Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>,
	Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>,
	Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 23/24] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: map virtual bridges with forwarding offload in the PVT
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 18:21:41 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210712152142.800651-24-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210712152142.800651-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

The mv88e6xxx switches have the ability to receive FORWARD (data plane)
frames from the CPU port and route them according to the FDB. We can use
this to offload the forwarding process of packets sent by the software
bridge.

Because DSA supports bridge domain isolation between user ports, just
sending FORWARD frames is not enough, as they might leak the intended
broadcast domain of the bridge on behalf of which the packets are sent.

It should be noted that FORWARD frames are also (and typically) used to
forward data plane packets on DSA links in cross-chip topologies. The
FORWARD frame header contains the source port and switch ID, and
switches receiving this frame header forward the packet according to
their cross-chip port-based VLAN table (PVT).

To address the bridging domain isolation in the context of offloading
the forwarding on TX, the idea is that we can reuse the parts of the PVT
that don't have any physical switch mapped to them, one entry for each
software bridge. The switches will therefore think that behind their
upstream port lie many switches, all in fact backed up by software
bridges through tag_dsa.c, which constructs FORWARD packets with the
right switch ID corresponding to each bridge.

The mapping we use is absolutely trivial: DSA gives us a unique bridge
number, and we add the number of the physical switches in the DSA switch
tree to that, to obtain a unique virtual bridge device number to use in
the PVT.

Co-developed-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
index beb41572d04e..061271480e8a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
@@ -1221,14 +1221,36 @@ static u16 mv88e6xxx_port_vlan(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int dev, int port)
 	bool found = false;
 	u16 pvlan;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) {
-		if (dp->ds->index == dev && dp->index == port) {
+	/* dev is a physical switch */
+	if (dev <= dst->last_switch) {
+		list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) {
+			if (dp->ds->index == dev && dp->index == port) {
+				/* dp might be a DSA link or a user port, so it
+				 * might or might not have a bridge_dev
+				 * pointer. Use the "found" variable for both
+				 * cases.
+				 */
+				br = dp->bridge_dev;
+				found = true;
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+	/* dev is a virtual bridge */
+	} else {
+		list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) {
+			if (dp->bridge_num < 0)
+				continue;
+
+			if (dp->bridge_num + 1 + dst->last_switch != dev)
+				continue;
+
+			br = dp->bridge_dev;
 			found = true;
 			break;
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* Prevent frames from unknown switch or port */
+	/* Prevent frames from unknown switch or virtual bridge */
 	if (!found)
 		return 0;
 
@@ -1236,7 +1258,6 @@ static u16 mv88e6xxx_port_vlan(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int dev, int port)
 	if (dp->type == DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU || dp->type == DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA)
 		return mv88e6xxx_port_mask(chip);
 
-	br = dp->bridge_dev;
 	pvlan = 0;
 
 	/* Frames from user ports can egress any local DSA links and CPU ports,
@@ -2422,6 +2443,44 @@ static void mv88e6xxx_crosschip_bridge_leave(struct dsa_switch *ds,
 	mv88e6xxx_reg_unlock(chip);
 }
 
+/* Treat the software bridge as a virtual single-port switch behind the
+ * CPU and map in the PVT. First dst->last_switch elements are taken by
+ * physical switches, so start from beyond that range.
+ */
+static int mv88e6xxx_map_virtual_bridge_to_pvt(struct dsa_switch *ds,
+					       int bridge_num)
+{
+	u8 dev = bridge_num + ds->dst->last_switch + 1;
+	struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip = ds->priv;
+	int err;
+
+	mv88e6xxx_reg_lock(chip);
+	err = mv88e6xxx_pvt_map(chip, dev, 0);
+	mv88e6xxx_reg_unlock(chip);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int mv88e6xxx_bridge_fwd_offload_add(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
+					    struct net_device *br,
+					    int bridge_num)
+{
+	return mv88e6xxx_map_virtual_bridge_to_pvt(ds, bridge_num);
+}
+
+static void mv88e6xxx_bridge_fwd_offload_del(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
+					     struct net_device *br,
+					     int bridge_num)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	err = mv88e6xxx_map_virtual_bridge_to_pvt(ds, bridge_num);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_err(ds->dev, "failed to remap cross-chip Port VLAN: %pe\n",
+			ERR_PTR(err));
+	}
+}
+
 static int mv88e6xxx_software_reset(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
 {
 	if (chip->info->ops->reset)
@@ -3025,6 +3084,15 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
 	chip->ds = ds;
 	ds->slave_mii_bus = mv88e6xxx_default_mdio_bus(chip);
 
