Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>, <kuba@kernel.org> Cc: <brouer@redhat.com>, <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, <mw@semihalf.com>, <linuxarm@openeuler.org>, <yisen.zhuang@huawei.com>, <salil.mehta@huawei.com>, <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>, <hawk@kernel.org>, <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>, <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <john.fastabend@gmail.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <peterz@infradead.org>, <will@kernel.org>, <willy@infradead.org>, <vbabka@suse.cz>, <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, <guro@fb.com>, <peterx@redhat.com>, <feng.tang@intel.com>, <jgg@ziepe.ca>, <mcroce@microsoft.com>, <hughd@google.com>, <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>, <alobakin@pm.me>, <willemb@google.com>, <wenxu@ucloud.cn>, <cong.wang@bytedance.com>, <haokexin@gmail.com>, <nogikh@google.com>, <elver@google.com>, <yhs@fb.com>, <kpsingh@kernel.org>, <andrii@kernel.org>, <kafai@fb.com>, <songliubraving@fb.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <chenhao288@hisilicon.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] page_pool: add interface to manipulate frag count in page pool Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 08:48:55 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <6964895f-1bb8-00ef-acaa-7812367234cd@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <a3999ff2-2385-41a6-c3f5-ccd6cf67badf@redhat.com> On 2021/8/10 22:58, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > > On 06/08/2021 04.46, Yunsheng Lin wrote: >> For 32 bit systems with 64 bit dma, dma_addr[1] is used to >> store the upper 32 bit dma addr, those system should be rare >> those days. >> >> For normal system, the dma_addr[1] in 'struct page' is not >> used, so we can reuse dma_addr[1] for storing frag count, >> which means how many frags this page might be splited to. >> >> In order to simplify the page frag support in the page pool, >> the PAGE_POOL_DMA_USE_PP_FRAG_COUNT macro is added to indicate >> the 32 bit systems with 64 bit dma, and the page frag support >> in page pool is disabled for such system. >> >> The newly added page_pool_set_frag_count() is called to reserve >> the maximum frag count before any page frag is passed to the >> user. The page_pool_atomic_sub_frag_count_return() is called >> when user is done with the page frag. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> >> --- >> include/linux/mm_types.h | 18 +++++++++++++----- >> include/net/page_pool.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- >> net/core/page_pool.c | 4 ++++ >> 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h >> index 52bbd2b..7f8ee09 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h >> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h >> @@ -103,11 +103,19 @@ struct page { >> unsigned long pp_magic; >> struct page_pool *pp; >> unsigned long _pp_mapping_pad; >> - /** >> - * @dma_addr: might require a 64-bit value on >> - * 32-bit architectures. >> - */ >> - unsigned long dma_addr[2]; >> + unsigned long dma_addr; >> + union { >> + /** >> + * dma_addr_upper: might require a 64-bit >> + * value on 32-bit architectures. >> + */ >> + unsigned long dma_addr_upper; >> + /** >> + * For frag page support, not supported in >> + * 32-bit architectures with 64-bit DMA. >> + */ >> + atomic_long_t pp_frag_count; >> + }; >> }; >> struct { /* slab, slob and slub */ >> union { >> diff --git a/include/net/page_pool.h b/include/net/page_pool.h >> index 8d7744d..42e6997 100644 >> --- a/include/net/page_pool.h >> +++ b/include/net/page_pool.h >> @@ -45,7 +45,10 @@ >> * Please note DMA-sync-for-CPU is still >> * device driver responsibility >> */ >> -#define PP_FLAG_ALL (PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP | PP_FLAG_DMA_SYNC_DEV) >> +#define PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG BIT(2) /* for page frag feature */ >> +#define PP_FLAG_ALL (PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP |\ >> + PP_FLAG_DMA_SYNC_DEV |\ >> + PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG) >> /* >> * Fast allocation side cache array/stack >> @@ -198,19 +201,48 @@ static inline void page_pool_recycle_direct(struct page_pool *pool, >> page_pool_put_full_page(pool, page, true); >> } >> +#define PAGE_POOL_DMA_USE_PP_FRAG_COUNT \ >> + (sizeof(dma_addr_t) > sizeof(unsigned long)) >> + >> static inline dma_addr_t page_pool_get_dma_addr(struct page *page) >> { >> - dma_addr_t ret = page->dma_addr[0]; >> - if (sizeof(dma_addr_t) > sizeof(unsigned long)) >> - ret |= (dma_addr_t)page->dma_addr[1] << 16 << 16; >> + dma_addr_t ret = page->dma_addr; >> + >> + if (PAGE_POOL_DMA_USE_PP_FRAG_COUNT) >> + ret |= (dma_addr_t)page->dma_addr_upper << 16 << 16; > > I find the macro name confusing. > > I think it would be easier to read the code, if it was called: > PAGE_POOL_DMA_CANNOT_USE_PP_FRAG_COUNT Actually, there is a *DMA* in tha above macro, which means DMA addr uses the PP_FRAG_COUNT field. Perhaps PAGE_POOL_DMA_ADDR_UPPER_USE_PP_FRAG_COUNT is more obvious here? > >> + >> return ret; >> } >> static inline void page_pool_set_dma_addr(struct page *page, dma_addr_t addr) >> { >> - page->dma_addr[0] = addr; >> - if (sizeof(dma_addr_t) > sizeof(unsigned