- if (params->he_capa_len < NL80211_HE_MIN_CAPABILITY_LEN)
- return -EINVAL;
}
err = nl80211_parse_sta_channel_info(info, params);
@@ -6141,10 +6138,6 @@ static int nl80211_new_station(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
nla_data(info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_HE_CAPABILITY]);
params.he_capa_len =
nla_len(info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_HE_CAPABILITY]);
-
- /* max len is validated in nla policy */
- if (params.he_capa_len < NL80211_HE_MIN_CAPABILITY_LEN)
- return -EINVAL;
}
if (info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_HE_6GHZ_CAPABILITY])
@@ -13540,8 +13533,7 @@ static int nl80211_set_qos_map(struct sk_buff *skb,
pos = nla_data(info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_QOS_MAP]);
len = nla_len(info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_QOS_MAP]);
- if (len % 2 || len < IEEE80211_QOS_MAP_LEN_MIN ||
- len > IEEE80211_QOS_MAP_LEN_MAX)
+ if (len % 2)
return -EINVAL;
qos_map = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cfg80211_qos_map), GFP_KERNEL);
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC 0/4] netlink: binary attribute range validation
2020-08-05 14:03 [RFC 0/4] netlink: binary attribute range validation Johannes Berg
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-08-05 14:03 ` [RFC 4/4] nl80211: use NLA_POLICY_RANGE(NLA_BINARY, ...) for a few attributes Johannes Berg
@ 2020-08-08 21:07 ` David Miller
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2020-08-08 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: johannes; +Cc: linux-wireless, netdev
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:03:20 +0200
> This is something I'd been thinking about for a while; we already
> have NLA_MIN_LEN, NLA_BINARY (with a max len), and NLA_EXACT_LEN,
> but in quite a few places (as you can see in the last patch here)
> we need a range, and we already have a way to encode ranges for
> integer ranges, so it's pretty easy to use that for binary length
> ranges as well.
>
> So at least for wireless this seems useful to save some code, and
> to (mostly) expose the actual limits to userspace via the policy
> export that we have now.
>
> What do you think?
This looks great to me.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread