Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ath9k_htc: Add a missing spin_lock_init()
@ 2021-07-27 21:43 Rajat Asthana
  2021-07-28  7:11 ` Kalle Valo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rajat Asthana @ 2021-07-27 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ath9k-devel, kvalo, davem, kuba, linux-wireless, netdev, linux-kernel
  Cc: Rajat Asthana

Syzkaller reported a lockdep warning on non-initialized spinlock:

INFO: trying to register non-static key.
The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe
you didn't initialize this object before use?
turning off the locking correctness validator.
CPU: 0 PID: 10 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc4-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x143/0x1db lib/dump_stack.c:120
 assign_lock_key kernel/locking/lockdep.c:937 [inline]
 register_lock_class+0x1077/0x1180 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1249
 __lock_acquire+0x102/0x5230 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4781
 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5512 [inline]
 lock_acquire+0x19d/0x700 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5477
 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:135 [inline]
 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:175
 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:359 [inline]
 ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet+0x231/0x3f0 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c:172
 tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0x201/0x2e0 kernel/softirq.c:784
 __do_softirq+0x1b0/0x944 kernel/softirq.c:559
 run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:921 [inline]
 run_ksoftirqd+0x21/0x50 kernel/softirq.c:913
 smpboot_thread_fn+0x3ec/0x870 kernel/smpboot.c:165
 kthread+0x38c/0x460 kernel/kthread.c:313
 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294

We missed a spin_lock_init() in ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet() when the wmi
event is WMI_TXSTATUS_EVENTID. Placing this init here instead of
ath9k_init_wmi() is fine mainly because we need this spinlock when the
event is WMI_TXSTATUS_EVENTID and hence it should be initialized when it
is needed.

Signed-off-by: Rajat Asthana <rajatasthana4@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c
index fe29ad4b9023..446b7ca459df 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c
@@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ void ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
 					     &wmi->drv_priv->fatal_work);
 			break;
 		case WMI_TXSTATUS_EVENTID:
+			spin_lock_init(&priv->tx.tx_lock);
 			spin_lock_bh(&priv->tx.tx_lock);
 			if (priv->tx.flags & ATH9K_HTC_OP_TX_DRAIN) {
 				spin_unlock_bh(&priv->tx.tx_lock);
-- 
2.32.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ath9k_htc: Add a missing spin_lock_init()
  2021-07-27 21:43 [PATCH] ath9k_htc: Add a missing spin_lock_init() Rajat Asthana
@ 2021-07-28  7:11 ` Kalle Valo
  2021-07-28 19:02   ` Rajat Asthana
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2021-07-28  7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rajat Asthana
  Cc: ath9k-devel, davem, kuba, linux-wireless, netdev, linux-kernel

Rajat Asthana <rajatasthana4@gmail.com> writes:

> Syzkaller reported a lockdep warning on non-initialized spinlock:
>
> INFO: trying to register non-static key.
> The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe
> you didn't initialize this object before use?
> turning off the locking correctness validator.
> CPU: 0 PID: 10 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc4-syzkaller #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
> Call Trace:
>  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
>  dump_stack+0x143/0x1db lib/dump_stack.c:120
>  assign_lock_key kernel/locking/lockdep.c:937 [inline]
>  register_lock_class+0x1077/0x1180 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1249
>  __lock_acquire+0x102/0x5230 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4781
>  lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5512 [inline]
>  lock_acquire+0x19d/0x700 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5477
>  __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:135 [inline]
>  _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:175
>  spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:359 [inline]
>  ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet+0x231/0x3f0 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c:172
>  tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0x201/0x2e0 kernel/softirq.c:784
>  __do_softirq+0x1b0/0x944 kernel/softirq.c:559
>  run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:921 [inline]
>  run_ksoftirqd+0x21/0x50 kernel/softirq.c:913
>  smpboot_thread_fn+0x3ec/0x870 kernel/smpboot.c:165
>  kthread+0x38c/0x460 kernel/kthread.c:313
>  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294
>
> We missed a spin_lock_init() in ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet() when the wmi
> event is WMI_TXSTATUS_EVENTID. Placing this init here instead of
> ath9k_init_wmi() is fine mainly because we need this spinlock when the
> event is WMI_TXSTATUS_EVENTID and hence it should be initialized when it
> is needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajat Asthana <rajatasthana4@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c
> index fe29ad4b9023..446b7ca459df 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c
> @@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ void ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
>  					     &wmi->drv_priv->fatal_work);
>  			break;
>  		case WMI_TXSTATUS_EVENTID:
> +			spin_lock_init(&priv->tx.tx_lock);
>  			spin_lock_bh(&priv->tx.tx_lock);
>  			if (priv->tx.flags & ATH9K_HTC_OP_TX_DRAIN) {
>  				spin_unlock_bh(&priv->tx.tx_lock);

This is not making sense to me. You need to elaborate in the commit log
a lot more why this is "fine". For example, what happens when there are
multiple WMI_TXSTATUS_EVENTID events?

