Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next v4 0/6] virtio/vsock: introduce MSG_EOR flag for SEQPACKET
@ 2021-09-03  6:13 Arseny Krasnov
  2021-09-03  6:14 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/6] virtio/vsock: rename 'EOR' to 'EOM' bit Arseny Krasnov
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Arseny Krasnov @ 2021-09-03  6:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Hajnoczi, Stefano Garzarella, Michael S. Tsirkin,
	Jason Wang, David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Arseny Krasnov,
	Norbert Slusarek, Andra Paraschiv, Colin Ian King
  Cc: kvm, virtualization, netdev, linux-kernel, stsp2, oxffffaa

	This patchset implements support of MSG_EOR bit for SEQPACKET
AF_VSOCK sockets over virtio transport.
	First we need to define 'messages' and 'records' like this:
Message is result of sending calls: 'write()', 'send()', 'sendmsg()'
etc. It has fixed maximum length, and it bounds are visible using
return from receive calls: 'read()', 'recv()', 'recvmsg()' etc.
Current implementation based on message definition above.
	Record has unlimited length, it consists of multiple message,
and bounds of record are visible via MSG_EOR flag returned from
'recvmsg()' call. Sender passes MSG_EOR to sending system call and
receiver will see MSG_EOR when corresponding message will be processed.
	Idea of patchset comes from POSIX: it says that SEQPACKET
supports record boundaries which are visible for receiver using
MSG_EOR bit. So, it looks like MSG_EOR is enough thing for SEQPACKET
and we don't need to maintain boundaries of corresponding send -
receive system calls. But, for 'sendXXX()' and 'recXXX()' POSIX says,
that all these calls operates with messages, e.g. 'sendXXX()' sends
message, while 'recXXX()' reads messages and for SEQPACKET, 'recXXX()'
must read one entire message from socket, dropping all out of size
bytes. Thus, both message boundaries and MSG_EOR bit must be supported
to follow POSIX rules.
	To support MSG_EOR new bit was added along with existing
'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR': 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM'(end-of-message) - now it
works in the same way as 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR'. But 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR'
is used to mark 'MSG_EOR' bit passed from userspace.
	This patchset includes simple test for MSG_EOR.

 Arseny Krasnov(6):
  virtio/vsock: rename 'EOR' to 'EOM' bit.
  virtio/vsock: add 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR' bit.
  vhost/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing
  virtio/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing
  af_vsock: rename variables in receive loop
  vsock_test: update message bounds test for MSG_EOR

 drivers/vhost/vsock.c                   | 28 +++++++++++++----------
 include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h       |  3 ++-
 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c                | 10 ++++----
 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 23 ++++++++++++-------
 tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c        |  8 ++++++-
 5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

 v3 -> v4:
 - 'sendXXX()' renamed to 'send*()' in 0002- commit msg.
 - Comment about bit restore updated in 0003-.
 - 'same' renamed to 'similar' in 0003- commit msg.
 - u32 used instead of uint32_t in 0003-.

 v2 -> v3:
 - 'virtio/vsock: rename 'EOR' to 'EOM' bit.' - commit message updated.
 - 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR' bit add moved to separate patch.
 - 'vhost/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing' - commit message
   updated.
 - 'vhost/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing' - removed unneeded
   'le32_to_cpu()', because input argument was already in CPU
   endianness.

 v1 -> v2:
 - 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR' is renamed to 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM', to
   support backward compatibility.
 - use bitmask of flags to restore in vhost.c, instead of separated
   bool variable for each flag.
 - test for EAGAIN removed, as logically it is not part of this
   patchset(will be sent separately).
 - cover letter updated(added part with POSIX description).

Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>

-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v4 1/6] virtio/vsock: rename 'EOR' to 'EOM' bit.
  2021-09-03  6:13 [PATCH net-next v4 0/6] virtio/vsock: introduce MSG_EOR flag for SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
@ 2021-09-03  6:14 ` Arseny Krasnov
  2021-09-03  6:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/6] virtio/vsock: add 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR' bit Arseny Krasnov
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Arseny Krasnov @ 2021-09-03  6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Hajnoczi, Stefano Garzarella, Michael S. Tsirkin,
	Jason Wang, David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Arseny Krasnov,
	Norbert Slusarek, Colin Ian King, Andra Paraschiv
  Cc: kvm, virtualization, netdev, linux-kernel, stsp2, oxffffaa

This current implemented bit is used to mark end of messages
('EOM' - end of message), not records('EOR' - end of record).
Also rename 'record' to 'message' in implementation as it is
different things.

Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/vhost/vsock.c                   | 12 ++++++------
 include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h       |  2 +-
 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 14 +++++++-------
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
index f249622ef11b..feaf650affbe 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
@@ -178,15 +178,15 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
 			 * small rx buffers, headers of packets in rx queue are
 			 * created dynamically and are initialized with header
 			 * of current packet(except length). But in case of
-			 * SOCK_SEQPACKET, we also must clear record delimeter
-			 * bit(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR). Otherwise, instead of one
-			 * packet with delimeter(which marks end of record),
+			 * SOCK_SEQPACKET, we also must clear message delimeter
+			 * bit(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM). Otherwise, instead of one
+			 * packet with delimeter(which marks end of message),
 			 * there will be sequence of packets with delimeter
 			 * bit set. After initialized header will be copied to
 			 * rx buffer, this bit will be restored.
 			 */
-			if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR) {
-				pkt->hdr.flags &= ~cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR);
+			if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
+				pkt->hdr.flags &= ~cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM);
 				restore_flag = true;
 			}
 		}
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
 		 */
 		if (pkt->off < pkt->len) {
 			if (restore_flag)
-				pkt->hdr.flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR);
+				pkt->hdr.flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM);
 
 			/* We are queueing the same virtio_vsock_pkt to handle
 			 * the remaining bytes, and we want to deliver it
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h
index 3dd3555b2740..8485b004a5f8 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ enum virtio_vsock_shutdown {
 
 /* VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW flags values */
 enum virtio_vsock_rw {
-	VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR = 1,
+	VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM = 1,
 };
 
 #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_VSOCK_H */
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
index 081e7ae93cb1..4d5a93beceb0 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ virtio_transport_alloc_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info,
 
 		if (msg_data_left(info->msg) == 0 &&
 		    info->type == VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_SEQPACKET)
-			pkt->hdr.flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR);
+			pkt->hdr.flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM);
 	}
 
 	trace_virtio_transport_alloc_pkt(src_cid, src_port,
@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ static int virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
 				dequeued_len += pkt_len;
 		}
 
-		if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR) {
+		if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
 			msg_ready = true;
 			vvs->msg_count--;
 		}
@@ -1029,7 +1029,7 @@ virtio_transport_recv_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)
+	if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM)
 		vvs->msg_count++;
 
 	/* Try to copy small packets into the buffer of last packet queued,
@@ -1044,12 +1044,12 @@ virtio_transport_recv_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
 
 		/* If there is space in the last packet queued, we copy the
 		 * new packet in its buffer. We avoid this if the last packet
-		 * queued has VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR set, because this is
-		 * delimiter of SEQPACKET record, so 'pkt' is the first packet
-		 * of a new record.
+		 * queued has VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM set, because this is
+		 * delimiter of SEQPACKET message, so 'pkt' is the first packet
+		 * of a new message.
 		 */
 		if ((pkt->len <= last_pkt->buf_len - last_pkt->len) &&
-		    !(le32_to_cpu(last_pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)) {
+		    !(le32_to_cpu(last_pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM)) {
 			memcpy(last_pkt->buf + last_pkt->len, pkt->buf,
 			       pkt->len);
 			last_pkt->len += pkt->len;
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v4 2/6] virtio/vsock: add 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR' bit.
  2021-09-03  6:13 [PATCH net-next v4 0/6] virtio/vsock: introduce MSG_EOR flag for SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
  2021-09-03  6:14 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/6] virtio/vsock: rename 'EOR' to 'EOM' bit Arseny Krasnov
@ 2021-09-03  6:15 ` Arseny Krasnov
  2021-09-05 15:50   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
  2021-09-03  6:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/6] vhost/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing Arseny Krasnov
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Arseny Krasnov @ 2021-09-03  6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Hajnoczi, Stefano Garzarella, Michael S. Tsirkin,
	Jason Wang, David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Arseny Krasnov,
	Norbert Slusarek, Andra Paraschiv, Colin Ian King
  Cc: kvm, virtualization, netdev, linux-kernel, stsp2, oxffffaa

This bit is used to handle POSIX MSG_EOR flag passed from
userspace in 'send*()' system calls. It marks end of each
record and is visible to receiver using 'recvmsg()' system
call.

Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
 include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h
index 8485b004a5f8..64738838bee5 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ enum virtio_vsock_shutdown {
 /* VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW flags values */
 enum virtio_vsock_rw {
 	VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM = 1,
+	VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR = 2,
 };
 
 #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_VSOCK_H */
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v4 3/6] vhost/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing
  2021-09-03  6:13 [PATCH net-next v4 0/6] virtio/vsock: introduce MSG_EOR flag for SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
  2021-09-03  6:14 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/6] virtio/vsock: rename 'EOR' to 'EOM' bit Arseny Krasnov
  2021-09-03  6:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/6] virtio/vsock: add 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR' bit Arseny Krasnov
@ 2021-09-03  6:15 ` Arseny Krasnov
  2021-09-03  6:55   ` Stefano Garzarella
  2021-09-03 12:05   ` kernel test robot
  2021-09-03  6:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/6] virtio/vsock: " Arseny Krasnov
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Arseny Krasnov @ 2021-09-03  6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Hajnoczi, Stefano Garzarella, Michael S. Tsirkin,
	Jason Wang, David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Arseny Krasnov,
	Norbert Slusarek, Colin Ian King, Andra Paraschiv
  Cc: kvm, virtualization, netdev, linux-kernel, stsp2, oxffffaa

'MSG_EOR' handling has similar logic as 'MSG_EOM' - if bit present
in packet's header, reset it to 0. Then restore it back if packet
processing wasn't completed. Instead of bool variable for each
flag, bit mask variable was added: it has logical OR of 'MSG_EOR'
and 'MSG_EOM' if needed, to restore flags, this variable is ORed
with flags field of packet.

Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
---
 drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
index feaf650affbe..93e8d635e18f 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
 		size_t nbytes;
 		size_t iov_len, payload_len;
 		int head;
-		bool restore_flag = false;
+		u32 flags_to_restore = 0;
 
 		spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
 		if (list_empty(&vsock->send_pkt_list)) {
@@ -179,15 +179,20 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
 			 * created dynamically and are initialized with header
 			 * of current packet(except length). But in case of
 			 * SOCK_SEQPACKET, we also must clear message delimeter
-			 * bit(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM). Otherwise, instead of one
-			 * packet with delimeter(which marks end of message),
-			 * there will be sequence of packets with delimeter
-			 * bit set. After initialized header will be copied to
-			 * rx buffer, this bit will be restored.
+			 * bit (VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) and MSG_EOR bit
+			 * (VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR) if set. Otherwise,
+			 * there will be sequence of packets with these
+			 * bits set. After initialized header will be copied to
+			 * rx buffer, these required bits will be restored.
 			 */
 			if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
 				pkt->hdr.flags &= ~cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM);
-				restore_flag = true;
+				flags_to_restore |= VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM;
+
+				if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)) {
+					pkt->hdr.flags &= ~cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR);
+					flags_to_restore |= VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR;
+				}
 			}
 		}
 
@@ -224,8 +229,7 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
 		 * to send it with the next available buffer.
 		 */
 		if (pkt->off < pkt->len) {
-			if (restore_flag)
-				pkt->hdr.flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM);
+			pkt->hdr.flags |= cpu_to_le32(flags_to_restore);
 
 			/* We are queueing the same virtio_vsock_pkt to handle
 			 * the remaining bytes, and we want to deliver it
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v4 4/6] virtio/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing
  2021-09-03  6:13 [PATCH net-next v4 0/6] virtio/vsock: introduce MSG_EOR flag for SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-09-03  6:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/6] vhost/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing Arseny Krasnov
@ 2021-09-03  6:15 ` Arseny Krasnov
  2021-09-03  6:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/6] af_vsock: rename variables in receive loop Arseny Krasnov
  2021-09-03  6:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 6/6] vsock_test: update message bounds test for MSG_EOR Arseny Krasnov
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Arseny Krasnov @ 2021-09-03  6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Hajnoczi, Stefano Garzarella, Michael S. Tsirkin,
	Jason Wang, David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Arseny Krasnov,
	Norbert Slusarek, Andra Paraschiv, Colin Ian King
  Cc: kvm, virtualization, netdev, linux-kernel, stsp2, oxffffaa

If packet has 'EOR' bit - set MSG_EOR in 'recvmsg()' flags.

Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
index 4d5a93beceb0..59ee1be5a6dd 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
@@ -76,8 +76,12 @@ virtio_transport_alloc_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info,
 			goto out;
 
 		if (msg_data_left(info->msg) == 0 &&
-		    info->type == VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_SEQPACKET)
+		    info->type == VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_SEQPACKET) {
 			pkt->hdr.flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM);
+
+			if (info->msg->msg_flags & MSG_EOR)
+				pkt->hdr.flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR);
+		}
 	}
 
 	trace_virtio_transport_alloc_pkt(src_cid, src_port,
@@ -460,6 +464,9 @@ static int virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
 		if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
 			msg_ready = true;
 			vvs->msg_count--;
+
+			if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)
+				msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
 		}
 
 		virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, pkt);
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v4 5/6] af_vsock: rename variables in receive loop
  2021-09-03  6:13 [PATCH net-next v4 0/6] virtio/vsock: introduce MSG_EOR flag for SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-09-03  6:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/6] virtio/vsock: " Arseny Krasnov
@ 2021-09-03  6:16 ` Arseny Krasnov
  2021-09-03  6:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 6/6] vsock_test: update message bounds test for MSG_EOR Arseny Krasnov
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Arseny Krasnov @ 2021-09-03  6:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Hajnoczi, Stefano Garzarella, Michael S. Tsirkin,
	Jason Wang, David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Arseny Krasnov,
	Norbert Slusarek, Colin Ian King, Andra Paraschiv
  Cc: kvm, virtualization, netdev, linux-kernel, stsp2, oxffffaa

