Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
To: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	illusionist.neo@gmail.com, zlim.lnx@gmail.com,
	Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org>,
	naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com, sandipan@linux.ibm.com,
	Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>,
	bjorn@kernel.org, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, udknight@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/7] s390: bpf: Fix off-by-one in tail call count limiting
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 23:09:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM1=_QSZhtvgpECnhpMwkdrfjV3UTMKTtRBnty58nM+Zgw2=Ug@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f97353921497b8d603cd5fff05e136d4bfcb430.camel@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 2:24 PM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2021-08-09 at 11:34 +0200, Johan Almbladh wrote:
> > Before, the eBPF JIT allowed up to MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1 tail calls.
> > Now, precisely MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT is allowed, which is in line with the
> > behaviour of the interpreter. Verified with the test_bpf test suite
> > on qemu-system-s390x.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> > b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> > index 88419263a89a..f6cdf13285ed 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> > @@ -1363,7 +1363,7 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit
> > *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp,
> >                                  jit->prg);
> >
> >                 /*
> > -                * if (tail_call_cnt++ > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
> > +                * if (tail_call_cnt++ >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
> >                  *         goto out;
> >                  */
> >
> > @@ -1377,8 +1377,8 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit
> > *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp,
> >                 EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xeb000000, 0x00fa, REG_W1, REG_W0,
> > REG_15, off);
> >                 /* clij %w1,MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT,0x2,out */
>
> This comment needs to be updated as well.
>
> >                 patch_2_clij = jit->prg;
> > -               EMIT6_PCREL_RIEC(0xec000000, 0x007f, REG_W1,
> > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT,
> > -                                2, jit->prg);
> > +               EMIT6_PCREL_RIEC(0xec000000, 0x007f, REG_W1,
> > +                                MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT - 1, 2, jit->prg);
> >
> >                 /*
> >                  * prog = array->ptrs[index];
>
> With that:
>
> Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
>

Fixing it. Thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-09 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-09  9:34 [PATCH bpf-next 0/7] Fix MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT handling in eBPF JITs Johan Almbladh
2021-08-09  9:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/7] arm: bpf: Fix off-by-one in tail call count limiting Johan Almbladh
2021-08-09  9:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/7] arm64: " Johan Almbladh
2021-08-09  9:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/7] powerpc: " Johan Almbladh
2021-08-09  9:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/7] s390: " Johan Almbladh
2021-08-09 12:24   ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-08-09 21:09     ` Johan Almbladh [this message]
2021-08-09  9:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/7] sparc: " Johan Almbladh
2021-08-09  9:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/7] mips: " Johan Almbladh
2021-08-09  9:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/7] x86: bpf: Fix comments on " Johan Almbladh
2021-08-09 15:41   ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-08-09 18:02     ` Johan Almbladh
2021-08-12 16:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/7] Fix MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT handling in eBPF JITs Paul Chaignon
2021-08-16  7:17   ` Johan Almbladh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAM1=_QSZhtvgpECnhpMwkdrfjV3UTMKTtRBnty58nM+Zgw2=Ug@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=illusionist.neo@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=luke.r.nels@gmail.com \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulburton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sandipan@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=udknight@gmail.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=zlim.lnx@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).