Did you test this on a real device?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ath9k_htc: Add a missing spin_lock_init()
  2021-07-28  7:11 ` Kalle Valo
@ 2021-07-28 19:02   ` Rajat Asthana
  2021-07-28 19:25     ` [PATCH v2] " Rajat Asthana
  2021-07-29  7:40     ` [PATCH] " Kalle Valo
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rajat Asthana @ 2021-07-28 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kalle Valo; +Cc: ath9k-devel, davem, kuba, linux-wireless, netdev, linux-kernel



On 28/07/21 12:41 pm, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Rajat Asthana <rajatasthana4@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> Syzkaller reported a lockdep warning on non-initialized spinlock:
>>
>> INFO: trying to register non-static key.
>> The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe
>> you didn't initialize this object before use?
>> turning off the locking correctness validator.
>> CPU: 0 PID: 10 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc4-syzkaller #0
>> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
>> Call Trace:
>>   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
>>   dump_stack+0x143/0x1db lib/dump_stack.c:120
>>   assign_lock_key kernel/locking/lockdep.c:937 [inline]
>>   register_lock_class+0x1077/0x1180 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1249
>>   __lock_acquire+0x102/0x5230 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4781
>>   lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5512 [inline]
>>   lock_acquire+0x19d/0x700 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5477
>>   __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:135 [inline]
>>   _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:175
>>   spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:359 [inline]
>>   ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet+0x231/0x3f0 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c:172
>>   tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0x201/0x2e0 kernel/softirq.c:784
>>   __do_softirq+0x1b0/0x944 kernel/softirq.c:559
>>   run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:921 [inline]
>>   run_ksoftirqd+0x21/0x50 kernel/softirq.c:913
>>   smpboot_thread_fn+0x3ec/0x870 kernel/smpboot.c:165
>>   kthread+0x38c/0x460 kernel/kthread.c:313
>>   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294
>>
>> We missed a spin_lock_init() in ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet() when the wmi
>> event is WMI_TXSTATUS_EVENTID. Placing this init here instead of
>> ath9k_init_wmi() is fine mainly because we need this spinlock when the
>> event is WMI_TXSTATUS_EVENTID and hence it should be initialized when it
>> is needed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rajat Asthana <rajatasthana4@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c
>> index fe29ad4b9023..446b7ca459df 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c
>> @@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ void ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
>>   					     &wmi->drv_priv->fatal_work);
>>   			break;
>>   		case WMI_TXSTATUS_EVENTID:
>> +			spin_lock_init(&priv->tx.tx_lock);
>>   			spin_lock_bh(&priv->tx.tx_lock);
>>   			if (priv->tx.flags & ATH9K_HTC_OP_TX_DRAIN) {
>>   				spin_unlock_bh(&priv->tx.tx_lock);
> 
> This is not making sense to me. You need to elaborate in the commit log
> a lot more why this is "fine". For example, what happens when there are
> multiple WMI_TXSTATUS_EVENTID events?
> 
Thanks for the review!
Now that you mentioned the case when there are multiple 
WMI_TXSTATUS_EVENTID events, this doesn't make sense, as that will cause 
a race condition. This instead should be done in ath9k_init_wmi(). I 
will make this change in the v2 patch.

> Did you test this on a real device?
> 
No, I didn't test this on a real device. Syzkaller has a reproducer for 
this and I just relied on the fact that the reproducer did not reproduce 
the warning with this patch.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] ath9k_htc: Add a missing spin_lock_init()
  2021-07-28 19:02   ` Rajat Asthana
@ 2021-07-28 19:25     ` Rajat Asthana
  2021-07-29  7:41       ` Kalle Valo
  2021-07-29  7:40     ` [PATCH] " Kalle Valo
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rajat Asthana @ 2021-07-28 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ath9k-devel, kvalo, davem, kuba, linux-wireless, netdev, linux-kernel
  Cc: Rajat Asthana

Syzkaller reported a lockdep warning on non-initialized spinlock:

