Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
iii@linux.ibm.com
Cc: kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 03/13] bpf/tests: Add exhaustive tests of ALU shift values
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 20:52:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210902185229.1840281-4-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210902185229.1840281-1-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
This patch adds a set of tests for ALU64 and ALU32 shift operations to
verify correctness for all possible values of the shift value. Mainly
intended for JIT testing.
Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
---
lib/test_bpf.c | 257 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 257 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index f0651dc6450b..69f8d4c1df33 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -497,6 +497,165 @@ static int bpf_fill_long_jmp(struct bpf_test *self)
return 0;
}
+static int __bpf_ld_imm64(struct bpf_insn insns[2], u8 reg, s64 imm64)
+{
+ struct bpf_insn tmp[] = {BPF_LD_IMM64(reg, imm64)};
+
+ memcpy(insns, tmp, sizeof(tmp));
+ return 2;
+}
+
+/* Test an ALU shift operation for all valid shift values */
+static int __bpf_fill_alu_shift(struct bpf_test *self, u8 op,
+ u8 mode, bool alu32)
+{
+ static const s64 regs[] = {
+ 0x0123456789abcdefLL, /* dword > 0, word < 0 */
+ 0xfedcba9876543210LL, /* dowrd < 0, word > 0 */
+ 0xfedcba0198765432LL, /* dowrd < 0, word < 0 */
+ 0x0123458967abcdefLL, /* dword > 0, word > 0 */
+ };
+ int bits = alu32 ? 32 : 64;
+ int len = (2 + 8 * bits) * ARRAY_SIZE(regs) + 2;
+ struct bpf_insn *insn;
+ int imm, k;
+ int i = 0;
+
+ insn = kmalloc_array(len, sizeof(*insn), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!insn)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (k = 0; k < ARRAY_SIZE(regs); k++) {
+ s64 reg = regs[k];
+
+ i += __bpf_ld_imm64(&insn[i], R3, reg);
+
+ for (imm = 0; imm < bits; imm++) {
+ u64 val;
+
+ /* Perform operation */
+ insn[i++] = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, R1, R3);
+ insn[i++] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R2, imm);
+ if (alu32) {
+ if (mode == BPF_K)
+ insn[i++] = BPF_ALU32_IMM(op, R1, imm);
+ else
+ insn[i++] = BPF_ALU32_REG(op, R1, R2);
+ switch (op) {
+ case BPF_LSH:
+ val = (u32)reg << imm;
+ break;
+ case BPF_RSH:
+ val = (u32)reg >> imm;
+ break;
+ case BPF_ARSH:
+ val = (u32)reg >> imm;
+ if (imm > 0 && (reg & 0x80000000))
+ val |= ~(u32)0 << (32 - imm);
+ break;
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (mode == BPF_K)
+ insn[i++] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(op, R1, imm);
+ else
+ insn[i++] = BPF_ALU64_REG(op, R1, R2);
+ switch (op) {
+ case BPF_LSH:
+ val = (u64)reg << imm;
+ break;
+ case BPF_RSH:
+ val = (u64)reg >> imm;
+ break;
+ case BPF_ARSH:
+ val = (u64)reg >> imm;
+ if (imm > 0 && reg < 0)
+ val |= ~(u64)0 << (64 - imm);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Load reference */
+ i += __bpf_ld_imm64(&insn[i], R4, val);
+
+ /* For diagnostic purposes */
+ insn[i++] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, i);
+
+ /* Check result */
+ insn[i++] = BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JEQ, R1, R4, 1);
+ insn[i++] = BPF_EXIT_INSN();
+ }
+ }
+
+ insn[i++] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 1);
+ insn[i++] = BPF_EXIT_INSN();
+
+ self->u.ptr.insns = insn;
+ self->u.ptr.len = len;
+ BUG_ON(i > len);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int bpf_fill_alu_lsh_imm(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+ return __bpf_fill_alu_shift(self, BPF_LSH, BPF_K, false);
+}
+
+static int bpf_fill_alu_rsh_imm(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+ return __bpf_fill_alu_shift(self, BPF_RSH, BPF_K, false);
+}
+
+static int bpf_fill_alu_arsh_imm(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+ return __bpf_fill_alu_shift(self, BPF_ARSH, BPF_K, false);
+}
+
+static int bpf_fill_alu_lsh_reg(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+ return __bpf_fill_alu_shift(self, BPF_LSH, BPF_X, false);
+}
+
+static int bpf_fill_alu_rsh_reg(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+ return __bpf_fill_alu_shift(self, BPF_RSH, BPF_X, false);
+}
+
+static int bpf_fill_alu_arsh_reg(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+ return __bpf_fill_alu_shift(self, BPF_ARSH, BPF_X, false);
+}
+
+static int bpf_fill_alu32_lsh_imm(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+ return __bpf_fill_alu_shift(self, BPF_LSH, BPF_K, true);
+}
+
