Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, alexander.duyck@gmail.com,
brouer@redhat.com, echaudro@redhat.com,
magnus.karlsson@intel.com, tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com,
toke@redhat.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] net: xdp: add xdp_update_skb_shared_info utility routine
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 11:46:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60ec8dfeb42aa_50e1d20857@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16f4244f5a506143f5becde501f1ecb120255b42.1625828537.git.lorenzo@kernel.org>
Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> Introduce xdp_update_skb_shared_info routine to update frags array
> metadata from a given xdp_buffer/xdp_frame. We do not need to reset
> frags array since it is already initialized by the driver.
> Rely on xdp_update_skb_shared_info in mvneta driver.
Some more context here would really help. I had to jump into the mvneta
driver to see what is happening.
So as I read this we have a loop processing the descriptor in
mvneta_rx_swbm()
mvneta_rx_swbm()
while (rx_proc < budget && rx_proc < rx_todo) {
if (rx_status & MVNETA_RXD_FIRST_DESC) ...
else {
mvneta_swbm_add_rx_fragment()
}
..
if (!rx_status & MVNETA_RXD_LAST_DESC)
continue;
..
if (xdp_prog)
mvneta_run_xdp(...)
}
roughly looking like above. First question, do you ever hit
!MVNETA_RXD_LAST_DESC today? I assume this is avoided by hardware
setup when XDP is enabled, otherwise _run_xdp() would be
broken correct? Next question, given last descriptor bit
logic whats the condition to hit the code added in this patch?
wouldn't we need more than 1 descriptor and then we would
skip the xdp_run... sorry lost me and its probably easier
to let you give the flow vs spending an hour trying to
track it down.
But, in theory as you handle a hardware discriptor you can build
up a set of pages using them to create a single skb rather than a
skb per descriptor. But don't we know if pfmemalloc should be
done while we are building the frag list? Can't se just set it
vs this for loop in xdp_update_skb_shared_info(),
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_frags; i++) {
> + struct page *page = skb_frag_page(&sinfo->frags[i]);
> +
> + page = compound_head(page);
> + if (page_is_pfmemalloc(page)) {
> + skb->pfmemalloc = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +}
...
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> index 361bc4fbe20b..abf2e50880e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> @@ -2294,18 +2294,29 @@ mvneta_swbm_add_rx_fragment(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> rx_desc->buf_phys_addr = 0;
>
> if (data_len > 0 && xdp_sinfo->nr_frags < MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
> - skb_frag_t *frag = &xdp_sinfo->frags[xdp_sinfo->nr_frags++];
> + skb_frag_t *frag = &xdp_sinfo->frags[xdp_sinfo->nr_frags];
>
> skb_frag_off_set(frag, pp->rx_offset_correction);
> skb_frag_size_set(frag, data_len);
> __skb_frag_set_page(frag, page);
> + /* We don't need to reset pp_recycle here. It's already set, so
> + * just mark fragments for recycling.
> + */
> + page_pool_store_mem_info(page, rxq->page_pool);
> +
> + /* first fragment */
> + if (!xdp_sinfo->nr_frags)
> + xdp_sinfo->gso_type = *size;
Would be nice to also change 'int size' -> 'unsigned int size' so the
types matched. Presumably you really can't have a negative size.
Also how about giving gso_type a better name. xdp_sinfo->size maybe?
> + xdp_sinfo->nr_frags++;
>
> /* last fragment */
> if (len == *size) {
> struct skb_shared_info *sinfo;
>
> sinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(xdp);
> + sinfo->xdp_frags_tsize = xdp_sinfo->nr_frags * PAGE_SIZE;
> sinfo->nr_frags = xdp_sinfo->nr_frags;
> + sinfo->gso_type = xdp_sinfo->gso_type;
> memcpy(sinfo->frags, xdp_sinfo->frags,
> sinfo->nr_frags * sizeof(skb_frag_t));
> }
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-12 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-09 11:10 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Add " Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-07-09 11:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] net: skbuff: add xdp_frags_tsize field to skb_shared_info Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-07-09 11:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] net: xdp: add xdp_update_skb_shared_info utility routine Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-07-12 18:46 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2021-07-12 20:22 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-07-14 23:44 ` John Fastabend
2021-07-15 23:27 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-07-16 3:05 ` John Fastabend
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60ec8dfeb42aa_50e1d20857@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--subject='RE: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] net: xdp: add xdp_update_skb_shared_info utility routine' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).