Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
	Numan Siddique <nusiddiq@redhat.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>,
	Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>,
	Lourdes Pedrajas <lu@pplo.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] ipv4: route: Ignore output interface in FIB lookup for PMTU route
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:54:36 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <702d24b9-0186-15bb-b6dc-c4ec5118d446@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ec94f1f590e6cb57d128ce10e4306e589544944d.1596520062.git.sbrivio@redhat.com>

On 8/3/20 11:53 PM, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> Currently, processes sending traffic to a local bridge with an
> encapsulation device as a port don't get ICMP errors if they exceed
> the PMTU of the encapsulated link.
> 
> David Ahern suggested this as a hack, but it actually looks like
> the correct solution: when we update the PMTU for a given destination
> by means of updating or creating a route exception, the encapsulation
> might trigger this because of PMTU discovery happening either on the
> encapsulation device itself, or its lower layer. This happens on
> bridged encapsulations only.
> 
> The output interface shouldn't matter, because we already have a
> valid destination. Drop the output interface restriction from the
> associated route lookup.
> 
> For UDP tunnels, we will now have a route exception created for the
> encapsulation itself, with a MTU value reflecting its headroom, which
> allows a bridge forwarding IP packets originated locally to deliver
> errors back to the sending socket.
> 
> The behaviour is now consistent with IPv6 and verified with selftests
> pmtu_ipv{4,6}_br_{geneve,vxlan}{4,6}_exception introduced later in
> this series.
> 
> v2:
> - reset output interface only for bridge ports (David Ahern)
> - add and use netif_is_any_bridge_port() helper (David Ahern)
> 
> Suggested-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/netdevice.h | 5 +++++
>  net/ipv4/route.c          | 5 +++++
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 

Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>



  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-04 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-04  5:53 [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] Support PMTU discovery with bridged UDP tunnels Stefano Brivio
2020-08-04  5:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] ipv4: route: Ignore output interface in FIB lookup for PMTU route Stefano Brivio
2020-08-04 13:54   ` David Ahern [this message]
2020-08-04  5:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] tunnels: PMTU discovery support for directly bridged IP packets Stefano Brivio
2020-08-04 13:54   ` David Ahern
2020-08-05 16:54   ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-08-05 17:02     ` Stefano Brivio
2020-08-04  5:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] vxlan: Support for PMTU discovery on directly bridged links Stefano Brivio
2020-08-04  5:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] geneve: " Stefano Brivio
2020-08-04  5:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] selftests: pmtu.sh: Add tests for bridged UDP tunnels Stefano Brivio
2020-08-04 14:00   ` David Ahern
2020-08-04 14:35     ` Stefano Brivio
2020-08-04  5:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] selftests: pmtu.sh: Add tests for UDP tunnels handled by Open vSwitch Stefano Brivio
2020-08-04 20:02 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] Support PMTU discovery with bridged UDP tunnels David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=702d24b9-0186-15bb-b6dc-c4ec5118d446@gmail.com \
    --to=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lu@pplo.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=nusiddiq@redhat.com \
    --cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
    --cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] ipv4: route: Ignore output interface in FIB lookup for PMTU route' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).