Record is supported via MSG_EOR flag, while current logic operates
with message, so rename variables from 'record' to 'message'.

Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 3e02cc3b24f8..e2c0cfb334d2 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -2014,7 +2014,7 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
 {
 	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
 	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
-	ssize_t record_len;
+	ssize_t msg_len;
 	long timeout;
 	int err = 0;
 	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
@@ -2028,9 +2028,9 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
 	if (err <= 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	record_len = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags);
+	msg_len = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags);
 
-	if (record_len < 0) {
+	if (msg_len < 0) {
 		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -2044,14 +2044,14 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
 		 * packet.
 		 */
 		if (flags & MSG_TRUNC)
-			err = record_len;
+			err = msg_len;
 		else
 			err = len - msg_data_left(msg);
 
 		/* Always set MSG_TRUNC if real length of packet is
 		 * bigger than user's buffer.
 		 */
-		if (record_len > len)
+		if (msg_len > len)
 			msg->msg_flags |= MSG_TRUNC;
 	}
 
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v4 6/6] vsock_test: update message bounds test for MSG_EOR
  2021-09-03  6:13 [PATCH net-next v4 0/6] virtio/vsock: introduce MSG_EOR flag for SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-09-03  6:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/6] af_vsock: rename variables in receive loop Arseny Krasnov
@ 2021-09-03  6:16 ` Arseny Krasnov
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Arseny Krasnov @ 2021-09-03  6:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Hajnoczi, Stefano Garzarella, Michael S. Tsirkin,
	Jason Wang, David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Arseny Krasnov,
	Colin Ian King, Norbert Slusarek, Andra Paraschiv
  Cc: kvm, virtualization, netdev, linux-kernel, stsp2, oxffffaa

Set 'MSG_EOR' in one of message sent, check that 'MSG_EOR'
is visible in corresponding message at receiver.

Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
 tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
index 67766bfe176f..2a3638c0a008 100644
--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
@@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
 }
 
 #define MESSAGES_CNT 7
+#define MSG_EOR_IDX (MESSAGES_CNT / 2)
 static void test_seqpacket_msg_bounds_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
 {
 	int fd;
@@ -294,7 +295,7 @@ static void test_seqpacket_msg_bounds_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
 
 	/* Send several messages, one with MSG_EOR flag */
 	for (int i = 0; i < MESSAGES_CNT; i++)
-		send_byte(fd, 1, 0);
+		send_byte(fd, 1, (i == MSG_EOR_IDX) ? MSG_EOR : 0);
 
 	control_writeln("SENDDONE");
 	close(fd);
@@ -324,6 +325,11 @@ static void test_seqpacket_msg_bounds_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
 			perror("message bound violated");
 			exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
 		}
+
+		if ((i == MSG_EOR_IDX) ^ !!(msg.msg_flags & MSG_EOR)) {
+			perror("MSG_EOR");
+			exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+		}
 	}
 
 	close(fd);
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/6] vhost/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing
  2021-09-03  6:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/6] vhost/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing Arseny Krasnov
@ 2021-09-03  6:55   ` Stefano Garzarella
  2021-09-03 12:14     ` Stefano Garzarella
  2021-09-03 12:05   ` kernel test robot
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Garzarella @ 2021-09-03  6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arseny Krasnov
  Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, Michael S. Tsirkin, Jason Wang, David S. Miller,
	Jakub Kicinski, Norbert Slusarek, Colin Ian King,
	Andra Paraschiv, kvm, virtualization, netdev, linux-kernel,
	stsp2, oxffffaa

