From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3738C4338F for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8338361058 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232269AbhHKVj1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:39:27 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:36487 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232013AbhHKVj0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:39:26 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EE45C00B0; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:39:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:39:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=46gsBV 2j973bcXk58Yhoh6T8qA9awpQNF3grGouu5fs=; b=LEmXRq4gE48Ra1Yw4mS0b+ ojXjF41Nyu1tPJnG8hqPyeJSjrGWhaUF3OjcuayiuVQwCWqV6AHjdQUEOl7UBWwq qolJ6xWMywEog1bPksUMXYytedDbqaMmeCftEe2SG9s23h1uDopwzeXxa/ffgiT1 wTkC0OKgzH1Dk0vyow3X/e362EpdXBklTd4/bak1a9lI1EefSc0D3IYg0+3HhTjV 9QBd2k926dKN4soU1kOiuaQBXgK5chdgojk+Xni/vcePpHc/xW63+qQe+ZNCU8zM nAeJC9gepPlNFiQmgfVycjguV9xBXxvn4wQtygQ8AmE6lE4OtcUOnvd2xAQ7lHfQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrkedugdduiedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdortddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefkughoucfu tghhihhmmhgvlhcuoehiughoshgthhesihguohhstghhrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpefgjeevhfdvgeeiudekteduveegueejfefffeefteekkeeuueehjeduledtjeeu udenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehiug hoshgthhesihguohhstghhrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:39:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:38:56 +0300 From: Ido Schimmel To: DENG Qingfang Cc: Roopa Prabhu , Nikolay Aleksandrov , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , "moderated list:ETHERNET BRIDGE" , "open list:ETHERNET BRIDGE" , open list , Florian Fainelli , Vladimir Oltean Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: bridge: switchdev: allow port isolation to be offloaded Message-ID: References: <20210811135247.1703496-1-dqfext@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210811135247.1703496-1-dqfext@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 09:52:46PM +0800, DENG Qingfang wrote: > Add BR_ISOLATED flag to BR_PORT_FLAGS_HW_OFFLOAD, to allow switchdev > drivers to offload port isolation. > > Suggested-by: Vladimir Oltean > Signed-off-by: DENG Qingfang > --- > net/bridge/br_switchdev.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c > index 6bf518d78f02..898257153883 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c > +++ b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c > @@ -71,7 +71,8 @@ bool nbp_switchdev_allowed_egress(const struct net_bridge_port *p, > > /* Flags that can be offloaded to hardware */ > #define BR_PORT_FLAGS_HW_OFFLOAD (BR_LEARNING | BR_FLOOD | \ > - BR_MCAST_FLOOD | BR_BCAST_FLOOD) > + BR_MCAST_FLOOD | BR_BCAST_FLOOD | \ > + BR_ISOLATED) Why add it now and not as part of a patchset that actually makes use of the flag in a driver that offloads port isolation? > > int br_switchdev_set_port_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, > unsigned long flags, > -- > 2.25.1 >