INFO: trying to register non-static key.
The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe
you didn't initialize this object before use?
turning off the locking correctness validator.
CPU: 0 PID: 10 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc4-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x143/0x1db lib/dump_stack.c:120
 assign_lock_key kernel/locking/lockdep.c:937 [inline]
 register_lock_class+0x1077/0x1180 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1249
 __lock_acquire+0x102/0x5230 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4781
 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5512 [inline]
 lock_acquire+0x19d/0x700 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5477
 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:135 [inline]
 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:175
 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:359 [inline]
 ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet+0x231/0x3f0 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c:172
 tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0x201/0x2e0 kernel/softirq.c:784
 __do_softirq+0x1b0/0x944 kernel/softirq.c:559
 run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:921 [inline]
 run_ksoftirqd+0x21/0x50 kernel/softirq.c:913
 smpboot_thread_fn+0x3ec/0x870 kernel/smpboot.c:165
 kthread+0x38c/0x460 kernel/kthread.c:313
 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294

We missed a spin_lock_init() in ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet() when the wmi
event is WMI_TXSTATUS_EVENTID. So, add a spin_lock_init() in
ath9k_init_wmi().

Signed-off-by: Rajat Asthana <rajatasthana4@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c
index fe29ad4b9023..480de2170816 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct wmi *ath9k_init_wmi(struct ath9k_htc_priv *priv)
 	skb_queue_head_init(&wmi->wmi_event_queue);
 	spin_lock_init(&wmi->wmi_lock);
 	spin_lock_init(&wmi->event_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&wmi->drv_priv->tx.tx_lock);
 	mutex_init(&wmi->op_mutex);
 	mutex_init(&wmi->multi_write_mutex);
 	mutex_init(&wmi->multi_rmw_mutex);
-- 
2.32.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ath9k_htc: Add a missing spin_lock_init()
  2021-07-28 19:02   ` Rajat Asthana
  2021-07-28 19:25     ` [PATCH v2] " Rajat Asthana
@ 2021-07-29  7:40     ` Kalle Valo
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2021-07-29  7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rajat Asthana
  Cc: ath9k-devel, davem, kuba, linux-wireless, netdev, linux-kernel

Rajat Asthana <rajatasthana4@gmail.com> writes:

>> Did you test this on a real device?
>
> No, I didn't test this on a real device. Syzkaller has a reproducer
> for this and I just relied on the fact that the reproducer did not
> reproduce the warning with this patch.

This is exactly what worries me with syzbot patches. People just try to
silence the warning and not thinking how it works on a real device.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] ath9k_htc: Add a missing spin_lock_init()
  2021-07-28 19:25     ` [PATCH v2] " Rajat Asthana
@ 2021-07-29  7:41       ` Kalle Valo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2021-07-29  7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rajat Asthana
  Cc: ath9k-devel, davem, kuba, linux-wireless, netdev, linux-kernel

Rajat Asthana <rajatasthana4@gmail.com> writes:

> Syzkaller reported a lockdep warning on non-initialized spinlock:
>
> INFO: trying to register non-static key.
> The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe
> you didn't initialize this object before use?
> turning off the locking correctness validator.
> CPU: 0 PID: 10 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc4-syzkaller #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
> Call Trace:
>  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
>  dump_stack+0x143/0x1db lib/dump_stack.c:120
>  assign_lock_key kernel/locking/lockdep.c:937 [inline]
>  register_lock_class+0x1077/0x1180 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1249
>  __lock_acquire+0x102/0x5230 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4781
>  lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5512 [inline]
>  lock_acquire+0x19d/0x700 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5477
>  __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:135 [inline]
>  _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:175
>  spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:359 [inline]
>  ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet+0x231/0x3f0 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c:172
>  tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0x201/0x2e0 kernel/softirq.c:784
>  __do_softirq+0x1b0/0x944 kernel/softirq.c:559
>  run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:921 [inline]
>  run_ksoftirqd+0x21/0x50 kernel/softirq.c:913
>  smpboot_thread_fn+0x3ec/0x870 kernel/smpboot.c:165
>  kthread+0x38c/0x460 kernel/kthread.c:313
>  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294
>
> We missed a spin_lock_init() in ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet() when the wmi
> event is WMI_TXSTATUS_EVENTID. So, add a spin_lock_init() in
> ath9k_init_wmi().
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajat Asthana <rajatasthana4@gmail.com>

I assume this version is also not tested on a real device. Can someone
review and/or test this, please?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-07-29  7:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-07-27 21:43 [PATCH] ath9k_htc: Add a missing spin_lock_init() Rajat Asthana
2021-07-28  7:11 ` Kalle Valo
2021-07-28 19:02   ` Rajat Asthana
2021-07-28 19:25     ` [PATCH v2] " Rajat Asthana
2021-07-29  7:41       ` Kalle Valo
2021-07-29  7:40     ` [PATCH] " Kalle Valo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).