On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 09:15:38AM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>'MSG_EOR' handling has similar logic as 'MSG_EOM' - if bit present
>in packet's header, reset it to 0. Then restore it back if packet
>processing wasn't completed. Instead of bool variable for each
>flag, bit mask variable was added: it has logical OR of 'MSG_EOR'
>and 'MSG_EOM' if needed, to restore flags, this variable is ORed
>with flags field of packet.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
>---
> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>index feaf650affbe..93e8d635e18f 100644
>--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
> 		size_t nbytes;
> 		size_t iov_len, payload_len;
> 		int head;
>-		bool restore_flag = false;
>+		u32 flags_to_restore = 0;
>
> 		spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
> 		if (list_empty(&vsock->send_pkt_list)) {
>@@ -179,15 +179,20 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
> 			 * created dynamically and are initialized with header
> 			 * of current packet(except length). But in case of
> 			 * SOCK_SEQPACKET, we also must clear message delimeter
>-			 * bit(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM). Otherwise, instead of one
>-			 * packet with delimeter(which marks end of message),
>-			 * there will be sequence of packets with delimeter
>-			 * bit set. After initialized header will be copied to
>-			 * rx buffer, this bit will be restored.
>+			 * bit (VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) and MSG_EOR bit
>+			 * (VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR) if set. Otherwise,
>+			 * there will be sequence of packets with these
>+			 * bits set. After initialized header will be copied to
>+			 * rx buffer, these required bits will be restored.
> 			 */
> 			if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
> 				pkt->hdr.flags &= ~cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM);
>-				restore_flag = true;
>+				flags_to_restore |= VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM;
>+
>+				if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)) {
>+					pkt->hdr.flags &= ~cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR);
>+					flags_to_restore |= VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR;
>+				}
> 			}
> 		}
>
>@@ -224,8 +229,7 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
> 		 * to send it with the next available buffer.
> 		 */
> 		if (pkt->off < pkt->len) {
>-			if (restore_flag)
>-				pkt->hdr.flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM);
>+			pkt->hdr.flags |= cpu_to_le32(flags_to_restore);
>
> 			/* We are queueing the same virtio_vsock_pkt to handle
> 			 * the remaining bytes, and we want to deliver it
>-- 
>2.25.1
>

Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/6] vhost/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing
  2021-09-03  6:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/6] vhost/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing Arseny Krasnov
  2021-09-03  6:55   ` Stefano Garzarella
@ 2021-09-03 12:05   ` kernel test robot
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2021-09-03 12:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arseny Krasnov, Stefan Hajnoczi, Stefano Garzarella,
	Michael S. Tsirkin, Jason Wang, David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski,
	Norbert Slusarek, Colin Ian King
  Cc: kbuild-all, netdev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7727 bytes --]

Hi Arseny,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on net-next/master]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Arseny-Krasnov/virtio-vsock-introduce-MSG_EOR-flag-for-SEQPACKET/20210903-141720
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git 29ce8f9701072fc221d9c38ad952de1a9578f95c
config: i386-randconfig-s001-20210903 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        # sparse version: v0.6.4-rc1-dirty
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/18c4eca4204f01fb1f94bf35e760436cb537d9b3
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Arseny-Krasnov/virtio-vsock-introduce-MSG_EOR-flag-for-SEQPACKET/20210903-141720
        git checkout 18c4eca4204f01fb1f94bf35e760436cb537d9b3
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/vhost/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/vhost/vsock.c:192:37: sparse: sparse: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
>> drivers/vhost/vsock.c:192:37: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __le32

