Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>, Mark Greer <mgreer@animalcreek.com>, Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, linux-nfc@lists.01.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 03/12] nfc: port100: constify several pointers Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:40:13 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210729104022.47761-4-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210729104022.47761-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> Several functions do not modify pointed data so arguments and local variables can be const for correctness and safety. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> --- drivers/nfc/port100.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/nfc/port100.c b/drivers/nfc/port100.c index ccb5c5fab905..517376c43b86 100644 --- a/drivers/nfc/port100.c +++ b/drivers/nfc/port100.c @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static inline u8 port100_checksum(u16 value) } /* The rule: sum(data elements) + checksum = 0 */ -static u8 port100_data_checksum(u8 *data, int datalen) +static u8 port100_data_checksum(const u8 *data, int datalen) { u8 sum = 0; int i; @@ -568,10 +568,10 @@ static void port100_tx_update_payload_len(void *_frame, int len) le16_add_cpu(&frame->datalen, len); } -static bool port100_rx_frame_is_valid(void *_frame) +static bool port100_rx_frame_is_valid(const void *_frame) { u8 checksum; - struct port100_frame *frame = _frame; + const struct port100_frame *frame = _frame; if (frame->start_frame != cpu_to_be16(PORT100_FRAME_SOF) || frame->extended_frame != cpu_to_be16(PORT100_FRAME_EXT)) @@ -589,23 +589,24 @@ static bool port100_rx_frame_is_valid(void *_frame) return true; } -static bool port100_rx_frame_is_ack(struct port100_ack_frame *frame) +static bool port100_rx_frame_is_ack(const struct port100_ack_frame *frame) { return (frame->start_frame == cpu_to_be16(PORT100_FRAME_SOF) && frame->ack_frame == cpu_to_be16(PORT100_FRAME_ACK)); } -static inline int port100_rx_frame_size(void *frame) +static inline int port100_rx_frame_size(const void *frame) { - struct port100_frame *f = frame; + const struct port100_frame *f = frame; return sizeof(struct port100_frame) + le16_to_cpu(f->datalen) + PORT100_FRAME_TAIL_LEN; } -static bool port100_rx_frame_is_cmd_response(struct port100 *dev, void *frame) +static bool port100_rx_frame_is_cmd_response(const struct port100 *dev, + const void *frame) { - struct port100_frame *f = frame; + const struct port100_frame *f = frame; return (PORT100_FRAME_CMD(f) == PORT100_CMD_RESPONSE(dev->cmd->code)); } @@ -655,7 +656,8 @@ static void port100_recv_response(struct urb *urb) schedule_work(&dev->cmd_complete_work); } -static int port100_submit_urb_for_response(struct port100 *dev, gfp_t flags) +static int port100_submit_urb_for_response(const struct port100 *dev, + gfp_t flags) { dev->in_urb->complete = port100_recv_response; @@ -666,7 +668,7 @@ static void port100_recv_ack(struct urb *urb) { struct port100 *dev = urb->context; struct port100_cmd *cmd = dev->cmd; - struct port100_ack_frame *in_frame; + const struct port100_ack_frame *in_frame; int rc; cmd->status = urb->status; @@ -708,7 +710,7 @@ static void port100_recv_ack(struct urb *urb) schedule_work(&dev->cmd_complete_work); } -static int port100_submit_urb_for_ack(struct port100 *dev, gfp_t flags) +static int port100_submit_urb_for_ack(const struct port100 *dev, gfp_t flags) { dev->in_urb->complete = port100_recv_ack; @@ -753,8 +755,9 @@ static int port100_send_ack(struct port100 *dev) return rc; } -static int port100_send_frame_async(struct port100 *dev, struct sk_buff *out, - struct sk_buff *in, int in_len) +static int port100_send_frame_async(struct port100 *dev, + const struct sk_buff *out, + const struct sk_buff *in, int in_len) { int rc; @@ -960,7 +963,7 @@ static void port100_abort_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev) usb_kill_urb(dev->in_urb); } -static struct sk_buff *port100_alloc_skb(struct port100 *dev, unsigned int size) +static struct sk_buff *port100_alloc_skb(const struct port100 *dev, unsigned int size) { struct sk_buff *skb; @@ -1152,7 +1155,7 @@ static int port100_in_configure_hw(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, int type, static void port100_in_comm_rf_complete(struct port100 *dev, void *arg, struct sk_buff *resp) { - struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg = arg; + const struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg = arg; nfc_digital_cmd_complete_t cb = cb_arg->complete_cb; u32 status; int rc; @@ -1330,7 +1333,7 @@ static void port100_tg_comm_rf_complete(struct port100 *dev, void *arg, struct sk_buff *resp) { u32 status; - struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg = arg; + const struct port100_cb_arg *cb_arg = arg; nfc_digital_cmd_complete_t cb = cb_arg->complete_cb; struct port100_tg_comm_rf_res *hdr; @@ -1453,7 +1456,7 @@ static int port100_listen_mdaa(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, static int port100_listen(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, u16 timeout, nfc_digital_cmd_complete_t cb, void *arg) { - struct port100 *dev = nfc_digital_get_drvdata(ddev); + const struct port100 *dev = nfc_digital_get_drvdata(ddev); struct sk_buff *skb; skb = port100_alloc_skb(dev, 0); -- 2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-29 10:40 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-07-29 10:40 [PATCH 00/12] nfc: constify, continued (part 2) Krzysztof Kozlowski 2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 01/12] nfc: constify passed nfc_dev Krzysztof Kozlowski 2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 02/12] nfc: mei_phy: constify buffer passed to mei_nfc_send() Krzysztof Kozlowski 2021-07-29 10:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message] 2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 04/12] nfc: trf7970a: constify several pointers Krzysztof Kozlowski 2021-07-29 15:58 ` Mark Greer 2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 05/12] nfc: virtual_ncidev: constify pointer to nfc_dev Krzysztof Kozlowski 2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 06/12] nfc: nfcsim: constify drvdata (struct nfcsim) Krzysztof Kozlowski 2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 07/12] nfc: fdp: drop unneeded cast for printing firmware size in dev_dbg() Krzysztof Kozlowski 2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 08/12] nfc: fdp: use unsigned int as loop iterator Krzysztof Kozlowski 2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 09/12] nfc: fdp: constify several pointers Krzysztof Kozlowski 2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 10/12] nfc: microread: " Krzysztof Kozlowski 2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 11/12] nfc: mrvl: " Krzysztof Kozlowski 2021-07-29 10:48 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2021-07-29 10:42 ` [PATCH 12/12] nfc: mrvl: constify static nfcmrvl_if_ops Krzysztof Kozlowski 2021-07-29 11:30 ` [PATCH 00/12] nfc: constify, continued (part 2) patchwork-bot+netdevbpf 2021-07-29 11:35 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2021-07-29 11:58 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210729104022.47761-4-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \ --to=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \ --cc=bongsu.jeon@samsung.com \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=kuba@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-nfc@lists.01.org \ --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mgreer@animalcreek.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).