Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
Cc: hch@infradead.org, kw@linux.com, logang@deltatee.com,
	leon@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, rajur@chelsio.com,
	hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 7/9] PCI/sysfs: Add a 10-Bit Tag sysfs file
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 18:49:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210804234954.GA1692741@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1628084828-119542-8-git-send-email-liudongdong3@huawei.com>

On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 09:47:06PM +0800, Dongdong Liu wrote:
> PCIe spec 5.0 r1.0 section 2.2.6.2 says that if an Endpoint supports
> sending Requests to other Endpoints (as opposed to host memory), the
> Endpoint must not send 10-Bit Tag Requests to another given Endpoint
> unless an implementation-specific mechanism determines that the Endpoint
> supports 10-Bit Tag Completer capability. Add a 10bit_tag sysfs file,
> write 0 to disable 10-Bit Tag Requester when the driver does not bind
> the device if the peer device does not support the 10-Bit Tag Completer.
> This will make P2P traffic safe. the 10bit_tag file content indicate
> current 10-Bit Tag Requester Enable status.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci | 16 +++++++-
>  drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c                 | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci
> index 793cbb7..0e0c97d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ Description:
>  		binary file containing the Vital Product Data for the
>  		device.  It should follow the VPD format defined in
>  		PCI Specification 2.1 or 2.2, but users should consider
> -		that some devices may have incorrectly formatted data.  
> +		that some devices may have incorrectly formatted data.
>  		If the underlying VPD has a writable section then the
>  		corresponding section of this file will be writable.
>  
> @@ -407,3 +407,17 @@ Description:
>  
>  		The file is writable if the PF is bound to a driver that
>  		implements ->sriov_set_msix_vec_count().
> +
> +What:		/sys/bus/pci/devices/.../10bit_tag
> +Date:		August 2021
> +Contact:	Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
> +Description:
> +		If a PCI device support 10-Bit Tag Requester, will create the
> +		10bit_tag sysfs file. The file is readable, the value
> +		indicate current 10-Bit Tag Requester Enable.
> +		1 - enabled, 0 - disabled.
> +
> +		The file is also writeable, the value only accept by write 0
> +		to disable 10-Bit Tag Requester when the driver does not bind
> +		the deivce. The typical use case is for p2pdma when the peer
> +		device does not support 10-BIT Tag Completer.

s/writeable/writable/
s/deivce/device/

The first sentence does not parse.

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> index 5d63df7..e93ce8b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> @@ -306,6 +306,49 @@ static ssize_t enable_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>  }
>  static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(enable);
>  
> +static ssize_t pci_10bit_tag_store(struct device *dev,
> +				   struct device_attribute *attr,
> +				   const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +	bool enable;
> +
> +	if (kstrtobool(buf, &enable) < 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (enable != false )
> +		return -EINVAL;

Is this the same as "if (enable)"?

> +	if (pdev->driver)
> +		 return -EBUSY;
> +
> +	pcie_capability_clear_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,
> +				   PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_10BIT_TAG_REQ_EN);
> +	pci_info(pdev, "disabled 10-Bit Tag Requester\n");
> +
> +	return count;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t pci_10bit_tag_show(struct device *dev,
> +				  struct device_attribute *attr,
> +				  char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +	u16 ctl;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2, &ctl);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n",
> +			  !!(ctl & PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_10BIT_TAG_REQ_EN));
> +}
> +
> +static struct device_attribute dev_attr_10bit_tag = __ATTR(10bit_tag, 0600,
> +							   pci_10bit_tag_show,
> +							   pci_10bit_tag_store);

Is this DEVICE_ATTR_ADMIN_RW()?

Why is it 0600?  Everything else in this file looks like
DEVICE_ATTR_RO or DEVICE_ATTR_RW.  This should be the same unless
there's a reason to be different.

>  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>  static ssize_t numa_node_store(struct device *dev,
>  			       struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf,
> @@ -635,6 +678,11 @@ static struct attribute *pcie_dev_attrs[] = {
>  	NULL,
>  };
>  
> +static struct attribute *pcie_dev_10bit_tag_attrs[] = {
> +	&dev_attr_10bit_tag.attr,
> +	NULL,
> +};
> +
>  static struct attribute *pcibus_attrs[] = {
>  	&dev_attr_bus_rescan.attr,
>  	&dev_attr_cpuaffinity.attr,
> @@ -1482,6 +1530,21 @@ static umode_t pcie_dev_attrs_are_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static umode_t pcie_dev_10bit_tag_attrs_are_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> +					  struct attribute *a, int n)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +
> +	if (pdev->is_virtfn)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (!(pdev->pcie_devcap2 & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_10BIT_TAG_REQ))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return a->mode;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct attribute_group pci_dev_group = {
>  	.attrs = pci_dev_attrs,
>  };
> @@ -1521,6 +1584,11 @@ static const struct attribute_group pcie_dev_attr_group = {
>  	.is_visible = pcie_dev_attrs_are_visible,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct attribute_group pcie_dev_10bit_tag_attr_group = {
> +	.attrs = pcie_dev_10bit_tag_attrs,
> +	.is_visible = pcie_dev_10bit_tag_attrs_are_visible,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct attribute_group *pci_dev_attr_groups[] = {
>  	&pci_dev_attr_group,
>  	&pci_dev_hp_attr_group,
> @@ -1530,6 +1598,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group *pci_dev_attr_groups[] = {
>  #endif
>  	&pci_bridge_attr_group,
>  	&pcie_dev_attr_group,
> +	&pcie_dev_10bit_tag_attr_group,
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEAER
>  	&aer_stats_attr_group,
>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-04 23:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-04 13:46 [PATCH V7 0/9] PCI: Enable 10-Bit tag support for PCIe devices Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 1/9] PCI: Use cached Device Capabilities Register Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 2/9] PCI: Use cached Device Capabilities 2 Register Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 3/9] PCI: Add 10-Bit Tag register definitions Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 4/9] PCI: Enable 10-Bit Tag support for PCIe Endpoint devices Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 23:17   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-05  7:47     ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-05 19:54       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-07  6:19         ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 5/9] PCI/IOV: Enable 10-Bit tag support for PCIe VF devices Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 23:29   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-05  8:03     ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-06 22:59       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-07  7:46         ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 6/9] PCI: Enable 10-Bit Tag support for PCIe RP devices Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 23:38   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-05  8:25     ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-09 17:26       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-10 11:59         ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 7/9] PCI/sysfs: Add a 10-Bit Tag sysfs file Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 15:51   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2021-08-05 13:14     ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-05 13:53       ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-08-05 15:36       ` Logan Gunthorpe
2021-08-04 23:49   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2021-08-05  8:37     ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-05 15:31       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-07  7:01         ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-09 17:37           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-10 12:16             ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 23:52   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-05  8:38     ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 8/9] PCI/IOV: Add 10-Bit Tag sysfs files for VF devices Dongdong Liu
2021-08-05  0:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-05  8:47     ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-05  9:39     ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 13:47 ` [PATCH V7 9/9] PCI/P2PDMA: Add a 10-Bit Tag check in P2PDMA Dongdong Liu
2021-08-04 15:56   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2021-08-05  8:49     ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-05 18:12   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-07  7:11     ` Dongdong Liu
2021-08-09 17:31       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-10 12:31         ` Dongdong Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210804234954.GA1692741@bjorn-Precision-5520 \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liudongdong3@huawei.com \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rajur@chelsio.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH V7 7/9] PCI/sysfs: Add a 10-Bit Tag sysfs file' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).