+	/* Since virtual bridges are mapped in the PVT, the number we support
+	 * depends on the physical switch topology. We need to let DSA figure
+	 * that out and therefore we cannot set this at dsa_register_switch()
+	 * time.
+	 */
+	if (mv88e6xxx_has_pvt(chip))
+		ds->num_fwd_offloading_bridges = MV88E6XXX_MAX_PVT_SWITCHES -
+						 ds->dst->last_switch - 1;
+
 	mv88e6xxx_reg_lock(chip);
 
 	if (chip->info->ops->setup_errata) {
@@ -6128,6 +6196,8 @@ static const struct dsa_switch_ops mv88e6xxx_switch_ops = {
 	.crosschip_lag_change	= mv88e6xxx_crosschip_lag_change,
 	.crosschip_lag_join	= mv88e6xxx_crosschip_lag_join,
 	.crosschip_lag_leave	= mv88e6xxx_crosschip_lag_leave,
+	.port_bridge_fwd_offload_add = mv88e6xxx_bridge_fwd_offload_add,
+	.port_bridge_fwd_offload_del = mv88e6xxx_bridge_fwd_offload_del,
 };
 
 static int mv88e6xxx_register_switch(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-12 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-12 15:21 [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 00/24] Allow forwarding for the software bridge data path to be offloaded to capable devices Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 01/24] net: dpaa2-switch: use extack in dpaa2_switch_port_bridge_join Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-13  2:20   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 02/24] net: dpaa2-switch: refactor prechangeupper sanity checks Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-13  2:21   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 03/24] net: mlxsw: " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-13  2:21   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 04/24] net: ocelot: fix switchdev objects synced for wrong netdev with LAG offload Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 05/24] net: prestera: if the LAG that we're joining is under a bridge, join it Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 06/24] net: prestera: refactor prechangeupper sanity checks Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 07/24] net: bridge: disambiguate offload_fwd_mark Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 08/24] net: bridge: switchdev: recycle unused hwdoms Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 09/24] net: bridge: switchdev: let drivers inform which bridge ports are offloaded Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 10/24] net: prestera: guard against multiple switchdev obj replays on same bridge port Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 11/24] net: mlxsw: " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 12/24] net: bridge: drop context pointer from br_fdb_replay Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 13/24] net: bridge: use the public notifier chain for br_fdb_replay Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 14/24] net: bridge: unexport call_switchdev_blocking_notifiers Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 15/24] net: bridge: propagate ctx to switchdev_port_obj_{add,del} Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 16/24] net: bridge: propagate ctx to br_switchdev_port_vlan_{add,del} Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 17/24] net: bridge: replay mdb entries on the public switchdev notifier chain Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 18/24] net: bridge: replay vlan entries on the public switchdev notifier Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 19/24] net: bridge: switchdev object replay helpers for everybody Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 20/24] net: bridge: switchdev: allow the TX data plane forwarding to be offloaded Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 21/24] net: dsa: track the number of switches in a tree Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 22/24] net: dsa: add support for bridge TX forwarding offload Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-15 14:49   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 24/24] net: dsa: tag_dsa: offload the bridge forwarding process Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 00/24] Allow forwarding for the software bridge data path to be offloaded to capable devices Marek Behun
2021-07-12 17:01   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 17:27     ` Marek Behun
2021-07-22  9:50       ` Vladimir Oltean

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210712152142.800651-24-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=tobias@waldekranz.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 23/24] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: map virtual bridges with forwarding offload in the PVT' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).