+static int bpf_fill_alu32_rsh_imm(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+ return __bpf_fill_alu_shift(self, BPF_RSH, BPF_K, true);
+}
+
+static int bpf_fill_alu32_arsh_imm(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+ return __bpf_fill_alu_shift(self, BPF_ARSH, BPF_K, true);
+}
+
+static int bpf_fill_alu32_lsh_reg(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+ return __bpf_fill_alu_shift(self, BPF_LSH, BPF_X, true);
+}
+
+static int bpf_fill_alu32_rsh_reg(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+ return __bpf_fill_alu_shift(self, BPF_RSH, BPF_X, true);
+}
+
+static int bpf_fill_alu32_arsh_reg(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+ return __bpf_fill_alu_shift(self, BPF_ARSH, BPF_X, true);
+}
+
static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
{
"TAX",
@@ -8414,6 +8573,104 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
{},
{ { 0, 2 } },
},
+ /* Exhaustive test of ALU64 shift operations */
+ {
+ "ALU64_LSH_K: all shift values",
+ { },
+ INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_alu_lsh_imm,
+ },
+ {
+ "ALU64_RSH_K: all shift values",
+ { },
+ INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_alu_rsh_imm,
+ },
+ {
+ "ALU64_ARSH_K: all shift values",
+ { },
+ INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_alu_arsh_imm,
+ },
+ {
+ "ALU64_LSH_X: all shift values",
+ { },
+ INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_alu_lsh_reg,
+ },
+ {
+ "ALU64_RSH_X: all shift values",
+ { },
+ INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_alu_rsh_reg,
+ },
+ {
+ "ALU64_ARSH_X: all shift values",
+ { },
+ INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_alu_arsh_reg,
+ },
+ /* Exhaustive test of ALU32 shift operations */
+ {
+ "ALU32_LSH_K: all shift values",
+ { },
+ INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_alu32_lsh_imm,
+ },
+ {
+ "ALU32_RSH_K: all shift values",
+ { },
+ INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_alu32_rsh_imm,
+ },
+ {
+ "ALU32_ARSH_K: all shift values",
+ { },
+ INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_alu32_arsh_imm,
+ },
+ {
+ "ALU32_LSH_X: all shift values",
+ { },
+ INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_alu32_lsh_reg,
+ },
+ {
+ "ALU32_RSH_X: all shift values",
+ { },
+ INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_alu32_rsh_reg,
+ },
+ {
+ "ALU32_ARSH_X: all shift values",
+ { },
+ INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_alu32_arsh_reg,
+ },
};
static struct net_device dev;
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-02 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-02 18:52 [PATCH bpf-next 00/13] bpf/tests: Extend JIT test suite coverage Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/13] bpf/tests: Allow different number of runs per test case Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/13] bpf/tests: Reduce memory footprint of test suite Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` Johan Almbladh [this message]
2021-09-03 6:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/13] bpf/tests: Add exhaustive tests of ALU shift values kernel test robot
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/13] bpf/tests: Add exhaustive tests of ALU operand magnitudes Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/13] bpf/tests: Add exhaustive tests of JMP " Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/13] bpf/tests: Add staggered JMP and JMP32 tests Johan Almbladh
2021-09-03 8:22 ` Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/13] bpf/tests: Add exhaustive test of LD_IMM64 immediate magnitudes Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/13] bpf/tests: Add test case flag for verifier zero-extension Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/13] bpf/tests: Add JMP tests with small offsets Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/13] bpf/tests: Add JMP tests with degenerate conditional Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/13] bpf/tests: Expand branch conversion JIT test Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/13] bpf/tests: Add more BPF_END byte order conversion tests Johan Almbladh
2021-09-02 18:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/13] bpf/tests: Add tail call limit test with external function call Johan Almbladh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210902185229.1840281-4-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com \
--to=johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH bpf-next 03/13] bpf/tests: Add exhaustive tests of ALU shift values' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).