Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] net/smc: Resolve the race between SMC-R link access and clear
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:44:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eecadb47-92f3-c4cc-64d2-3954474e3c5f@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1882268-d8bb-eee9-8238-e30962928034@linux.ibm.com>
On 2022/1/12 00:02, Karsten Graul wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 16:49, Wen Gu wrote:
>>
>> OK, I will correct this as well.
>>
>> And similarly I want to move smc_ibdev_cnt_dec() and put_device() to
>> __smcr_link_clear() as well to ensure that put link related resources
>> only when link is actually cleared. What do you think?
>
> I think that's a good idea, yes.
Thank you.
Not in a hurry, just want to ask should I send a v2 with these changes
or continue to wait for subsequent review of v1?
Thanks,
Wen Gu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-11 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-10 9:26 [PATCH net 0/3] net/smc: Fixes for race in smc link group termination Wen Gu
2022-01-10 9:26 ` [PATCH net 1/3] net/smc: Resolve the race between link group access and termination Wen Gu
2022-01-10 12:25 ` Karsten Graul
2022-01-10 13:56 ` Wen Gu
2022-01-11 8:23 ` Karsten Graul
2022-01-11 15:36 ` Wen Gu
2022-01-11 15:46 ` Karsten Graul
2022-01-11 15:51 ` Wen Gu
2022-01-10 9:26 ` [PATCH net 2/3] net/smc: Introduce a new conn->lgr validity check helper Wen Gu
2022-01-10 9:26 ` [PATCH net 3/3] net/smc: Resolve the race between SMC-R link access and clear Wen Gu
2022-01-11 8:40 ` Karsten Graul
2022-01-11 15:49 ` Wen Gu
2022-01-11 16:02 ` Karsten Graul
2022-01-11 16:44 ` Wen Gu [this message]
2022-01-11 17:42 ` Karsten Graul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eecadb47-92f3-c4cc-64d2-3954474e3c5f@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH net 3/3] net/smc: Resolve the race between SMC-R link access and clear' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).