vim +192 drivers/vhost/vsock.c

    89	
    90	static void
    91	vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
    92				    struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
    93	{
    94		struct vhost_virtqueue *tx_vq = &vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_TX];
    95		int pkts = 0, total_len = 0;
    96		bool added = false;
    97		bool restart_tx = false;
    98	
    99		mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
   100	
   101		if (!vhost_vq_get_backend(vq))
   102			goto out;
   103	
   104		if (!vq_meta_prefetch(vq))
   105			goto out;
   106	
   107		/* Avoid further vmexits, we're already processing the virtqueue */
   108		vhost_disable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq);
   109	
   110		do {
   111			struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
   112			struct iov_iter iov_iter;
   113			unsigned out, in;
   114			size_t nbytes;
   115			size_t iov_len, payload_len;
   116			int head;
   117			u32 flags_to_restore = 0;
   118	
   119			spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
   120			if (list_empty(&vsock->send_pkt_list)) {
   121				spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
   122				vhost_enable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq);
   123				break;
   124			}
   125	
   126			pkt = list_first_entry(&vsock->send_pkt_list,
   127					       struct virtio_vsock_pkt, list);
   128			list_del_init(&pkt->list);
   129			spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
   130	
   131			head = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov),
   132						 &out, &in, NULL, NULL);
   133			if (head < 0) {
   134				spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
   135				list_add(&pkt->list, &vsock->send_pkt_list);
   136				spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
   137				break;
   138			}
   139	
   140			if (head == vq->num) {
   141				spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
   142				list_add(&pkt->list, &vsock->send_pkt_list);
   143				spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
   144	
   145				/* We cannot finish yet if more buffers snuck in while
   146				 * re-enabling notify.
   147				 */
   148				if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq))) {
   149					vhost_disable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq);
   150					continue;
   151				}
   152				break;
   153			}
   154	
   155			if (out) {
   156				virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
   157				vq_err(vq, "Expected 0 output buffers, got %u\n", out);
   158				break;
   159			}
   160	
   161			iov_len = iov_length(&vq->iov[out], in);
   162			if (iov_len < sizeof(pkt->hdr)) {
   163				virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
   164				vq_err(vq, "Buffer len [%zu] too small\n", iov_len);
   165				break;
   166			}
   167	
   168			iov_iter_init(&iov_iter, READ, &vq->iov[out], in, iov_len);
   169			payload_len = pkt->len - pkt->off;
   170	
   171			/* If the packet is greater than the space available in the
   172			 * buffer, we split it using multiple buffers.
   173			 */
   174			if (payload_len > iov_len - sizeof(pkt->hdr)) {
   175				payload_len = iov_len - sizeof(pkt->hdr);
   176	
   177				/* As we are copying pieces of large packet's buffer to
   178				 * small rx buffers, headers of packets in rx queue are
   179				 * created dynamically and are initialized with header
   180				 * of current packet(except length). But in case of
   181				 * SOCK_SEQPACKET, we also must clear message delimeter
   182				 * bit (VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) and MSG_EOR bit
   183				 * (VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR) if set. Otherwise,
   184				 * there will be sequence of packets with these
   185				 * bits set. After initialized header will be copied to
   186				 * rx buffer, these required bits will be restored.
   187				 */
   188				if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
   189					pkt->hdr.flags &= ~cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM);
   190					flags_to_restore |= VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM;
   191	
 > 192					if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)) {
   193						pkt->hdr.flags &= ~cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR);
   194						flags_to_restore |= VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR;
   195					}
   196				}
   197			}
   198	
   199			/* Set the correct length in the header */
   200			pkt->hdr.len = cpu_to_le32(payload_len);
   201	
   202			nbytes = copy_to_iter(&pkt->hdr, sizeof(pkt->hdr), &iov_iter);
   203			if (nbytes != sizeof(pkt->hdr)) {
   204				virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
   205				vq_err(vq, "Faulted on copying pkt hdr\n");
   206				break;
   207			}
   208	
   209			nbytes = copy_to_iter(pkt->buf + pkt->off, payload_len,
   210					      &iov_iter);
   211			if (nbytes != payload_len) {
   212				virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
   213				vq_err(vq, "Faulted on copying pkt buf\n");
   214				break;
   215			}
   216	
   217			/* Deliver to monitoring devices all packets that we
   218			 * will transmit.
   219			 */
   220			virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt(pkt);
   221	
   222			vhost_add_used(vq, head, sizeof(pkt->hdr) + payload_len);
   223			added = true;
   224	
   225			pkt->off += payload_len;
   226			total_len += payload_len;
   227	
   228			/* If we didn't send all the payload we can requeue the packet
   229			 * to send it with the next available buffer.
   230			 */
   231			if (pkt->off < pkt->len) {
   232				pkt->hdr.flags |= cpu_to_le32(flags_to_restore);
   233	
   234				/* We are queueing the same virtio_vsock_pkt to handle
   235				 * the remaining bytes, and we want to deliver it
   236				 * to monitoring devices in the next iteration.
   237				 */
   238				pkt->tap_delivered = false;
   239	
   240				spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
   241				list_add(&pkt->list, &vsock->send_pkt_list);
   242				spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
   243			} else {
   244				if (pkt->reply) {
   245					int val;
   246	
   247					val = atomic_dec_return(&vsock->queued_replies);
   248	
   249					/* Do we have resources to resume tx
   250					 * processing?
   251					 */
   252					if (val + 1 == tx_vq->num)
   253						restart_tx = true;
   254				}
   255	
   256				virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
   257			}
   258		} while(likely(!vhost_exceeds_weight(vq, ++pkts, total_len)));
   259		if (added)
   260			vhost_signal(&vsock->dev, vq);
   261	
   262	out:
   263		mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
   264	
   265		if (restart_tx)
   266			vhost_poll_queue(&tx_vq->poll);
   267	}
   268	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 33807 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/6] vhost/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing
  2021-09-03  6:55   ` Stefano Garzarella
@ 2021-09-03 12:14     ` Stefano Garzarella
  2021-09-03 12:34       ` Arseny Krasnov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Garzarella @ 2021-09-03 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arseny Krasnov
  Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, Michael S. Tsirkin, Jason Wang, David S. Miller,
	Jakub Kicinski, Norbert Slusarek, Colin Ian King,
	Andra Paraschiv, kvm, virtualization, netdev, linux-kernel,
	stsp2, oxffffaa

