Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
Cc: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"roid@mellanox.com" <roid@mellanox.com>,
	"saeedm@mellanox.com" <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] devlink: Consider other controller while building phys_port_name
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:32:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200827113216.7b9a3a25@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR12MB432276DBB3345AD328D787E4DC550@BY5PR12MB4322.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 04:31:43 +0000 Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > $ devlink port show looks like below without a controller annotation.
> > > pci/0000:00:08.0/0: type eth netdev eth5 flavour physical
> > > pci/0000:00:08.0/1: type eth netdev eth6 flavour pcipf pfnum 0
> > > pci/0000:00:08.0/2: type eth netdev eth7 flavour pcipf pfnum 0  
> > 
> > How can you have two PF 0? Aaah - by controller you mean hardware IP, not
> > whoever is controlling the switching! So the chip has multiple HW controllers,
> > each of which can have multiple PFs?
> >   
> Hardware IP is one. This IP is plugged into two PCI root complexes.
> One is eswitch PF, this PF has its own VFs/SFs.
> Other PF(s) plugged into an second PCI Root complex serving the server system.
> So you are right there are multiple PFs.

I find it strange that you have pfnum 0 everywhere but then different
controllers. For MultiHost at Netronome we've used pfnum to distinguish
between the hosts. ASIC must have some unique identifiers for each PF.

I'm not aware of any practical reason for creating PFs on one RC
without reinitializing all the others.

I can see how having multiple controllers may make things clearer, but
adding another layer of IDs while the one under it is unused (pfnum=0)
feels very unnecessary.

> Both the PFs have same PCI BDF.

BDFs are irrelevant.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-27 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-25 13:58 [PATCH net-next 0/3] devlink show controller info Parav Pandit
2020-08-25 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] devlink: Add comment block for missing port attributes Parav Pandit
2020-08-25 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] devlink: Consider other controller while building phys_port_name Parav Pandit
2020-08-26  0:32   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-08-26  4:27     ` Parav Pandit
2020-08-26 20:07       ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-08-27  4:31         ` Parav Pandit
2020-08-27 18:32           ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2020-08-27 20:15             ` Parav Pandit
2020-08-27 21:42               ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-08-28  4:27                 ` Parav Pandit
2020-08-28  5:08                   ` Parav Pandit
2020-08-28 16:43                   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-08-29  3:43                     ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-01  8:19                       ` Jiri Pirko
2020-09-01  8:53                         ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-01  9:17                           ` Jiri Pirko
2020-09-01 21:28                             ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-02  4:26                               ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-02  4:44                                 ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-02  8:00                                 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-09-02 15:23                                   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-02 16:18                                     ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-02 20:10                                       ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-03  5:54                                     ` Jiri Pirko
2020-09-03 19:31                                       ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-04  8:43                                         ` Jiri Pirko
2020-09-06  3:08                                           ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-06 16:46                                             ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-07  7:21                                             ` Jiri Pirko
2020-09-07 16:18                                               ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-08-25 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] net/mlx5: E-switch, Set controller attribute for PCI PF and VF ports Parav Pandit
2020-09-08 14:42 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] devlink show controller number Parav Pandit
2020-09-08 14:42   ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] net/mlx5: E-switch, Read controller number from device Parav Pandit
2020-09-08 14:42   ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] devlink: Add comment block for missing port attributes Parav Pandit
2020-09-08 14:42   ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] devlink: Move structure comments outside of structure Parav Pandit
2020-09-08 14:42   ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] devlink: Introduce external controller flag Parav Pandit
2020-09-08 14:42   ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] devlink: Introduce controller number Parav Pandit
2020-09-08 18:50     ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-09  3:06       ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-08 14:42   ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] devlink: Use controller while building phys_port_name Parav Pandit
2020-09-09  4:50 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/6] devlink show controller number Parav Pandit
2020-09-09  4:50   ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] net/mlx5: E-switch, Read controller number from device Parav Pandit
2020-09-09  4:50   ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/6] devlink: Add comment block for missing port attributes Parav Pandit
2020-09-09  4:50   ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/6] devlink: Move structure comments outside of structure Parav Pandit
2020-09-09  4:50   ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/6] devlink: Introduce external controller flag Parav Pandit
2020-09-09  4:50   ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/6] devlink: Introduce controller number Parav Pandit
2020-09-09  4:50   ` [PATCH net-next v3 6/6] devlink: Use controller while building phys_port_name Parav Pandit
2020-09-10 15:02     ` David Ahern
2020-09-09 15:34   ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/6] devlink show controller number Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-09 21:20     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200827113216.7b9a3a25@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=parav@mellanox.com \
    --cc=parav@nvidia.com \
    --cc=roid@mellanox.com \
    --cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).