Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
	Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/6] net: extract napi poll functionality to __napi_poll()
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:24:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200914172453.1833883-4-weiwan@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200914172453.1833883-1-weiwan@google.com>

From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name> 

This commit introduces a new function __napi_poll() which does the main
logic of the existing napi_poll() function, and will be called by other
functions in later commits.
This idea and implementation is done by Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name> and
is proposed as part of the patch to move napi work to work_queue
context.
This commit by itself is a code restructure.

Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
---
 net/core/dev.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 0fe4c531b682..bc2a7681b239 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6719,15 +6719,10 @@ void __netif_napi_del(struct napi_struct *napi)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__netif_napi_del);
 
-static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
+static int __napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, bool *repoll)
 {
-	void *have;
 	int work, weight;
 
-	list_del_init(&n->poll_list);
-
-	have = netpoll_poll_lock(n);
-
 	weight = n->weight;
 
 	/* This NAPI_STATE_SCHED test is for avoiding a race
@@ -6747,7 +6742,7 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
 			    n->poll, work, weight);
 
 	if (likely(work < weight))
-		goto out_unlock;
+		return work;
 
 	/* Drivers must not modify the NAPI state if they
 	 * consume the entire weight.  In such cases this code
@@ -6756,7 +6751,7 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(napi_disable_pending(n))) {
 		napi_complete(n);
-		goto out_unlock;
+		return work;
 	}
 
 	if (n->gro_bitmask) {
@@ -6768,6 +6763,26 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
 
 	gro_normal_list(n);
 
+	*repoll = true;
+
+	return work;
+}
+
+static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
+{
+	bool do_repoll = false;
+	void *have;
+	int work;
+
+	list_del_init(&n->poll_list);
+
+	have = netpoll_poll_lock(n);
+
+	work = __napi_poll(n, &do_repoll);
+
+	if (!do_repoll)
+		goto out_unlock;
+
 	/* Some drivers may have called napi_schedule
 	 * prior to exhausting their budget.
 	 */
-- 
2.28.0.618.gf4bc123cb7-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-14 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-14 17:24 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] implement kthread based napi poll Wei Wang
2020-09-14 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/6] net: implement threaded-able napi poll loop support Wei Wang
2020-09-25 19:45   ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2020-09-25 23:50     ` Wei Wang
2020-09-26 14:22       ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2020-09-28  8:45         ` Paolo Abeni
2020-09-28 18:13           ` Wei Wang
2020-09-14 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] net: add sysfs attribute to control napi threaded mode Wei Wang
2020-09-14 17:24 ` Wei Wang [this message]
2020-09-14 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/6] net: modify kthread handler to use __napi_poll() Wei Wang
2020-09-14 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 5/6] net: process RPS/RFS work in kthread context Wei Wang
2020-09-18 22:44   ` Wei Wang
2020-09-21  8:11     ` Eric Dumazet
2020-09-14 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 6/6] net: improve napi threaded config Wei Wang
2020-09-25 13:48 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] implement kthread based napi poll Magnus Karlsson
2020-09-25 17:15   ` Wei Wang
2020-09-25 17:30     ` Eric Dumazet
2020-09-25 18:16     ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-09-25 18:23       ` Eric Dumazet
2020-09-25 19:00         ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-09-25 19:06   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-28 14:07     ` Magnus Karlsson
2020-09-28 17:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-09-28 18:15   ` Wei Wang
2020-09-29 19:19   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-29 20:16     ` Wei Wang
2020-09-29 21:48       ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-30  8:23         ` David Laight
2020-09-30  8:58         ` Paolo Abeni
2020-09-30 15:58           ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200914172453.1833883-4-weiwan@google.com \
    --to=weiwan@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --subject='Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/6] net: extract napi poll functionality to __napi_poll()' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).