On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 08:55:39AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 09:15:38AM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>>'MSG_EOR' handling has similar logic as 'MSG_EOM' - if bit present
>>in packet's header, reset it to 0. Then restore it back if packet
>>processing wasn't completed. Instead of bool variable for each
>>flag, bit mask variable was added: it has logical OR of 'MSG_EOR'
>>and 'MSG_EOM' if needed, to restore flags, this variable is ORed
>>with flags field of packet.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
>>---
>>drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
>>1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>>index feaf650affbe..93e8d635e18f 100644
>>--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>>+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>>@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
>>		size_t nbytes;
>>		size_t iov_len, payload_len;
>>		int head;
>>-		bool restore_flag = false;
>>+		u32 flags_to_restore = 0;
>>
>>		spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
>>		if (list_empty(&vsock->send_pkt_list)) {
>>@@ -179,15 +179,20 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
>>			 * created dynamically and are initialized with header
>>			 * of current packet(except length). But in case of
>>			 * SOCK_SEQPACKET, we also must clear message delimeter
>>-			 * bit(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM). Otherwise, instead of one
>>-			 * packet with delimeter(which marks end of message),
>>-			 * there will be sequence of packets with delimeter
>>-			 * bit set. After initialized header will be copied to
>>-			 * rx buffer, this bit will be restored.
>>+			 * bit (VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) and MSG_EOR bit
>>+			 * (VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR) if set. Otherwise,
>>+			 * there will be sequence of packets with these
>>+			 * bits set. After initialized header will be copied to
>>+			 * rx buffer, these required bits will be restored.
>>			 */
>>			if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
>>				pkt->hdr.flags &= ~cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM);
>>-				restore_flag = true;
>>+				flags_to_restore |= VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM;
>>+
>>+				if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)) {
                                                               ^
Ooops, le32_to_cpu() should close before bitwise and operator.
I missed this, but kernel test robot discovered :-)

>>+					pkt->hdr.flags &= ~cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR);
>>+					flags_to_restore |= VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR;
>>+				}
>>			}
>>		}
>>
>>@@ -224,8 +229,7 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
>>		 * to send it with the next available buffer.
>>		 */
>>		if (pkt->off < pkt->len) {
>>-			if (restore_flag)
>>-				pkt->hdr.flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM);
>>+			pkt->hdr.flags |= cpu_to_le32(flags_to_restore);
>>
>>			/* We are queueing the same virtio_vsock_pkt to handle
>>			 * the remaining bytes, and we want to deliver it
>>-- 2.25.1
>>
>
>Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>

NACK

Please resend fixing the issue.

Stefano


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/6] vhost/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing
  2021-09-03 12:14     ` Stefano Garzarella
@ 2021-09-03 12:34       ` Arseny Krasnov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Arseny Krasnov @ 2021-09-03 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefano Garzarella
  Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, Michael S. Tsirkin, Jason Wang, David S. Miller,
	Jakub Kicinski, Norbert Slusarek, Colin Ian King,
	Andra Paraschiv, kvm, virtualization, netdev, linux-kernel,
	stsp2, oxffffaa


