Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hovold <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Dongliang Mu <email@example.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
"David S. Miller" <email@example.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Oliver Neukum <email@example.com>,
Anirudh Rayabharam <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Dan Carpenter <email@example.com>,
Rustam Kovhaev <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Zheng Yongjun <email@example.com>,
Emil Renner Berthing <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <email@example.com>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] usb: hso: fix error handling code of hso_create_net_device
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 09:23:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPkc+HNUPcXQglpG@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 01:32:48PM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 12:42 AM Johan Hovold <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > A version of this patch has already been applied to net-next.
> > That was apparently net (not net-next).
> > > No idea which version that was or why the second patch hasn't been
> > > applied yet.
> It seems because I only sent the 1/2 patch in the v3. Also due to
> this, gregkh asked me to resend the whole patchset again.
Yeah, it's hard to keep track of submissions sometimes, especially if
not updating the whole series.
> > > Dongliang, if you're resending something here it should first be rebased
> > > on linux-next (net-next).
> > And the resend of v3 of both patches has now also been applied to
> > net-next.
> > Hopefully there are no conflicts between v2 and v3 but we'll see soon.
> You mean you apply a v2 patch into one tree? This thread already
> contains the v3 patch, and there is no v2 patch in the mailing list
> due to one incomplete email subject.
> BTW, v2->v3 only some label change due to naming style.
Ok, I can't keep track of this either. I just noticed that this patch
shows up in both net (for 5.14):
and net-next (for 5.15):
The net one was applied on the 15th and the net-next one yesterday.
Judging from a quick look it appears to be the same diff so no damage
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-22 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-14 9:13 Dongliang Mu
2021-07-21 7:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-07-21 8:17 ` Dongliang Mu
2021-07-21 14:34 ` Johan Hovold
2021-07-21 16:42 ` Johan Hovold
2021-07-22 5:32 ` Dongliang Mu
2021-07-22 7:23 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2021-07-22 7:51 ` Dongliang Mu
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] usb: hso: fix error handling code of hso_create_net_device' \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).