Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, jiri@nvidia.com,
amcohen@nvidia.com, danieller@nvidia.com, mlxsw@nvidia.com,
roopa@nvidia.com, andrew@lunn.ch, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
vivien.didelot@gmail.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, tariqt@nvidia.com,
ayal@nvidia.com, eranbe@nvidia.com, mkubecek@suse.cz,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] devlink: Add device metric support
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 20:43:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58a0356d-3e15-f805-ae52-dc44f265661d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200818172419.5b86801b@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
On 8/18/20 6:24 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:50:53 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote:
>> From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
>>
>> This patch set extends devlink to allow device drivers to expose device
>> metrics to user space in a standard and extensible fashion, as opposed
>> to the driver-specific debugfs approach.
>
> I feel like all those loose hardware interfaces are a huge maintenance
> burden. I don't know what the solution is, but the status quo is not
> great.
I don't agree with the 'loose' characterization. Ido and team are
pushing what is arguably a modern version of `ethtool -S`, so it
provides a better API for retrieving data.
>
> I spend way too much time patrolling ethtool -S outputs already.
>
But that's the nature of detailed stats which are often essential to
ensuring the system is operating as expected or debugging some problem.
Commonality is certainly desired in names when relevant to be able to
build tooling around the stats. As an example, per-queue stats have been
essential to me for recent investigations. ethq has been really helpful
in crossing NIC vendors and viewing those stats as it handles the
per-vendor naming differences, but it requires changes to show anything
else - errors per queue, xdp stats, drops, etc. This part could be simpler.
As for this set, I believe the metrics exposed here are more unique to
switch ASICs. At least one company I know of has built a business model
around exposing detailed telemetry of switch ASICs, so clearly some find
them quite valuable.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-19 2:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-17 12:50 Ido Schimmel
2020-08-17 12:50 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/6] devlink: Add device metric infrastructure Ido Schimmel
2020-08-17 14:12 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-08-17 12:50 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] netdevsim: Add devlink metric support Ido Schimmel
2020-08-17 12:50 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/6] selftests: netdevsim: Add devlink metric tests Ido Schimmel
2020-08-17 12:50 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/6] mlxsw: reg: Add Tunneling NVE Counters Register Ido Schimmel
2020-08-17 12:50 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 5/6] mlxsw: reg: Add Tunneling NVE Counters Register Version 2 Ido Schimmel
2020-08-17 12:50 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 6/6] mlxsw: spectrum_nve: Expose VXLAN counters via devlink-metric Ido Schimmel
2020-08-17 14:29 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-08-18 6:59 ` Ido Schimmel
2020-08-19 0:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] devlink: Add device metric support Jakub Kicinski
2020-08-19 2:43 ` David Ahern [this message]
2020-08-19 3:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-08-19 4:30 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-08-19 16:18 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-08-19 17:20 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-08-19 18:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-08-20 14:35 ` David Ahern
2020-08-20 16:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-08-21 10:30 ` Ido Schimmel
2020-08-21 16:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-08-21 19:12 ` David Ahern
2020-08-21 23:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-08-21 23:59 ` David Ahern
2020-08-22 0:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-08-22 1:18 ` David Ahern
2020-08-22 16:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-08-23 7:04 ` Ido Schimmel
2020-08-24 19:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58a0356d-3e15-f805-ae52-dc44f265661d@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=amcohen@nvidia.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ayal@nvidia.com \
--cc=danieller@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eranbe@nvidia.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=mlxsw@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
--subject='Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] devlink: Add device metric support' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).