On 03.09.2021 15:14, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 08:55:39AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 09:15:38AM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>>> 'MSG_EOR' handling has similar logic as 'MSG_EOM' - if bit present
>>> in packet's header, reset it to 0. Then restore it back if packet
>>> processing wasn't completed. Instead of bool variable for each
>>> flag, bit mask variable was added: it has logical OR of 'MSG_EOR'
>>> and 'MSG_EOM' if needed, to restore flags, this variable is ORed
>>> with flags field of packet.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>>> index feaf650affbe..93e8d635e18f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>>> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
>>> 		size_t nbytes;
>>> 		size_t iov_len, payload_len;
>>> 		int head;
>>> -		bool restore_flag = false;
>>> +		u32 flags_to_restore = 0;
>>>
>>> 		spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
>>> 		if (list_empty(&vsock->send_pkt_list)) {
>>> @@ -179,15 +179,20 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
>>> 			 * created dynamically and are initialized with header
>>> 			 * of current packet(except length). But in case of
>>> 			 * SOCK_SEQPACKET, we also must clear message delimeter
>>> -			 * bit(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM). Otherwise, instead of one
>>> -			 * packet with delimeter(which marks end of message),
>>> -			 * there will be sequence of packets with delimeter
>>> -			 * bit set. After initialized header will be copied to
>>> -			 * rx buffer, this bit will be restored.
>>> +			 * bit (VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) and MSG_EOR bit
>>> +			 * (VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR) if set. Otherwise,
>>> +			 * there will be sequence of packets with these
>>> +			 * bits set. After initialized header will be copied to
>>> +			 * rx buffer, these required bits will be restored.
>>> 			 */
>>> 			if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
>>> 				pkt->hdr.flags &= ~cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM);
>>> -				restore_flag = true;
>>> +				flags_to_restore |= VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM;
>>> +
>>> +				if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)) {
>                                                                ^
> Ooops, le32_to_cpu() should close before bitwise and operator.
> I missed this, but kernel test robot discovered :-)
Sorry ><
>
>>> +					pkt->hdr.flags &= ~cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR);
>>> +					flags_to_restore |= VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR;
>>> +				}
>>> 			}
>>> 		}
>>>
>>> @@ -224,8 +229,7 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
>>> 		 * to send it with the next available buffer.
>>> 		 */
>>> 		if (pkt->off < pkt->len) {
>>> -			if (restore_flag)
>>> -				pkt->hdr.flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM);
>>> +			pkt->hdr.flags |= cpu_to_le32(flags_to_restore);
>>>
>>> 			/* We are queueing the same virtio_vsock_pkt to handle
>>> 			 * the remaining bytes, and we want to deliver it
>>> -- 2.25.1
>>>
>> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> NACK
>
> Please resend fixing the issue.
Done, v5 is sent
>
> Stefano
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/6] virtio/vsock: add 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR' bit.
  2021-09-03  6:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/6] virtio/vsock: add 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR' bit Arseny Krasnov
@ 2021-09-05 15:50   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
  2021-09-05 15:52     ` Arseny Krasnov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2021-09-05 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arseny Krasnov
  Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, Stefano Garzarella, Jason Wang, David S. Miller,
	Jakub Kicinski, Norbert Slusarek, Andra Paraschiv,
	Colin Ian King, kvm, virtualization, netdev, linux-kernel, stsp2,
	oxffffaa

On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 09:15:20AM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
> This bit is used to handle POSIX MSG_EOR flag passed from
> userspace in 'send*()' system calls. It marks end of each
> record and is visible to receiver using 'recvmsg()' system
> call.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>

Spec patch for this?

> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> index 8485b004a5f8..64738838bee5 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ enum virtio_vsock_shutdown {
>  /* VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW flags values */
>  enum virtio_vsock_rw {
>  	VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM = 1,
> +	VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR = 2,
>  };
>  
>  #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_VSOCK_H */
> -- 
> 2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/6] virtio/vsock: add 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR' bit.
  2021-09-05 15:50   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2021-09-05 15:52     ` Arseny Krasnov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Arseny Krasnov @ 2021-09-05 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael S. Tsirkin
  Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, Stefano Garzarella, Jason Wang, David S. Miller,
	Jakub Kicinski, Norbert Slusarek, Andra Paraschiv,
	Colin Ian King, kvm, virtualization, netdev, linux-kernel, stsp2,
	oxffffaa


On 05.09.2021 18:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 09:15:20AM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>> This bit is used to handle POSIX MSG_EOR flag passed from
>> userspace in 'send*()' system calls. It marks end of each
>> record and is visible to receiver using 'recvmsg()' system
>> call.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> Spec patch for this?

Hello, here it is

https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202109/msg00008.html

>
>> ---
>>  include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h
>> index 8485b004a5f8..64738838bee5 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h
>> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ enum virtio_vsock_shutdown {
>>  /* VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW flags values */
>>  enum virtio_vsock_rw {
>>  	VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM = 1,
>> +	VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR = 2,
>>  };
>>  
>>  #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_VSOCK_H */
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-09-05 15:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-09-03  6:13 [PATCH net-next v4 0/6] virtio/vsock: introduce MSG_EOR flag for SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
2021-09-03  6:14 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/6] virtio/vsock: rename 'EOR' to 'EOM' bit Arseny Krasnov
2021-09-03  6:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/6] virtio/vsock: add 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR' bit Arseny Krasnov
2021-09-05 15:50   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-09-05 15:52     ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-09-03  6:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/6] vhost/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing Arseny Krasnov
2021-09-03  6:55   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-09-03 12:14     ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-09-03 12:34       ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-09-03 12:05   ` kernel test robot
2021-09-03  6:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/6] virtio/vsock: " Arseny Krasnov
2021-09-03  6:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/6] af_vsock: rename variables in receive loop Arseny Krasnov
2021-09-03  6:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 6/6] vsock_test: update message bounds test for MSG_EOR Arseny Krasnov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).