From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D164C433EF for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 21:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240735AbiAJVPr (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:15:47 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44450 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240441AbiAJVPq (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:15:46 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x733.google.com (mail-qk1-x733.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::733]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0E38C06173F for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:15:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk1-x733.google.com with SMTP id m2so16806956qkd.8 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:15:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tdZh+l9wm6XSStX2jchA6Q0jinu9DwwUz5sMLzDkQnQ=; b=av/0ts1Sm/iMx2BsRXz22bG2oqg7zRKHHksDN8WOaZ1P+tNq4+K/XknD9NrTjb8KPj YD9Ussv2PNJTXh1DOPbC1LODAMw4k2Cf/oAhpV4zn7Ym/0IfpK3P1N+lcbZAw5Uvjyfg AFHoIveswVyuk424iVUYbHYTQhmoD/yShUJ5Y= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tdZh+l9wm6XSStX2jchA6Q0jinu9DwwUz5sMLzDkQnQ=; b=DWPDqCl5/qRwMMQVkwJ/4v7AljBCE6PtmD/bJ4MbYjoC7GY7uBcsOPlpxz5NpX6QWp 7s1x2tO1q0ia+JQUzOfFk1/To18K/SIkuD3Y5WRzZEEAUJYujDVccXZqjVKlFTZjgnQJ MD94heMyWuw6oss6MeVcp259KONasEhGDxoGgptw+Vw1CZXGZMMf8ZTwhedNBcKYotXY S5HzZsvO1ny6c3av+Ye5wgpkXL2ARMtKlAVqpRtLBPX4erlDeQHgt1KbnV+sgGXOYUxS JVclDoNi08YgT5Upqm0j7FZ4X3Kyuj/IoJyamOJWGxfn4v9NduER+1qDzw2Pj8xhEbRz WP6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530IWYjwFW55rKfhG3rLDTaNVl9N26j9Jydewd2iIvFQ0In6VOtw ajapgKjEtbUkV8TafVnN3wORNHoT+kSywqMGJNr/Z96kmC5dcg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyU55Jsrb8L7JBswHv0HnHBAMsYzQ7f5AzPGH7tjEQsVwgz5769fJ9LaWkypLSm05MlQc1g/KybaY+UjFGNIwo= X-Received: by 2002:a37:6411:: with SMTP id y17mr1223491qkb.250.1641849344893; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:15:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Michael Chan Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:15:34 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bnxt] Error: Unable to read VPD To: Vijay Balakrishna Cc: Netdev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 1:02 PM Vijay Balakrishna wrote: > > > Since moving to 5.10 from 5.4 we are seeing > > > Jan 01 00:00:01 localhost kernel: bnxt_en 0008:01:00.0 (unnamed net_device) (uninitialized): Unable to read VPD > > > > Jan 01 00:00:01 localhost kernel: bnxt_en 0008:01:00.1 (unnamed net_device) (uninitialized): Unable to read VPD > > these appear to be harmless and introduced by > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a0d0fd70fed5cc4f1e2dd98b801be63b07b4d6ac > Does "Unable to read VPD" need to be an error or can it be a warning > (netdev_warn)? > We can change these to warnings. Thanks.