long)) >> - page->dma_addr[1] = upper_32_bits(addr); >> + page->dma_addr = addr; >> + if (PAGE_POOL_DMA_USE_PP_FRAG_COUNT) >> + page->dma_addr_upper = upper_32_bits(addr); >> +} >> + >> +static inline void page_pool_set_frag_count(struct page *page, long nr) >> +{ >> + atomic_long_set(&page->pp_frag_count, nr); >> +} >> + >> +static inline long page_pool_atomic_sub_frag_count_return(struct page *page, >> + long nr) >> +{ >> + long ret; >> + >> + /* As suggested by Alexander, atomic_long_read() may cover up the >> + * reference count errors, so avoid calling atomic_long_read() in >> + * the cases of freeing or draining the page_frags, where we would >> + * not expect it to match or that are slowpath anyway. >> + */ >> + if (__builtin_constant_p(nr) && >> + atomic_long_read(&page->pp_frag_count) == nr) >> + return 0; >> + >> + ret = atomic_long_sub_return(nr, &page->pp_frag_count); >> + WARN_ON(ret < 0); >> + return ret; >> } >> static inline bool is_page_pool_compiled_in(void) >> diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c >> index 78838c6..68fab94 100644 >> --- a/net/core/page_pool.c >> +++ b/net/core/page_pool.c >> @@ -67,6 +67,10 @@ static int page_pool_init(struct page_pool *pool, >> */ >> } >> + if (PAGE_POOL_DMA_USE_PP_FRAG_COUNT && >> + pool->p.flags & PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG) >> + return -EINVAL; > > I read this as: if the page_pool use pp_frag_count and have flag set, then it is invalid/no-allowed, which seems wrong. > > I find this code more intuitive to read: > > + if (PAGE_POOL_DMA_CANNOT_USE_PP_FRAG_COUNT && > + pool->p.flags & PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG) > + return -EINVAL; > > --Jesper > > . >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-11 0:49 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-08-06 2:46 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] add frag page support in page pool Yunsheng Lin 2021-08-06 2:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] page_pool: keep pp info as long as page pool owns the page Yunsheng Lin 2021-08-06 2:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] page_pool: add interface to manipulate frag count in page pool Yunsheng Lin 2021-08-10 14:58 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-08-11 0:48 ` Yunsheng Lin [this message] 2021-08-12 15:17 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-08-06 2:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] page_pool: add frag page recycling support " Yunsheng Lin 2021-08-06 2:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net: hns3: support skb's frag page recycling based on " Yunsheng Lin 2021-09-08 8:31 ` moyufeng 2021-09-08 15:08 ` Jakub Kicinski 2021-09-08 15:26 ` Ilias Apalodimas 2021-09-08 15:57 ` Jakub Kicinski 2021-09-08 16:47 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-09-08 16:51 ` Ilias Apalodimas 2022-01-26 14:30 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2022-01-28 4:00 ` Yunsheng Lin 2022-01-28 9:21 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2022-01-29 8:44 ` Yunsheng Lin 2022-02-03 9:48 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2022-02-07 2:54 ` Yunsheng Lin 2022-03-24 18:09 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2021-08-10 14:01 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] add frag page support in " Jakub Kicinski 2021-08-10 14:23 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2021-08-10 14:43 ` Jakub Kicinski 2021-08-10 15:09 ` Alexander Duyck 2021-08-11 1:06 ` [Linuxarm] " Yunsheng Lin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=6964895f-1bb8-00ef-acaa-7812367234cd@huawei.com \ --to=linyunsheng@huawei.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \ --cc=alobakin@pm.me \ --cc=andrii@kernel.org \ --cc=ast@kernel.org \ --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=brouer@redhat.com \ --cc=chenhao288@hisilicon.com \ --cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \ --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=elver@google.com \ --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \ --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \ --cc=guro@fb.com \ --cc=haokexin@gmail.com \ --cc=hawk@kernel.org \ --cc=hughd@google.com \ --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \ --cc=jbrouer@redhat.com \ --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \ --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \ --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \ --cc=kafai@fb.com \ --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \ --cc=kuba@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \ --cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \ --cc=mcroce@microsoft.com \ --cc=mw@semihalf.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=nogikh@google.com \ --cc=peterx@redhat.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \ --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \ --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \ --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \ --cc=wenxu@ucloud.cn \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ --cc=willemb@google.com \ --cc=willy@infradead.org \ --cc=yhs@fb.com \ --cc=yisen.zhuang@huawei.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).