Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	"David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Network Developers" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sch_generic: aviod concurrent reset and enqueue op for lockless qdisc
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 10:22:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0543793-11fa-6ef1-f8ea-6a724ab2de8f@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM_iQpWbZdh5-UGBi6PM19EBgV+Bq7vmifgJPdak6X=R9yztnw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2020/9/3 9:48, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:22 PM Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2020/9/3 8:35, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 11:35 PM Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2020/9/2 12:41, Cong Wang wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 6:42 PM Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2020/9/2 2:24, Cong Wang wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 5:59 PM Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Currently there is concurrent reset and enqueue operation for the
>>>>>>>> same lockless qdisc when there is no lock to synchronize the
>>>>>>>> q->enqueue() in __dev_xmit_skb() with the qdisc reset operation in
>>>>>>>> qdisc_deactivate() called by dev_deactivate_queue(), which may cause
>>>>>>>> out-of-bounds access for priv->ring[] in hns3 driver if user has
>>>>>>>> requested a smaller queue num when __dev_xmit_skb() still enqueue a
>>>>>>>> skb with a larger queue_mapping after the corresponding qdisc is
>>>>>>>> reset, and call hns3_nic_net_xmit() with that skb later.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you be more specific here? Which call path requests a smaller
>>>>>>> tx queue num? If you mean netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(), clearly
>>>>>>> we already have a synchronize_net() there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When the netdevice is in active state, the synchronize_net() seems to
>>>>>> do the correct work, as below:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CPU 0:                                       CPU1:
>>>>>> __dev_queue_xmit()                       netif_set_real_num_tx_queues()
>>>>>> rcu_read_lock_bh();
>>>>>> netdev_core_pick_tx(dev, skb, sb_dev);
>>>>>>         .
>>>>>>         .                               dev->real_num_tx_queues = txq;
>>>>>>         .                                       .
>>>>>>         .                                       .
>>>>>>         .                               synchronize_net();
>>>>>>         .                                       .
>>>>>> q->enqueue()                                    .
>>>>>>         .                                       .
>>>>>> rcu_read_unlock_bh()                            .
>>>>>>                                         qdisc_reset_all_tx_gt
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Right.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> but dev->real_num_tx_queues is not RCU-protected, maybe that is a problem
>>>>>> too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The problem we hit is as below:
>>>>>> In hns3_set_channels(), hns3_reset_notify(h, HNAE3_DOWN_CLIENT) is called
>>>>>> to deactive the netdevice when user requested a smaller queue num, and
>>>>>> txq->qdisc is already changed to noop_qdisc when calling
>>>>>> netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(), so the synchronize_net() in the function
>>>>>> netif_set_real_num_tx_queues() does not help here.
>>>>>
>>>>> How could qdisc still be running after deactivating the device?
>>>>
>>>> qdisc could be running during the device deactivating process.
>>>>
>>>> The main process of changing channel number is as below:
>>>>
>>>> 1. dev_deactivate()
>>>> 2. hns3 handware related setup
>>>> 3. netif_set_real_num_tx_queues()
>>>> 4. netif_tx_wake_all_queues()
>>>> 5. dev_activate()
>>>>
>>>> During step 1, qdisc could be running while qdisc is resetting, so
>>>> there could be skb left in the old qdisc(which will be restored back to
>>>> txq->qdisc during dev_activate()), as below:
>>>>
>>>> CPU 0:                                       CPU1:
>>>> __dev_queue_xmit():                      dev_deactivate_many():
>>>> rcu_read_lock_bh();                      qdisc_deactivate(qdisc);
>>>> q = rcu_dereference_bh(txq->qdisc);             .
>>>> netdev_core_pick_tx(dev, skb, sb_dev);          .
>>>>         .
>>>>         .                               rcu_assign_pointer(dev_queue->qdisc, qdisc_default);
>>>>         .                                       .
>>>>         .                                       .
>>>>         .                                       .
>>>>         .                                       .
>>>> q->enqueue()                                    .
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, like I said, if the deactivated bit were tested before ->enqueue(),
>>> there would be no packet queued after qdisc_deactivate().
>>
>> Only if the deactivated bit testing is also protected by qdisc->seqlock?
>> otherwise there is still window between setting and testing the deactivated bit.
> 
> Can you be more specific here? Why testing or setting a bit is not atomic?

testing a bit or setting a bit separately is atomic.
But testing a bit and setting a bit is not atomic, right?

  cpu0:                   cpu1:
                        testing A bit
setting A bit                .
       .                     .
       .               qdisc enqueuing
qdisc reset

> 
> AFAIU, qdisc->seqlock is an optimization to replace
> __QDISC_STATE_RUNNING, which has nothing to do with deactivate bit.
> 
> Thanks.
> .
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-03  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-01  0:55 Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-01  6:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-09-01  7:27   ` Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-01 18:34     ` David Miller
2020-09-02  1:43       ` Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-01 18:24 ` Cong Wang
2020-09-02  1:42   ` Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-02  4:41     ` Cong Wang
2020-09-02  6:34       ` Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-02  7:32         ` Eric Dumazet
2020-09-02  8:14           ` Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-02  9:20             ` Eric Dumazet
2020-09-03  1:14               ` Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-03  7:24                 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-09-04  8:10                   ` Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-03  0:35         ` Cong Wang
2020-09-03  1:21           ` Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-03  1:48             ` Cong Wang
2020-09-03  2:22               ` Yunsheng Lin [this message]
2020-09-03  2:53                 ` Cong Wang
2020-09-04  1:30                   ` John Fastabend
2020-09-04  8:08                     ` Yunsheng Lin
2020-09-06  8:52 ` [net] 6fd0d0dede: hwsim.ap_ht40_5ghz_switch.fail kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c0543793-11fa-6ef1-f8ea-6a724ab2de8f@huawei.com \
    --to=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sch_generic: aviod concurrent reset and enqueue op for lockless qdisc' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).