Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Cc: "Li RongQing" <lirongqing@baidu.com>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
	"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@intel.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	Piotr <piotr.raczynski@intel.com>,
	Maciej <maciej.machnikowski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 0/2] intel/xdp fixes for fliping rx buffer
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 18:51:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200820165121.GA9731@ranger.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+HfNjybUeN9v6N-pnupi32088PL+ZXu8CKWGWmowOaH4nmOw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 05:13:16PM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 16:04, Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 08:24, Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > This fixes ice/i40e/ixgbe/ixgbevf_rx_buffer_flip in
> > > copy mode xdp that can lead to data corruption.
> > >
> > > I split two patches, since i40e/xgbe/ixgbevf supports xsk
> > > receiving from 4.18, put their fixes in a patch
> > >
> >
> > Li, sorry for the looong latency. I took a looong vacation. :-P
> >
> > Thanks for taking a look at this, but I believe this is not a bug.
> >
> 
> Ok, dug a bit more into this. I had an offlist discussion with Li, and
> there are two places (AFAIK) where Li experience a BUG() in
> tcp_collapse():
> 
>             BUG_ON(offset < 0);
> and
>                 if (skb_copy_bits(skb, offset, skb_put(nskb, size), size))
>                     BUG();
> 
> (Li, please correct me if I'm wrong.)
> 
> I still claim that the page-flipping mechanism is correct, but I found
> some weirdness in the build_skb() call.
> 
> In drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c, build_skb() is invoked as:
>     skb = build_skb(xdp->data_hard_start, truesize);
> 
> For the setup Li has truesize is 2048 (half a page), but the
> rx_buf_len is 1536. In the driver a packet is layed out as:
> 
> | padding 192 | packet data 1536 | skb shared info 320 |
> 
> build_skb() assumes that the second argument (frag_size) is max packet
> size + SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)). In other words,
> frag_size should not include the padding (192 above). In build_skb(),

Not sure I am buying that reasoning. It assumes the padding + packet_data
and we use skb_reserve() to tell the skb about the padding.

__build_skb_around() subtracts sizeof(struct skb_shared_info) from size
that we are providing, so now we are with padding + packet_data.
Then it is used to calculate the skb->end.

Back to i40e_build_skb(), we use the skb_reserve() to advance the
skb->data and skb->tail so that they point to packet_data. Finally
__skb_put() will move the skb->tail to the end of packet_data.

Wouldn't your approach disallow having the headroom at all in the linear
part of skb?

> frag_size is used to compute the skb truesize and skb end. i40e passes

IMHO skb->end is correct. For skb->truesize I would assume that the
headroom should also be taken into account for tracking how many bytes a
particular skb consumes, no?

> a too large buffer, and can therefore potentially corrupt the skb, and
> maybe this is the reason for tcp_collapse() splatting.
> 
> Li, could you test if you get the splat with this patch:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> index 3e5c566ceb01..acfb4ad9b506 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> @@ -2065,7 +2065,8 @@ static struct sk_buff *i40e_build_skb(struct
> i40e_ring *rx_ring,
>  {
>      unsigned int metasize = xdp->data - xdp->data_meta;
>  #if (PAGE_SIZE < 8192)
> -    unsigned int truesize = i40e_rx_pg_size(rx_ring) / 2;
> +    unsigned int truesize = rx_ring->rx_buf_len +
> +                SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));

This will actually break the page flipping scheme. We need a separate
variable for that and use the old truesize to bump the page_offset.

>  #else
>      unsigned int truesize = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)) +
>                  SKB_DATA_ALIGN(xdp->data_end -
> 
> I'll have a look in the other Intel drivers, and see if there are
> similar issues. I'll cook a patch.
> 
> 
> Björn

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-20 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-17  6:24 Li RongQing
2020-07-17  6:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] xdp: i40e: ixgbe: ixgbevf: not flip rx buffer for copy mode xdp Li RongQing
2020-07-20  7:21   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Magnus Karlsson
2020-07-21  1:42     ` 答复: " Li,Rongqing
2020-07-21  7:49     ` Li,Rongqing
2020-07-17  6:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] ice/xdp: not adjust " Li RongQing
2020-08-18 14:04 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 0/2] intel/xdp fixes for fliping rx buffer Björn Töpel
2020-08-19  1:37   ` 答复: " Li,Rongqing
2020-08-19  6:44     ` Björn Töpel
2020-08-19  8:17       ` 答复: " Li,Rongqing
2020-08-19  8:31         ` Björn Töpel
2020-08-19  8:52           ` Björn Töpel
2020-08-20 15:13   ` Björn Töpel
2020-08-20 16:51     ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2020-08-20 18:04       ` Björn Töpel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200820165121.GA9731@ranger.igk.intel.com \
    --to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@gmail.com \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
    --cc=maciej.machnikowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=piotr.raczynski@intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 0/2] intel/xdp fixes for fliping rx buffer' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).