Netdev Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] netlink: allow NLA_BINARY length range validation
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:29:11 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

From: Johannes Berg <>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 10:17:30 +0200

> In quite a few places (perhaps particularly in wireless) we need to
> validation an NLA_BINARY attribute with both a minimum and a maximum
> length. Currently, we can do either of the two, but not both, given
> that we have NLA_MIN_LEN (minimum length) and NLA_BINARY (maximum).
> Extend the range mechanisms that we use for integer validation to
> apply to NLA_BINARY as well.

Series applied, thanks Johannes.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-18 19:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-18  8:17 Johannes Berg
2020-08-18  8:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] netlink: consistently use NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN() Johannes Berg
2020-08-18  8:53   ` Matthieu Baerts
2020-08-18  8:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] netlink: consistently use NLA_POLICY_MIN_LEN() Johannes Berg
2020-08-18  8:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] netlink: make NLA_BINARY validation more flexible Johannes Berg
2020-08-18 19:29 ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] netlink: allow NLA_BINARY length range validation' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).